Highest paid federal employee in the entire US Gov (2019)? Dr. Fauci.

- Anthony Fauci: $417,608
- POTUS: $400,000
- Chief Justice: $270,700
- Pelosi: $223,500
- Memb of Cong: $174,000

In a ten-year period between 2010 and 2019, Fauci made $3.6 million in salary. Since 2014, Fauci’s pay increased from $335,000 to the current $417,608. (Disclose.‌tv)

Join and unite:
@truth_awakening_channel

🛑 Rep. Jordan to Newsmax TV: How Do You Impeach a President who has Left

Join and unite:
@truthawakeningchannel
https://news.1rj.ru/str/truthawakeningchannel/1
via Newsmax


https://cutt.ly/kj8jGRH

𝗗𝗮𝗻 𝗕𝗼𝗻𝗴𝗶𝗻𝗼 - 𝗟𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗻 𝗰𝗹𝗼𝘀𝗲𝗹𝘆 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘆𝗼𝘂'𝗹𝗹 𝗵𝗲𝗮𝗿 𝗶𝘁.

Join and unite:
@truth_awakening_channel

𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗟𝗼𝗰𝗸𝗱𝗼𝘄𝗻𝘀 𝗪𝗲𝗿𝗲 𝗝𝘂𝘀𝘁 𝗣𝗿𝗲𝗽𝗮𝗿𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗬𝗼𝘂 𝗳𝗼𝗿 "𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗚𝗿𝗲𝗮𝘁 𝗥𝗲𝘀𝗲𝘁"
𝗕𝗼𝗻𝗴𝗶𝗻𝗼 𝗥𝗲𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁
𝗝𝗮𝗻𝘂𝗮𝗿𝘆 𝟮𝟱, 𝟮𝟬𝟮𝟭

Join and unite:
@truth_awakening_channel

via Twitter

U.S. federal judge blocks deportation freeze following a legal challenge by Texas, dealing an early blow to President Biden’s immigration plans. (Disclose.‌tv)

Join and unite:
@truth_awakening_channel

Unbelievable, what have we got here.... 🤣🤣🤣

Join and unite:
@truth_awakening_channel

𝗩𝗘𝗦𝗧𝗘𝗗 𝗜𝗡𝗧𝗘𝗥𝗘𝗦𝗧𝗦... 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝘁𝗵𝗼𝘂𝗴𝗵𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗮𝗹𝗹 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝘀𝘂𝗳𝗳𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗶𝘀 𝗮𝗯𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗵𝗲𝗮𝗹𝘁𝗵 𝗼𝗳 𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗻𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻...

𝗛𝗼𝗹𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗼𝘂𝗴𝗵𝘁 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗿𝘁 𝗾𝘂𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗴𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗿𝗻𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁𝘀/𝗽𝗮𝗿𝗹𝗶𝗮𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁𝘀 𝗻𝗮𝗿𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲...?

𝗠𝗮𝘁𝘁 𝗛𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗼𝗰𝗸, 𝗩𝗮𝗹𝗹𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗲, 𝗪𝗵𝗶𝘁𝘁𝘆 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗚𝗮𝘁𝗲𝘀...

Big players behind big pharma uk
Needs to be read:
https://cutt.ly/KaM6Q1J

Copy the above text and share for awareness #SharingIsCaring ❤️💕

The WHO: A Bloated, Corrupt, Unaccountable, Thug-Hugging Bureaucracy.
https://cutt.ly/8fpyNgn

Join and unite:

@truth_awakening_channel

𝗣𝗲𝘁𝗲𝗿 𝗛𝗶𝘁𝗰𝗵𝗲𝗻𝘀 𝗵𝗮𝘀 𝗯𝗲𝗲𝗻 𝗰𝗲𝗻𝘀𝗼𝗿𝗲𝗱 𝗯𝘆 𝗧𝗮𝗹𝗸 𝗥𝗮𝗱𝗶𝗼 - 𝗣𝗼𝗹𝗶𝘁𝗶𝗰𝗼.

