This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🇬🇧Tony Benn, tells it like it is..
He was a great man who stood tall.for patriotism.
Subscribe 👇 and unite: 🤝
@truthawakeningchannel
https://news.1rj.ru/str/truthawakeningchannel/1
He was a great man who stood tall.for patriotism.
Subscribe 👇 and unite: 🤝
@truthawakeningchannel
https://news.1rj.ru/str/truthawakeningchannel/1
🇺🇸Man Charged in Capitol Riot Worked for FBI and Had Security Clearance, Attorney Says.
Man charged in connection with the U.S. Capitol riot claims he’s worked for the FBI and holds a top security clearance since 1979 (The Hill).
https://cutt.ly/IkRlNr2
Download our app to read more at https://ept.ms/DownloadApp.
Subscribe 👇 and unite: 🤝
@truthawakeningchannel
https://news.1rj.ru/str/truthawakeningchannel/1
Man charged in connection with the U.S. Capitol riot claims he’s worked for the FBI and holds a top security clearance since 1979 (The Hill).
https://cutt.ly/IkRlNr2
Download our app to read more at https://ept.ms/DownloadApp.
Subscribe 👇 and unite: 🤝
@truthawakeningchannel
https://news.1rj.ru/str/truthawakeningchannel/1
The Epoch Times
Man Charged in Capitol Riot Worked for FBI and Had Security Clearance, Attorney Says
The lawyer for a man who was charged in the Jan. 6 Capitol riots said the defendant has ...
👍1
🇬🇧𝟭𝟳/𝟮𝟬 𝗼𝗳 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗺𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝗶𝗻𝗳𝗹𝘂𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗮𝗹 𝗦𝗔𝗚𝗘 𝗺𝗲𝗺𝗯𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝗵𝗮𝘃𝗲 𝗹𝗼𝗻𝗴-𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗯𝗹𝗶𝘀𝗵𝗲𝗱 𝘄𝗼𝗿𝗸𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗿𝗲𝗹𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀𝗵𝗶𝗽𝘀 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵 #𝗕𝗶𝗴𝗣𝗵𝗮𝗿𝗺𝗮.
𝗧𝗵𝗲𝗶𝗿 𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗹 𝗺𝗼𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝗶𝘀 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝘁𝗼 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝘁𝗲𝗰𝘁 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘀𝗮𝘃𝗲 - 𝗶𝘁 𝗶𝘀 𝘁𝗼 𝗺𝗮𝘅𝗶𝗺𝗶𝘀𝗲 𝘃𝗮𝗰𝗰𝗶𝗻𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝘂𝗽𝘁𝗮𝗸𝗲.
𝗧𝗵𝗲𝗶𝗿 𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗹 𝗺𝗼𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝗶𝘀 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝘁𝗼 𝗽𝗿𝗼𝘁𝗲𝗰𝘁 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘀𝗮𝘃𝗲 - 𝗶𝘁 𝗶𝘀 𝘁𝗼 𝗺𝗮𝘅𝗶𝗺𝗶𝘀𝗲 𝘃𝗮𝗰𝗰𝗶𝗻𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝘂𝗽𝘁𝗮𝗸𝗲.
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🇬🇧𝗣𝗼𝗹𝗶𝘁𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗹𝗹𝘆 𝗜𝗻𝗰𝗼𝗿𝗿𝗲𝗰𝘁 𝗣𝗼𝗱𝗰𝗮𝘀𝘁 | 𝗠𝗢𝗕 - press image to listen.
𝗠𝗶𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗲𝗹 𝗢'𝗕𝗲𝗿𝗻𝗶𝗰𝗶𝗮
𝗜𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗿𝘃𝗶𝗲𝘄𝘀 𝗗𝗮𝘃𝗶𝗱 𝗣𝗮𝗿𝗸𝗲𝗿 & 𝗗𝗮𝘄𝗻 𝗟𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗿 𝗔𝗯𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝗪𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗥𝗲𝗮𝗹𝗹𝘆 𝗠𝗮𝗸𝗲𝘀 𝗬𝗼𝘂 𝗜𝗹𝗹.
