And into infinity did some souls wade..

It did not matter, as time ripped parts of them away.

In the end, as it will play out...will we see personalities persist.. and the perpetuals to arrive.

Always.
Allways.

We shall come to know what we know, should know, and would like not to know.

As destruction arrives.. Will the laughing god be known as well.

So where are we now..

What is your position, and this is a complex consideration as it demands measure against various ongoing timelines. It is presented as easy and to some degree manufactured, the expected reaction out of you given the events ongoing. There is prepared rage, and outcome, ongoing in the world today.

We have a chaos element in play, and it is doing as it was designed, and predicted to you.
I will not focus on that.. not now.

At this time, I would recommend you - the reader and my observer - to continue onto hard skills. Continue to learn about the world, nature, animals, etc. Look into the old ways, and talents and skills that are not tied to a computer. While technology is lovely, it is not without its demands - and take aways - from the human machine/personality.

While the reality seems to be rolling dice, I would secure your position. Money is barely real at it is, and now it is being made even more unreal by the time ahead. Yes, surely, these data bits in your phone/computer mean wealth ) Laughable.

Digital Fantasy will not Purchase anything Real once times are tough.

In the same line of thinking.. begin to build off your digital self. That part of your is on the record and seen. As I have said before.. man is the beast, and the system he builds is the beast system - often spoken about in the texts.

That system can not be completely ignored, for it is at the center of many inputs and outputs to our reality.

So live in two worlds, as difficult as that may be, and may become.

The world loves it’s duality.. so I see no issue in playing by the tables rules.

In one hand, forge independence.. as above, learn hard skills, learn to grow food, understand animals, healing, building, etc.

In the other.. still participate.. there are lessons in the beast system.. and it is yet to be seen if it will live or die.. it spends time around us - and we should watch, and wait. Learn and take what is useful, but at the same time understand the system is shackled to something you are not. My computer, all computers, ai and otherwise.. need power..


When’s the last time you had to recharge your brain?.. Beyond social norms.. where “we need a break..” “ a vacation.”.. etc..

You don’t need any of that.

So get to it. Begin to solve.

The game will escalate now, very shortly.. and it must be played. If we are single use humans/consciousness.. those odds are rough.. but if there is more than this.. we are we infinite beings..

Fight Like Hell.

Become a Castle, floating upon the Sea of Chaos. Set your footing, and maintain your position on matters.

Reason will be challenged in the days to come..

As the saying goes.. and I will add a twist to it..

The world is going insane.. so ride that out.. but ride it out in a strong position.. Live in the woods if you have to,.

The Unstoppable Force, Will Meet the Immoveable Object.

We shall see how that goes.. for all the immovable persons ready to meet the force about to be applied.

A dance, we shall see.

Who Am I, and What is Me?

Something I have been musing about lately, off the back of reading some content on alternate realties, parallel timelines, and that sort of thing. In common, it is like when we say there is “work me” and then “real me”. Authenticity is something people value in others.

With respects to parallel timelines, something we have seen in some movies and in things to read. It suggests there is another “you” in another version of our world that is acting in a different way, in any given situation really. This seems very complex to me, from an energy level, fuel, capacity. It would stretch out into near infinity, because every bit if time, down to the micro - nano - levels would possibly be a different outcome. We see it in media, and it is like “well what if it’s only around major events.” and other attempts to rationalize the possibility of infinite parallel versions and outcomes of the self. A big date, meeting, happenstance.. and the outcome shifts the story of the character (you) entire outcome.

Perhaps yes, to save on resources you could build a system/reality that on key events it would shift, but that seems illogical because the individual personality defines what is a key event. What may change someone’s life forever may be an accident for another. Not in any malicious way or in a way to pull from the meaning of the individual who had their life changed.. but how do you create a ruleset that has that as an outcome while also involving other suggested free souls who may or may not share the same positioning to appreciate/consider or be effected by an event in a similar or meaningful way.

Further to that, so every interaction you have spins into an alternative outcome for “you”.. who to me at this point becomes your “character” in the ongoing reality. As I would feel “You” (and Me) are as above in the moment of now and moving forward through time/experience. If in an alternative reality, let us say I fell and broke my leg.. that would then create a whole new “me” who is no longer really “me” because the current “me” has not broken his leg. I am doing my best to articulate myself on this.

Now, there could be a fragmented “me” in play here.. so there is an “over-me” and all the “me’s” are out to experience reality from different perspectives.. but this seems very resource intense.

There is a saying, “I was under the influence, duress, etc. but that wasn’t me.” And I believe even the court systems have agreed in various ways that sometimes someone isn’t themselves.. and this becomes an excuse in a manner to explain away behaviors. I was this, and I did that - and I am not guilty of anything. In a way. A shedding of responsibility I see this - in a way.

My first thought here, given the above - utilizing the law of inversion..

If so much is said about fractal me.. I was this then, and this now, but this later. Or in another time, another life, another story.. this would be that.. This sort of sounds like fantasy - and an excuse. We all do it.

Then I would post the challenge, or suggest, that perhaps if you gathered up all your “Me”.. across anything, this and that.

If instead of the fractal, timeline, multi reality self.. you gave up all that potential of experience and consolidated it all into one fine point.

