Alright.

As I said above, I dont think the Bible is dependable, was selected and constructed for use. Example King James also wrote a book on demonology, while providing a Bible edit that many people flock to. It could be God's word -> but which God?

I do not think God is order, rather God is outside of time. He is not on the line of "Good" and "Evil." Actions or ideas are not entirely good and evil, in general, as lets say a forest burns down — but then the soil gets reset and within a generation we have a brand new forest full of new life and animals. Personal tragedy in life, lets say you loose your job, get injured, etc... this can be evil/bad and continue to spiral.. but many take the bad in and make something better of it. To me Good and Evil are limited thinking concepts, where as Cause and Effect, or Intent and Outcome, are other filters to use when examining a situation.

Christ Consciousness / God's Gift - to us the co-creators or the participants in reality is extremely powerful. Though as suggested I don't think it is strictly tied to a desire to be orderly. I think balance is more important, as Order easily can be Control under the guise of doing good. As with everything, levels of control, amount of control, intent.. are critical in the consideration. As the world has slid into darkness, it is very easy for a figure to step in and be "the light" — while being a false light and possibly a trap.

I do agree with you, when I hear about things coming from celestial beings, challenging's, spirits, etc.. I am somewhat skeptical on the total truth of the product/idea/theory. I don't specifically label this stuff as New Agism, as to me the understanding of creation, of reality, of the realm and the relationship between us and Creator God — all this should be understandable, debatable, observable without any book or movie.

To return to the initial point, God vs Satan. I think it's Lucifer vs Satan on this realm - or Lucifer vs Yahweh.

Yahweh the original owner of the realm, with Lucifer coming down to disrupt the old world. Old world being where we had peek materialism - no suffering, all this tech, total control of the realm. This is Old Testament God that demanded worship, but loved us. Not a good combination in a parent/manager/godlike administrator of earth. Lucifer is tasked with wrecking the place, as man has ceased to spiritually evolve, being so well looked after by Loving Yahweh. Lucifer has to set about a grand plan, and perhaps even used cataclysms to speed up this process. The great flood/mud flood.

Then, this process goes too far from my perspective but I am not a divine being to my immediate knowledge. So we have Jesus arrive, from Creator God, to bring the Christ Consciousness / Concept of Christ / Imagination / Creativity / etc... to re-balance the realm.

In this all, mortal followers of all three have had mixed ranks. It would seem to me that some followers of Lucifer/Satan do not want the party to end, being game makers so long they do not wish to return to having a mortal experience on this realm.

We keep hearing about a new earth, technology and utopia again, etc.. to me these easily could be the begging of the local gods for people to stay on earth when the time to decide comes.

"Go into the light" has been studied if it is a good thing, as well as the "life review" that is presented under various beliefs. "Oh you didnt do good enough, shall we go back again?" It's a loop, and great bribery by local management to keep people playing the game.

To get out of this place, and return to Creator God, I feel we must give up all attachments when we pass, and move away from whatever tries to pull us back.

Which returns us to a point I made to you earlier. The Christians are well positioned to be totally captured by a false messiah, not even the anti Christ but a "fake" Jesus returning. The "End Times" playing out before us.. I see it as people who wrote a book about what they would do - then doing it. There are theories that even suggest the year of the world is not 2023 - rather 5999. One year left until "The End." Other theories suggest we lost 600-800 years and "time" was erased. Totally possible.

The goal to me is not to remain here.. we come here, we participate as our personalities see fit, then we move on.

Anything trying to keep humans on Earth, to what end is this desire of theirs?

Balance is the "Narrow Path" back to "God Consciousness."

In the New Testament it is presented that "Only through Jesus" can one get back to God. Ain't that just great. What if I am unable to learn about the Bible for some reason, previously before technology you'd arguably have millions of people who'd never heard a damned thing about this - did they all just die and go no where?