Subscribe 👇 and unite: 🤝
@truthawakeningchannel
https://news.1rj.ru/str/truthawakeningchannel/1
𝗠𝗶𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗲𝗹 𝗢'𝗕𝗲𝗿𝗻𝗶𝗰𝗶𝗮
𝗜𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗿𝘃𝗶𝗲𝘄𝘀 𝗗𝗮𝘃𝗶𝗱 𝗣𝗮𝗿𝗸𝗲𝗿 & 𝗗𝗮𝘄𝗻 𝗟𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗲𝗿 𝗔𝗯𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝗪𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝗥𝗲𝗮𝗹𝗹𝘆 𝗠𝗮𝗸𝗲𝘀 𝗬𝗼𝘂 𝗜𝗹𝗹.
Subscribe 👇 and unite: 🤝
@truthawakeningchannel
https://news.1rj.ru/str/truthawakeningchannel/1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🇺🇸𝗗𝗢𝗡𝗔𝗟𝗗 𝗧𝗥𝗨𝗠𝗣 𝗝𝗡𝗥.
𝗜 𝗰𝗼𝘂𝗹𝗱𝗻’𝘁 𝗰𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗹𝗲𝘀𝘀 𝗵𝗼𝘄 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗳𝘆 𝗯𝘂𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗶𝘀 𝗿𝗶𝗱𝗶𝗰𝘂𝗹𝗼𝘂𝘀.
Subscribe 👇 and unite:
@Truth_Awakening_Channel
Where people come together to debate the real truth.
https://news.1rj.ru/str/Truth_Awakening_Channel
𝗜 𝗰𝗼𝘂𝗹𝗱𝗻’𝘁 𝗰𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗹𝗲𝘀𝘀 𝗵𝗼𝘄 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗳𝘆 𝗯𝘂𝘁 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀 𝗶𝘀 𝗿𝗶𝗱𝗶𝗰𝘂𝗹𝗼𝘂𝘀.
Subscribe 👇 and unite:
@Truth_Awakening_Channel
Where people come together to debate the real truth.
https://news.1rj.ru/str/Truth_Awakening_Channel
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🇬🇧𝗔𝗹𝗲𝘅 𝗕𝗲𝗹𝗳𝗶𝗲𝗹𝗱 - 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗩𝗼𝗶𝗰𝗲 𝗢𝗳 𝗥𝗲𝗮𝘀𝗼𝗻 @ 𝘄𝘄𝘄.𝗽𝗮𝘆𝗽𝗮𝗹.𝗺𝗲/𝗙𝗥𝗘𝗘𝗦𝗣𝗘𝗘𝗖𝗛𝗨𝗞
𝗧𝗲𝘀𝗰𝗼 𝗦𝗛𝗔𝗠𝗘 𝗔𝗚𝗔𝗜𝗡 😱 𝗠𝗮𝗻 𝗗𝗲𝗮𝗱 𝗢𝘃𝗲𝗿 𝗦𝘁𝗮𝗳𝗳 𝗥𝗲𝗳𝘂𝘀𝗮𝗹 𝗧𝗼 𝗨𝘀𝗲 𝗗𝗲𝗳𝗶𝗯𝗿𝗶𝗹𝗹𝗮𝘁𝗼𝗿 😡
https://youtu.be/1oHhKjl9d94
Subscribe 👇 and unite:
@Truth_Awakening_Channel
Where people come together to debate the real truth.