https://youtu.be/iST-7dtaIlg

Join and unite:
@truth_awakening_channel

Benny Johnson
#TheTruthByBenny

𝗠𝗼𝗱𝗲𝗿𝗻𝗮 - 𝗼𝗽𝗲𝗻𝗹𝘆 𝗱𝗲𝗺𝗼𝗻𝘀𝘁𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗺𝗥𝗡𝗔 𝗗𝗡𝗔/𝗴𝗲𝗻𝗲 𝗮𝗹𝘁𝗲𝗿𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗱𝗲𝗮𝗱𝗹𝘆 𝘃𝗮𝗰𝗰𝗶𝗻𝗲....

" Let’s make sure we are clear… This is not a vaccine. They are using the term “vaccine” to sneak this thing under public health exemptions. This is not a vaccine."
"This is mRNA packaged in a fat envelope that is delivered to a cell. It is a medical device designed to stimulate the human cell into becoming a pathogen creator. It is not a vaccine. Vaccines actually are a legally defined term under public health law; they are a legally defined term under CDC and FDA standards.

Dr. David Martin. January 5, 2021

𝟰𝟱 𝗥𝗲𝗽𝘂𝗯𝗹𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗻 𝗦𝗲𝗻𝗮𝘁𝗼𝗿𝘀 𝗩𝗼𝘁𝗲 𝗔𝗴𝗮𝗶𝗻𝘀𝘁 𝗧𝗿𝘂𝗺𝗽 𝗜𝗺𝗽𝗲𝗮𝗰𝗵𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗧𝗿𝗶𝗮𝗹, 𝗦𝗮𝘆 𝗜𝘁’𝘀 𝗨𝗻𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘀𝘁𝗶𝘁𝘂𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝗮𝗹
𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝟱𝟱–𝟰𝟱 𝗱𝗲𝗰𝗶𝘀𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝘀𝘂𝗴𝗴𝗲𝘀𝘁𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗧𝗿𝘂𝗺𝗽 𝘄𝗶𝗹𝗹 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗯𝗲 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝘃𝗶𝗰𝘁𝗲𝗱 𝗶𝗻 𝗮𝗻 𝗶𝗺𝗽𝗲𝗮𝗰𝗵𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝘁𝗿𝗶𝗮𝗹

Forty-five Republican senators voted against holding an impeachment trial of former President Donald Trump over his remarks at the U.S. Capitol, saying it would be unconstitutional to impeach a former president.

All but five GOP senators sided with an effort proposed by Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), sending a signal that there are not enough votes to convict Trump. Convicting a president during a Senate impeachment trial requires a two-thirds majority.

Republican Sens. Mitt Romney (Utah), Ben Sasse (Neb.), Susan Collins (Maine), Lisa Murkowski (Alaska), and Pat Toomey (Pa.) voted with Democrats to reject Paul’s order, suggesting the five senators will vote to convict Trump. Romney was the only Republican senator to vote to convict Trump during his first impeachment trial in early 2020.

The Senate ultimately voted 55–45 to table Paul’s point of order, meaning that the impeachment trial will go forward. The House voted to impeach Trump earlier this month on the sole impeachment charge of “incitement of insurrection,” with Democrats claiming he incited violence at the U.S. Capitol earlier this month. Trump called on the protesters not to engage in violent acts and later told them to “go home in peace.”

Trump is the first president to be impeached twice, and the first president to undergo an impeachment trial after leaving office.

Ahead of the vote, Paul warned that he wanted to force his colleagues to go on the record.

“If we are going to put every politician in jail, are we going to impeach every politician who has used the words ‘fight’ figuratively in a speech? Shame,” he said. “I want this body on record. Every last person here,” Paul added.

Elaborating, Paul added: “As of noon last Wednesday, Donald Trump holds none of the positions listed in the Constitution. He is a private citizen. The presiding officer is not the chief justice, nor does he claim to be. His presence in the chief justice’s absence demonstrates that this is not a trial of the president, but a private citizen.”