Balance is the path I feel, because the Path must go left, or right.. it must choose between the duality and take what it needs to keep moving forward in self creation, refinement, so forth.

We are not to ignore the duality either, this is nearly impossible and a journey to no where in my opinion. We must take what is given, and make from it what we will. This reflects on our soul and the personality.

Perhaps I was a gang banger as a young man, then ran a homestead and provided shelter for battered women and children later in life? Perhaps I drank and drove, killing someone, but then made my life mission to help people with substance abuse?

The traditional religions make up all sorts of attachment to anything we do. Sins, good and bad behavior. All externally placed, though not unreasonable to the internal moral compass. However, as long as you submit to me - from the perspective of their Gods - I will forgive you and love you in the "after" life.

Anyone who wants your submission is worth questioning.

When taking down a garden at end of season, do you folks gold it on itself to let the leaves and such break down and add to the soil or remove whole plant?

Mildew covered leaves and stuff yea need to go.. but the rest should be useful for next year I figure.

Reign in Hell, or Serve in Heaven?

Neither to me.

There is a discussion group for this channel, you can join through the pinned message or through "join discussion" when you bring up the channel itself on your app/computer.

Open discussion in the chat group, I am trying to write more than forward in this group. Everyone is welcome to share ideas, and good debates will be posted to the channel.

The Diversity of Ideas, Inclusion of Thoughts. This is the fuel of the Bonfire of Dreams.

Is Tartaria an "Anti-White" Psyop?
(Original Post Here)

The author of this channel, Thuletide, claims that Tartaria must be an "anti-White psyop" because of his very poor and misinformed understanding of what the theory is, which he summarizes as "White people couldn't have possibly built neo-classical architecture in the 1800s because of the lower technology, therefore European ingenuity is attributed to a global civilization" (Not his belief, but how he wrongly interprets the theory). Furthermore he draws a parallel between Tartaria, and the WEF proposed New World Order, a global empire that maintains peace, with free food and energy, which he then concludes that this theory is used to promote such New World Order. Let's explore this argument.

Before I proceed I must warn this information may be perceived as offensive to non-Aryan readers, but this is simply the truth and must not be taken in any harsh way. On first glance it seems as if there is no racial element to this theory - which is simply not the case after further investigation.

TARTARIA was the largest country to ever exist until it was annihilated by the Roman Empire in the 19th century. It was the empire of Aryans, which stretched from South America, through India to Europe, covering an area of tens of millions of square kilometers. In order to coverup the existence of this empire, Jesuit historians, namely Joseph Scaliger, have falsely documented this Empire under several different names, stretching them over 5 different millennia, some examples include, The Golden Horde, Babylonians, Huns, Egyptians, Scythia, and even Proto Indo Europeans or the "Aryans" of the Hindu Vedas. From extensive research it can only be concluded that all of these Empires, which we are told existed between five to one thousand years ago, all in fact existed at the same time and were one unified Empire which in the middle ages was known as "Tartaria".

This was a country founded by Aryans thousands of years ago who migrated southwards into Asia following a cataclysm after having landed on Earth in the North Pole, which was a continent known to them as "Da'Aria" on ancient Rus-Sanskrit language, by other cultures it was known under several other names such as "Hyperborea" by the Greeks, "Thule" by the Germanics, "Shambhala" by the Tibetans, among many more. Sometime in the 17th century this continent was wiped off the maps, not new maps were being forged which maliciously neglected to include this land.