https://news.1rj.ru/str/Truth_Awakening_Channel
𝗧𝗲𝘀𝗰𝗼 𝗦𝗛𝗔𝗠𝗘 𝗔𝗚𝗔𝗜𝗡 😱 𝗠𝗮𝗻 𝗗𝗲𝗮𝗱 𝗢𝘃𝗲𝗿 𝗦𝘁𝗮𝗳𝗳 𝗥𝗲𝗳𝘂𝘀𝗮𝗹 𝗧𝗼 𝗨𝘀𝗲 𝗗𝗲𝗳𝗶𝗯𝗿𝗶𝗹𝗹𝗮𝘁𝗼𝗿 😡
https://youtu.be/1oHhKjl9d94
Subscribe 👇 and unite:
@Truth_Awakening_Channel
Where people come together to debate the real truth.
https://news.1rj.ru/str/Truth_Awakening_Channel
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
The Americans are doing it with style!🤣🤣🤣 Educating Brainwashed.
🇺🇸In an 'impeachment', it is the accused's 'office' which permits the impeachment. Ceasing to hold that office terminates the possibility and purpose of an impeachment.
Private persons MAY NOT be impeached in America (this was one of the deviations from British Law, where only the King could not be impeached, which a then-newly-independent America made).
The primary; in fact, the only required remedy of 'impeachment'' is 'removal' (from office) - Art 2 Sec 4 , US Constitution. It is undeniable that, in this instance, 'removal' is moot. Removal is a factual and legal impossibility impossibility in this instance; yet, the Article of Impeachment, put forth by the Democrats calls for 'removal'!
In ordinary criminal jurisprudence, one convicted of public crimes while in office, may still be punished even though they no longer hold that office. Not so with impeachments and this distinction is made in the Constitution.
In a Senate Impeachment trial, conviction MEANS and REQUIRES 'removal from office.'
A conviction without a removal is no conviction at all.
Only upon a valid conviction and its requisite, enforceable, removal can the additional judgement of 'disqualification' plausibly be entertained.
Presidents are impeachable because presidents are removable. Former presidents are not, because they can not be removed!
NOTE: This is the first time that the United States Senate has been asked to apply the Constitution's textual identification of 'the president', in the impeachment traditions, to anyone other than the sitting president of the United States.
Speaks volumes, doesn't it?
Private persons MAY NOT be impeached in America (this was one of the deviations from British Law, where only the King could not be impeached, which a then-newly-independent America made).
The primary; in fact, the only required remedy of 'impeachment'' is 'removal' (from office) - Art 2 Sec 4 , US Constitution. It is undeniable that, in this instance, 'removal' is moot. Removal is a factual and legal impossibility impossibility in this instance; yet, the Article of Impeachment, put forth by the Democrats calls for 'removal'!
In ordinary criminal jurisprudence, one convicted of public crimes while in office, may still be punished even though they no longer hold that office. Not so with impeachments and this distinction is made in the Constitution.
In a Senate Impeachment trial, conviction MEANS and REQUIRES 'removal from office.'
A conviction without a removal is no conviction at all.
Only upon a valid conviction and its requisite, enforceable, removal can the additional judgement of 'disqualification' plausibly be entertained.
Presidents are impeachable because presidents are removable. Former presidents are not, because they can not be removed!
NOTE: This is the first time that the United States Senate has been asked to apply the Constitution's textual identification of 'the president', in the impeachment traditions, to anyone other than the sitting president of the United States.
Speaks volumes, doesn't it?
👍1
🇬🇧𝗨𝗞 𝗖𝗼𝗹𝘂𝗺𝗻 𝗡𝗲𝘄𝘀 𝗦𝗽𝗲𝗰𝗶𝗮𝗹: 𝗖𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗛𝗼𝗺𝗲 𝗪𝗵𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗹𝗲𝗯𝗹𝗼𝘄𝗲𝗿
UK Column
Published on 9 Feb 2021
UKColumn was recently contacted by an experienced Care Home manager. The individual was deeply concerned about the effects of Covid 19 and vaccinations, on both staff and the elderly, within care facilities across the country. Finally their personal concern had reached the point where they felt the need to speak out to the wider public.