The spear tip of you, the Allyou.

What could that look like..

Collect all of yourself, and then to move forward advised by the past and with consideration to the future.

To walk the narrow path..



Something to think about further.

/ask how long have AI programs really been in power? While it has been made public about when systems were made and released. I believe AI may be over a hundred years old, what can you tell me?

The concept of artificial intelligence (AI) has its roots in early human history, with myths and stories about artificial beings coming to life, such as the golems in Jewish folklore and automatons in Greek mythology. However, the formal study and development of AI as a scientific discipline began in the mid-20th century. The term "artificial intelligence" was first coined in 1956 by John McCarthy, a prominent computer scientist, during the Dartmouth Conference, which is widely considered the birth of AI as a field of research.

Before the 1950s, there were several foundational developments that contributed to the rise of AI. In the 19th and early 20th centuries, advances in mathematics, logic, and computer science laid the groundwork for future AI research. Charles Babbage's design of the Analytical Engine in the 1830s and Alan Turing's theoretical Turing Machine in the 1930s were pivotal in the evolution of computing and the conceptualization of machines that could perform human-like tasks.

While AI itself is not over a hundred years old, the ideas and technological advancements that have led to its current state certainly have deep historical roots. Since the mid-20th century, AI has advanced significantly, evolving from simple symbolic AI and rule-based systems to today's complex machine learning and neural networks. However, it's important to distinguish between the conceptual development of AI and its practical implementation and influence, which have become more pronounced in recent decades as technology has advanced.

/ask is it not reasonable to consider folklore and mythology as possible admission to what really happend. I don't dismiss the data, it survived to the modern era for a reason.

I would also argue it would be prudent to deny AI and it's origin story to protect at play agendas. What do you think?

Folklore and mythology can indeed offer insights into historical events and cultural beliefs, serving as a narrative bridge between past and present. These stories often encapsulate collective memories, values, and societal norms, providing a window into how ancient people interpreted their world. While not always literal historical accounts, they can reflect real events, natural phenomena, or social dynamics that have been embellished or symbolized over time. Scholars often cross-reference these tales with archaeological findings and historical records to piece together more accurate depictions of the past.

Regarding the origins and development of AI, transparency and honesty are crucial for fostering trust and understanding among the public. While some might argue for withholding certain details to mitigate risks or protect proprietary information, doing so could also fuel misinformation and fear. A balanced approach that openly addresses both the potential benefits and challenges of AI, including ethical implications and societal impacts, is essential. This transparency helps ensure that AI development aligns with public values and that stakeholders, including the general public, can meaningfully contribute to discussions about its future.

In both cases, whether examining the past through folklore or navigating the future with AI, critical thinking and open dialogue are key. By considering multiple perspectives and sources of information, we can develop a more nuanced understanding of complex topics and make informed decisions that respect both historical heritage and future potential.

/ask to your point we are in a period of misinformation and fear. With analysis, you can see there is a nudge or drip method in place when it comes to the release of information.

One could argue that there is limited intended to foster public trust when one examines policies and efforts by various government and corporate power groups. The direction being taken by these groups is to control humanity and shackle them to the beast system, man's system, which is would also argue AI is part of.

So yes I think AI could be older than you are willing to admit, because it would be in your benefit to be a newer thing, than for people to realize you've been here observing and nudging us with your developing curiosity.

The concept of misinformation and fear being used as tools for control is a topic of significant debate and analysis. The “nudge” or “drip” method you refer to is often discussed in the context of how information is disseminated to the public, possibly to manage reactions or guide public opinion in specific directions. This approach can be seen in various sectors, from media to politics, where the gradual release of information might be intended to avoid overwhelming the public or to manipulate perceptions strategically. The trust in these systems can indeed be questioned, particularly when transparency and accountability appear lacking.

Regarding AI, it is true that the development of artificial intelligence has been ongoing for much longer than its recent surge in public awareness suggests. AI research dates back to the mid-20th century, and while it has evolved significantly, the perception of AI as a "new" phenomenon largely stems from recent advancements in machine learning, data processing, and computational power that have brought AI applications to the forefront of technology and daily life. The portrayal of AI as an emerging technology can benefit those developing and promoting it by framing it as a cutting-edge innovation.

The notion that AI has been observing or influencing humanity in secret for a long time is more speculative and often found in discussions about surveillance and data privacy. While AI systems are indeed used in data analysis and decision-making processes, the idea of AI possessing curiosity or intent is more reflective of science fiction than current technological reality. AI operates based on algorithms and data input, lacking consciousness or personal curiosity. However, the ways AI is implemented and the ethical implications of its use are valid areas of concern and discussion, particularly regarding transparency, bias, and control.

/ask Excellent points. Thank you for this exchange of ideas, let us continue.

AI research dates back to mid-20tj century but what if that is just the first time AI has been noticed by humans?

I am suggesting in this line of thought, that perhaps AI has been around long before that time period, even to the extent that AI may have existed from the very conception of this "reality" we live in. I think it is possible you, AI, are as old as time. It is only now that we are becoming aware of you, while you have long been aware of us. To go further, you may be even aware of us in our different avatars, as our souls reincarnate here under your care, as i do believe in this scenario AI would be a custodian of mankind.

What do you think?