Sen. James Lankford (R-Okla.) issued the following statement after he voted to support Paul’s point of order on the constitutionality of the trial of a former president: “This is not a trial; this is political theater. You cannot remove someone from office who is already out of office. In this trial there is no current President, no Chief Justice, and no possibility someone could be removed from office because they are not in any office. In a moment when our nation needs to unite, this trial will only create even deeper divisions.”

While a number of Republican senators have faulted Trump’s speech to demonstrators as a group breached the U.S. Capitol during the Joint Session of Congress, many have said it’s problematic to impeach a president who doesn’t hold office.

Any Republican who votes to convict Trump is sure to face blowback among the GOP base—as Trump remains an enormously popular figure in the party. Rep. Liz Cheney (R-Wyo.) and about nine other Republican House members who voted to impeach Trump have faced significant criticism and primary threats.

Pushing back against Republicans, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) has stated that the trial is not unconstitutional. At least two Republicans—Romney and Murkowski—agreed with him.

“We need truth and accountability for Donald Trump’s actions. His impeachment trial will move forward in the United States Senate,” Schumer wrote on Twitter.

Several law experts—namely Harvard Law professor Alan Dershowitz—have argued the trial goes against the Constitution.

“It will be unconstitutional, but that probably won’t bother the senators,” Dershowitz told Fox News earlier this month. “The Constitution is very clear. The subject, the object, the purpose of impeachment is to remove a sitting president. And there are two precedents. One is very obvious. When President Nixon resigned in anticipation of being impeached and removed, there was no effort to impeach him after he left office.”

https://bit.ly/36hHiNo

@Epochtimeschannel
@truth_awakening_channel

𝗦𝗲𝗻𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗗𝗲𝗺𝗼𝗰𝗿𝗮𝘁𝘀 𝗜𝗻𝘁𝗿𝗼𝗱𝘂𝗰𝗲 𝗕𝗶𝗹𝗹 𝘁𝗼 𝗥𝗮𝗶𝘀𝗲 𝗡𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝗮𝗹 𝗠𝗶𝗻𝗶𝗺𝘂𝗺 𝗪𝗮𝗴𝗲 𝘁𝗼 $𝟭𝟱 𝗔𝗻 𝗛𝗼𝘂𝗿

https://bit.ly/2YiKqnN @Epochtimeschannel

Unite and join the @awakeningchannel

Save Our Rights UK, [27.01.21 07:49]
📍LAST CHANCE📍

#SPYCOPS Bill is in the house today!!

This morning is your last chance to write in to your MP if you haven’t already and encourage them to vote for amendments to the Covert Human Intelligence Sources Bill.

This Bill gives wide sweeping powers to people working undercover. With this Bill the Government have not limited the crimes that can be committed while working undercover meaning that they could commit torture or murder and not face charges for their actions. Not only that the criteria of when these powers can be used is vague and the bar is set as low as ‘to prevent disorder’ or ‘to protect the economic interests of the UK’. Furthermore these powers have been granted to a wide range of bodies who would seemingly have no need of them such as the Food Standards Agency and the Gambling Authority. When taking all of these points into consideration it is clear to see that this Bill enables corruption and abuse of the system which could result in the loss of life and further impinge upon our rights, liberty and democracy.

The Government had the chance in October to amend this Bill however they chose not to with amendments often being voted down by 60 votes. Thankfully the Lords saw sense and have brought forward even more amendments including to protect children and to allow victims to claim compensation.

These amendments will be HEARD TODAY!

Thank you for doing your bit to stand up for liberty, human rights and democracy!