However, due to likely management pressure and kick-back, and likely punitive action from within the broader Care system itself, they needed to do so as an anonymous whistleblower.
We take it as a significant compliment that they chose come to the UKColumn to tell their story. As will become apparent in the interview with them, to speak out from within the UK Care System in 2021, carries risks to both your job, and professionally qualified status. In short, whistleblowers are at risk of losing their job, and may lose the ability to find care work elsewhere if this also impacts on their vital professional registration.
Against this background we applaud this person for their courage in blowing the whistle and speaking the truth. Please join us in this UKColumn news special, where we hear first hand about the mindset of the social care system, which has reacted vigorously to implement the UK government's Covid 19 protection policies - to the point of being zealous.
But despite strict adherence to the government's Covid protection arrangements, and diligent care work in general, it now emerges that elderly people who remained free of Covid for many weeks and months, became Covid positive following vaccinations.
A pattern that was also to affect hardworking staff, who until then, had been clear of the illness. Significantly this pattern was being seen by managers across the country’s care system, and sickness amongst staff of course placed both the care system itself, and those staff still working, under greatly increased pressure. Our whistleblower stresses that far from being one or two odd cases, there was a “dramatic increase’ in Covid outbreaks after vaccinations. Asked if this related to one particular, or all of the three vaccines, they stated that they did not have precise information on this, but believed the Pfizer vaccine was the most likely culprit. Moreover there was “huge confusion in Covid testing and the reliability of results."
The testing policy and results such as they are, were described as an “ever changing landscape,” in which little confidence could be placed. Questioned as to the route by which these observations and concerns could be passed into official professional channels, the whistleblower commented that whether the reporting channel was the CQC or the Professional Care body, there was a reluctance to hear bad news about the Covid 19 and vaccination policy as a whole. To the point the system which should have received and acted upon concerns, was described as having “tin ears.” It did not want to hear and would not hear.
The whistleblower also added that “increasingly social care provision was no longer a question of the application of appropriate professional care decided upon by the carer themselves, but rather professional social carers were now treated as an 'Agent of the State’ to follow guidelines and procedures.” As we see Covid 19 deaths amongst the elderly increasing, with further mortality increases (for whatever reason) post vaccination, the picture provided by this individual of some 30 years professional care experience at high management level, is deeply worrying.
Vulnerable elderly people are becoming sick and are dying, their hard pressed carers are also becoming sick, and yet to speak out brings indifference at best, and real threats to the whistleblower’s job at worst. What is really going on in the care system around vulnerable elderly people?
How has the UK care system come to this troubled state?
UK Column
Published on 9 Feb 2021
UKColumn was recently contacted by an experienced Care Home manager. The individual was deeply concerned about the effects of Covid 19 and vaccinations, on both staff and the elderly, within care facilities across the country. Finally their personal concern had reached the point where they felt the need to speak out to the wider public.
However, due to likely management pressure and kick-back, and likely punitive action from within the broader Care system itself, they needed to do so as an anonymous whistleblower.
We take it as a significant compliment that they chose come to the UKColumn to tell their story. As will become apparent in the interview with them, to speak out from within the UK Care System in 2021, carries risks to both your job, and professionally qualified status. In short, whistleblowers are at risk of losing their job, and may lose the ability to find care work elsewhere if this also impacts on their vital professional registration.
Against this background we applaud this person for their courage in blowing the whistle and speaking the truth. Please join us in this UKColumn news special, where we hear first hand about the mindset of the social care system, which has reacted vigorously to implement the UK government's Covid 19 protection policies - to the point of being zealous.
But despite strict adherence to the government's Covid protection arrangements, and diligent care work in general, it now emerges that elderly people who remained free of Covid for many weeks and months, became Covid positive following vaccinations.
