"It is well known that crowding increases stress and aggression. The degree of crowding that exists today and the isolation of man from nature arc consequences of technological progress. All preindustrial societies were predominantly rural. The industrial Revolution vastly increased the size of cities and the proportion of the population that lives in them, and modern agricultural technology has made it possible for the Earth to support a far denser population than it ever did before. (Also, technology exacerbates the effects of crowding because it puts increased disruptive powers in people's hands. For example, a variety of noise-making devices: power mowers, radios, motorcycles, etc. If the use of these devices is unrestricted, people who want peace and quiet are frustrated by the noise. If their use is restricted, people who use the devices are frustrated by the regulations. [...])" - Ted Kaczynski, ISAIF

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Behavioral_sink
Some proof for this fact

"Of these concerns, climate change is perhaps the most troubling. A 2009 report by a UN affiliated think tank projects that, without drastic migration actions, climate change will cause "Much of civilization to collapse", for large proportions of the world. Here we have the ultimate irony: a technological civilization created and powered by fossil fuels, which ends up being so disruptive to the global climate that it destroyes itself. Along the way we will have eliminated thousands of other species, and put our own existence at risk. Perhaps a kind of cosmic justice is at work after all.
Theodore John Kaczynski (Technological Slavery)

⸸ Ted Kaczynski

184. Nature makes a perfect counter-ideal to technology for several reasons. Nature (that which is outside the power of the system) is the opposite of technology (which seeks to expand indefinitely the power of the system). Most people will agree that nature is beautiful; certainly it
has tremendous popular appeal. The radical environmentalists already hold an ideology that exalts nature and opposes technology.30 It is not necessary for the sake of nature to set up some chimerical
utopia or any new kind of social order. Nature takes care of itself: It was a spontaneous creation that existed long before any human society, and for countless centuries many different kinds of human societies coexisted with nature without doing it an excessive amount of damage. *Only with the Industrial Revolution did the effect of human society on nature become really devastating.*