These Aryans colonized the entire planet, establishing a global empire. That's why all around the world all of the indigenous non-white cultures have old legends about white gods, Aryans that came to them and showed them how to build cities, and shared knowledge with them, such as the Mayan God Votan, known by the same name as the Germanics, a traveler God who is the most wise. That's why ancient rulers everywhere were tall, fair skinned, and mostly blond, blue eyes. You can find them among the ruling class of ancient India, China, Persia, Armenia, Sumeria, Egypt, and other non-white cultures. Then there the Chachapoya of Peru the tall white race (Peru was named after Perun). All of the gods, goddesses, great rulers, heroes and warriors of Ancient Greece are specifically described as white skin, blonde hair, blue eyes. So to claim that this theory is in any way anti-white, is just as ludicrous as claiming that the history of Western Colonialism in the 15th-19th centuries is, which on the surface appears to be the same narrative, until one realizes that Western Colonialism was really Rothschild-Jesuit expansionism, under the guise of European imperialism, not led by Europeans, but by the (((Bible people))), in a campaign to take over colonized lands of Tartaria.

The Mongol Empire Was a Myth Invented In 1908 by a Mongol Nationalist Named Baavuday Tsend Gun (Part 2)
(Part 1)

And ultimately the biggest rebuttal is that, this so called Mongol Empire was according to historians was the BIGGEST on the planet, and supposedly brought forth such a scale of death and destruction that it lead to ecological change - today from them remains what? Mongolia is one of the least populated countries in Asia, eclipsed by both of it's neighbors hundreds of times over.

So Where are all the foreign Mongol loanwords in Russian? The Mongolian language has dozens of Russian words for every one supposed Mongol word in Russian. Contrary to the claims of Fascist WW2 propaganda, there is in fact no evidence to support Mongolian genetics in Eastern Europeans, only the opposite of Mongols in fact being partly Russian, this can be attested not only through genetic study, but through the visual phenotype of many Mongolian people who often (though not necessarily commonly) resemble Europeans, even sometimes having blue or green eyes and lighter hair.

If the Mongol Empire were real, then it was the ONLY one to not leave a single, linguistic, genetic, cultural, or archeological trace. The myth of the Mongol Empire is one of complete delusion from one delusional zealous nationalist named Baavuday Tsend Gun

Lastly I would like to add that I write all of this without any hostility towards Mongolia or it's people and traditions. I am merely exposing the flaws of Jesuit history and the Scaligerian chronology. The word Mongol is not of Mongolian origin and was only recently introduced, the Mongols who live in modern day Mongolia have never called themselves such, but rather by their local ethnic names such as Oirats and Khalka. If you want to know who Genghis Khan really was (He was a White Russian), and the Real Mongol Empire (Tartaria), read these posts. The Mongol Empire was nothing more than a country called "Tartaria" by westerners. Tartaria was inhabited predominantly by Pagan Slavs, but also Turks Huns, Bulgars, Balts, Finns, Uralics, among hundreds of many other Pagan ethnic groups who had banded together to defend against the invaders. The real hostility here is against Slavic/Aryan people by the enemies who have been relentlessly destroying true history for the past millennia.

Recorded history is only 1000 years old and the current year is 722. All of human history happened only recently in the middle ages. Everything you have been taught is a lie!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Secret_History_of_the_Mongols

Who was the Real Christ?

He did not live 2000+ years ago.
He was neither Jewish nor King of the Jews.
He spoke neither Aramaic nor Hebrew.
He was not executed in Jerusalem.
He was not "Jesus" or "Yeshuah".
He was not the "son of God", Yahweh.

His name was Radomir.
Everything you know about him was twisted and deformed by Jesuit historians in the last few centuries.

He lived 900 years ago.
He was a Rus'Aryan, on Slavic Sanskrit his name, Radost' Mira, means "Joy/Sunshine of the World".
He spoke Slavic.
He was a mortal human like the rest of us, fighting the New World Order.
Born in Crimea, he was executed in Constantinople on Jewish holiday of Pesach, in 1086 (on the modern Jewish calendar), Summer 6594.

Christ has NOTHING to do with Christianity, which was created by the controllers to enslave the masses.

He was a Vedic Aryan missionary, his mission was to enlighten the Jews that their God Yahweh was the ENEMY. Only Judas Iscariot acknowledged his message, for that he was defamed by the Church.

This Mudflood research fellow has some good things to muse on.