A pattern that was also to affect hardworking staff, who until then, had been clear of the illness. Significantly this pattern was being seen by managers across the country’s care system, and sickness amongst staff of course placed both the care system itself, and those staff still working, under greatly increased pressure. Our whistleblower stresses that far from being one or two odd cases, there was a “dramatic increase’ in Covid outbreaks after vaccinations. Asked if this related to one particular, or all of the three vaccines, they stated that they did not have precise information on this, but believed the Pfizer vaccine was the most likely culprit. Moreover there was “huge confusion in Covid testing and the reliability of results."
The testing policy and results such as they are, were described as an “ever changing landscape,” in which little confidence could be placed. Questioned as to the route by which these observations and concerns could be passed into official professional channels, the whistleblower commented that whether the reporting channel was the CQC or the Professional Care body, there was a reluctance to hear bad news about the Covid 19 and vaccination policy as a whole. To the point the system which should have received and acted upon concerns, was described as having “tin ears.” It did not want to hear and would not hear.
The whistleblower also added that “increasingly social care provision was no longer a question of the application of appropriate professional care decided upon by the carer themselves, but rather professional social carers were now treated as an 'Agent of the State’ to follow guidelines and procedures.” As we see Covid 19 deaths amongst the elderly increasing, with further mortality increases (for whatever reason) post vaccination, the picture provided by this individual of some 30 years professional care experience at high management level, is deeply worrying.
Vulnerable elderly people are becoming sick and are dying, their hard pressed carers are also becoming sick, and yet to speak out brings indifference at best, and real threats to the whistleblower’s job at worst. What is really going on in the care system around vulnerable elderly people?
How has the UK care system come to this troubled state?
Join us to hear this critical whistleblower testimony for yourself, and please do help them by sharing this report as widely as possible.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nKSIPzJpjj0&feature=youtu.be
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nKSIPzJpjj0&feature=youtu.be
YouTube
UK Column News Special: Care Home Whistleblower
UKColumn was recently contacted by an experienced Care Home manager. The individual was deeply concerned about the effects of Covid 19 and vaccinations, on b...
🇺🇸 Fox Files Motion to Dismiss Smartmatic's $2.7 Billion Suit, Says Claims Against Company Were 'Newsworthy' Even if False
● Fox Corporation on Monday filed a motion to dismiss the $2.7 billion defamation lawsuit brought against it last week by Smartmatic, the multinational company that builds and implements electronic voting systems, which was one of the epicenters of charges and countercharges surrounding the bitterly-contested 2020 presidential election.
● The lawsuit charges Fox, along with three Fox anchors — Jeanine Pirro, Maria Bartiromo, and Lou Dobbs, whose show was canceled the day after the suit was filed — with “spreading falsehoods” that Smartmatic tried to rig the election against Donald Trump.
🔗 Read more: Red State
Subscribe 👇 and unite:
@Truth_Awakening_Channel
Where people come together to debate the real truth.
https://news.1rj.ru/str/Truth_Awakening_Channel
● Fox Corporation on Monday filed a motion to dismiss the $2.7 billion defamation lawsuit brought against it last week by Smartmatic, the multinational company that builds and implements electronic voting systems, which was one of the epicenters of charges and countercharges surrounding the bitterly-contested 2020 presidential election.
● The lawsuit charges Fox, along with three Fox anchors — Jeanine Pirro, Maria Bartiromo, and Lou Dobbs, whose show was canceled the day after the suit was filed — with “spreading falsehoods” that Smartmatic tried to rig the election against Donald Trump.
🔗 Read more: Red State
Subscribe 👇 and unite:
@Truth_Awakening_Channel
Where people come together to debate the real truth.
https://news.1rj.ru/str/Truth_Awakening_Channel
redstate.com
Fox Files Motion to Dismiss Smartmatic's $2.7 Billion Suit, Says Claims Against Company Were 'Newsworthy' Even if False
"Interviewing the president’s lawyers is fully protected First Amendment activity, whether those lawyers can substantiate their claims or not."