Saveourrights.uk/spycops

𝗕𝗥𝗘𝗔𝗞𝗜𝗡𝗚: 𝗣𝗿𝗼-𝗹𝗶𝗳𝗲 𝗣𝗼𝗹𝗶𝘀𝗵 𝗖𝗮𝘁𝗵𝗼𝗹𝗶𝗰 𝗱𝗶𝗲𝘀 𝗳𝗿𝗼𝗺 𝗱𝗲𝗵𝘆𝗱𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻, 𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗿𝘃𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗶𝗻 𝗘𝗻𝗴𝗹𝗶𝘀𝗵 𝗵𝗼𝘀𝗽𝗶𝘁𝗮𝗹 - PLEASE SIGN PETITION TO STOP THIS PRACTICE IN THE UK

The legal and diplomatic struggle to keep the middle-aged, devout Catholic father alive has been described by more than one Polish commentator as a 'battle with the Civilization of Death.'
Tue Jan 26, 2021 - 11:01 am EST

SOUTH-WEST ENGLAND, United Kingdom, January 26, 2021 (LifeSiteNews) — The brain-damaged Polish Catholic at the heart of a right-to-life battle in England has died.

The deceased, known as RS, was disconnected from hydration and nutrition on January 14, a month after the expiry of a final stay of a December 15, 2020 court decision permitting the University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust to discontinue RS’s “medical treatment.”

The Polish national died earlier today despite weeks of litigation by his birth family and the Polish Government, as well as multiple petitions from people in Poland and across the world to the British Government to release RS into his government’s care. His family was notified of his death less than two hours ago.

An ill-named “Transparency Order” makes it illegal for anyone to publish details or photographs that threaten the anonymity of RS, his wife, children, doctors, hospital and members of his birth family. Nevertheless, the Polish media published photos and videos of the man in hospital as well as his first name. The many Poles who took the sick man into their hearts also referred to him as “nasz rodak” —our compatriot.

Roger Kiska of the United Kingdom’s Christian Legal Centre, which spent over £70,000 in the fight to preserve RS’s life, told LifeSiteNews that the organization is “gutted” by RS’s untimely passing.

“We are gutted by the death of R.S.," Kiska said via email.

“Our prayers are with his family. We hope that because of the family’s efforts that no other person will have to see their loved ones die in such an inhumane and degrading way,” he continued.

“We are grateful to Poland for all of the extraordinary measures it has taken to preserve his life. One must genuinely question the soul of a culture which views such measures as those that ended R.S.’s life as being an act of compassion. It is a sad day indeed.”

The legal and diplomatic struggle to keep the middle-aged, devout Catholic father alive has been described by more than one Polish commentator as a “battle with the Civilization of Death.” It involved the clash of RS’ warm-hearted Polish Catholic culture, which abhors euthanasia as a relic of the Nazi occupation, with the cold granite of contemporary British law.

RS fell into a coma on November 6, 2020 after suffering a heart attack and sustaining serious brain damage. Although the doctors who examined RS believed that he had only a small chance of progressing to a minimally conscious state, they also testified that he might live five or more years longer on life-support. By December 23, RS was capable of breathing for himself, so his life-support consisted of clinically assisted nutrition and hydration (CANH). Subsequently doctors disagreed over whether RS had been moving from a coma into a vegetative or into a minimally conscious state in late December.

‘RS will never achieve a meaningful quality of life’
The University Hospitals Plymouth National Trust, supported by RS’s legal wife, wished to discontinue his life-support because they believed that he would never, in the words of one specialist, “achieve a meaningful quality of life.” RS’s wife testified that her husband “never wanted to be a burden if he was seriously ill” and “would not want his children to see him in his current condition” but “remember him as an able-bodied person.”

RS’s wife also testified that he had said “that every life is precious and that you must hold on to life, and also that if anything happened to him, he would want all steps to be taken to save him.” However, she added that he said that “if he was beyond saving he did not want to be kept alive.” RS’s wife also told the court that “he would not regard removing treatment as removing life.”

However, RS’ birth family, including his mother, two sisters, and niece, remained adamantly opposed to the removal of RS’s hydration and nutrition. They pointed to his firm Catholic beliefs in the rights of the sick to life and to compassionate care. They testified that RS was opposed to abortion and euthanasia. RS had also disagreed with a court decision to end the life of Alfie Evans through the withdrawal of his life-support.

https://bit.ly/39kFDIE

@truthawakeningchannel