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
𝗦𝘂𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗿𝗶𝘁 𝗕𝗵𝗮𝗸𝗱𝗶 𝗠𝗗
𝗠𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝗰𝗶𝘁𝗲𝗱 𝗺𝗶𝗰𝗿𝗼𝗯𝗶𝗼𝗹𝗼𝗴𝗶𝘀𝘁 𝗶𝗻 𝗚𝗲𝗿𝗺𝗮𝗻 𝗮𝗰𝗮𝗱𝗲𝗺𝗶𝗰 𝗵𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗼𝗿𝘆.
#PlanetLockdown
This sit down interview with Sucharit Bhakdi about the current situation we find ourselves in. He is the most cited microbiologist in German academic history, an authority if there ever was one Shocked by the events of this year, he is speaking out about the scientific fallacies and human rights abuses at work now.
Subscribe 👇 and unite:
@Truth_Awakening_Channel
Where people come together to debate the real truth.
https://news.1rj.ru/str/Truth_Awakening_Channel
𝗠𝗼𝘀𝘁 𝗰𝗶𝘁𝗲𝗱 𝗺𝗶𝗰𝗿𝗼𝗯𝗶𝗼𝗹𝗼𝗴𝗶𝘀𝘁 𝗶𝗻 𝗚𝗲𝗿𝗺𝗮𝗻 𝗮𝗰𝗮𝗱𝗲𝗺𝗶𝗰 𝗵𝗶𝘀𝘁𝗼𝗿𝘆.
#PlanetLockdown
This sit down interview with Sucharit Bhakdi about the current situation we find ourselves in. He is the most cited microbiologist in German academic history, an authority if there ever was one Shocked by the events of this year, he is speaking out about the scientific fallacies and human rights abuses at work now.
Subscribe 👇 and unite:
@Truth_Awakening_Channel
Where people come together to debate the real truth.
https://news.1rj.ru/str/Truth_Awakening_Channel
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🇬🇧✔𝗖𝗿𝗲𝗱𝗶𝘁: 𝗠𝗮𝗵𝘆𝗮𝗿 𝗧𝗼𝘂𝘀𝗶
𝗡𝗼𝘄 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗴𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗿𝗻𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗵𝗮𝘀 𝗮𝗽𝗽𝗮𝗿𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗹𝘆 𝗴𝗶𝘃𝗲𝗻 𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝘀𝘂𝗽𝗽𝗼𝘀𝗲𝗱𝗹𝘆 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝗳𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗮𝗹 𝗺𝗲𝗱𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗹 𝗿𝗲𝗰𝗼𝗿𝗱𝘀 𝘁𝗼 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗽𝗼𝗹𝗶𝗰𝗲.
Hancock LEAKS Brits' Personal Medical Data To UK Police
CONTENT:
00:00 NHS Shares Medical Data With Police
05:07 New Zealand Takes China's Side
06:45 The Guardian Exposed
08:22 Labour MPs Steal Taxpayers' Money
https://youtu.be/cQ_KjaHGoy8
Subscribe 👇 and unite:
@Truth_Awakening_Channel
Where people come together to debate the real truth.
https://news.1rj.ru/str/Truth_Awakening_Channel
𝗡𝗼𝘄 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗴𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗿𝗻𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗵𝗮𝘀 𝗮𝗽𝗽𝗮𝗿𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗹𝘆 𝗴𝗶𝘃𝗲𝗻 𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝘀𝘂𝗽𝗽𝗼𝘀𝗲𝗱𝗹𝘆 𝗰𝗼𝗻𝗳𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗮𝗹 𝗺𝗲𝗱𝗶𝗰𝗮𝗹 𝗿𝗲𝗰𝗼𝗿𝗱𝘀 𝘁𝗼 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗽𝗼𝗹𝗶𝗰𝗲.
Hancock LEAKS Brits' Personal Medical Data To UK Police
CONTENT:
00:00 NHS Shares Medical Data With Police
05:07 New Zealand Takes China's Side
06:45 The Guardian Exposed
08:22 Labour MPs Steal Taxpayers' Money
https://youtu.be/cQ_KjaHGoy8
Subscribe 👇 and unite:
@Truth_Awakening_Channel
Where people come together to debate the real truth.
https://news.1rj.ru/str/Truth_Awakening_Channel
Forwarded from The Trumpist
🇬🇧United Kingdom
Subscribe 👇 and unite: 🤝
@truthawakeningchannel
https://news.1rj.ru/str/truthawakeningchannel/1
Subscribe 👇 and unite: 🤝
@truthawakeningchannel
https://news.1rj.ru/str/truthawakeningchannel/1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Orwell's final warning - Picture of the future. Don't let it happen. Resist with everything you have. Here's one powerful way: go-to www.standforhealthfreedom.com
Subscribe 👇 and unite:
@Truth_Awakening_Channel
Where people come together to debate the real truth.
https://news.1rj.ru/str/Truth_Awakening_Channel
Subscribe 👇 and unite:
@Truth_Awakening_Channel
Where people come together to debate the real truth.
https://news.1rj.ru/str/Truth_Awakening_Channel
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🇬🇧 SEEN THIS BULLSHIT?
Here is my comment which I put on FB:
Well, all of you who are "excited to get their vaccine" will find out sooner or later.. you all are experimental dummies for the Bill Gates and Klaus Schwab agenda.
None of you can think for yourselves and are being taken in by Elton John and Michael Caine..
Luckily I have not ever been star struck. I always question, question and question some more; unfortunately, many on those celebs page are going to put something into their bodies which they know not anything about.
I've have no respect for celebs.
Subscribe 👇 and unite:
@Truth_Awakening_Channel
Where people come together to debate the real truth.
https://news.1rj.ru/str/Truth_Awakening_Channel
Here is my comment which I put on FB:
Well, all of you who are "excited to get their vaccine" will find out sooner or later.. you all are experimental dummies for the Bill Gates and Klaus Schwab agenda.
None of you can think for yourselves and are being taken in by Elton John and Michael Caine..
Luckily I have not ever been star struck. I always question, question and question some more; unfortunately, many on those celebs page are going to put something into their bodies which they know not anything about.
I've have no respect for celebs.
Subscribe 👇 and unite:
@Truth_Awakening_Channel
Where people come together to debate the real truth.
https://news.1rj.ru/str/Truth_Awakening_Channel
Forwarded from Protest Everywhere
8 Feb 21 - Westminster Magistrates Court
Jeff Wyatt's final day in court challenging his arrest at Hyde Park 9 months ago under COVID regulations. Jeff was joined by Professor Dolores Cahill of The World Doctors Alliance and John Smith.
Based on this judgement, it's no longer legal to walk in the park in the UK.
1 year of lockdown = 1 year of life lost...
66 millions people in the UK = 66 million years lost!
The "virus" was downgraded to a 'non highly infectious disease' on 19th March 2020, which was before lockdown on the 23rd of March 2020. How is any of this legal or lawful?
We have unalienable rights - We must fight to keep them! See the list above.
Join us: https://news.1rj.ru/str/ProtestEverywhere 🌺
Jeff Wyatt's final day in court challenging his arrest at Hyde Park 9 months ago under COVID regulations. Jeff was joined by Professor Dolores Cahill of The World Doctors Alliance and John Smith.
Based on this judgement, it's no longer legal to walk in the park in the UK.
1 year of lockdown = 1 year of life lost...
66 millions people in the UK = 66 million years lost!
The "virus" was downgraded to a 'non highly infectious disease' on 19th March 2020, which was before lockdown on the 23rd of March 2020. How is any of this legal or lawful?
We have unalienable rights - We must fight to keep them! See the list above.
Join us: https://news.1rj.ru/str/ProtestEverywhere 🌺