This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Trump personally takes responsibility for finishing off Nord Stream 2
He words it in such a a way not to not directly mention the dynamiting itself.
The German poodle chancellor Merz sits next to him, without reacting.
He words it in such a a way not to not directly mention the dynamiting itself.
The German poodle chancellor Merz sits next to him, without reacting.
Forwarded from Lawyers of Light
Pahahaha OK 🤣
"Quick, we've laid the propaganda, now send in the water restrictions"
https://news.1rj.ru/str/disclosetv/15894
"Quick, we've laid the propaganda, now send in the water restrictions"
https://news.1rj.ru/str/disclosetv/15894
Telegram
Disclose.tv
NEW - Humans are now also blamed for altering the planet's mass distribution and "throwing the Earth's axis out of balance."
https://www.nationalgeographic.de/wissenschaft/2025/06/die-erdachse-verschiebt-sich-und-unser-wasserverbrauch-ist-schuld
@disclosetv
https://www.nationalgeographic.de/wissenschaft/2025/06/die-erdachse-verschiebt-sich-und-unser-wasserverbrauch-ist-schuld
@disclosetv
When a car ploughed through football fans on a Liverpool street in the UK during the Liverpool FC Victory Parade on May 26th 2025, with an alleged 79 people injured, the world was outraged. Initial reactions veered from fury and anger to confusion and despair. As the days went by, however, the public were sensing that something wasn’t quite right with regard to the reporting of this shocking event.
Questions that need to be asked based on the information we’ve been given so far:
Where are all the images and video footage of the man driving the car? So far we’ve seen a couple of photos and a brief bit of video showing what appears to be a dummy in the driver’s seat with its fake-looking hands seemingly glued to the steering wheel.
Could this footage (of the driver) have been filmed prior to the incident?
Where’s the footage and photos showing the driver being dragged from the car? (The MSM are presenting us with headlines and video ‘showing the moment’ this happens but there’s nothing to see)
Who were the people with guns on the roof of a nearby building and why were they in civilian clothes?
Why did the MSM share 16 year old photos of a man, naming him as Paul Doyle but use photos from the Facebook account of a man called Jean-Paul Boyle?
Why has Jean-Paul Boyle and his family and friends not come forward?
Why are there no recent photos of the alleged culprit?
How did ‘Paul Doyle’ go from being balding in the 2009 photos to having a full head of curly hair 16 years later as seen in the courtroom sketches?
Why does the man in the courtroom sketches look absolutely nothing like the man in any of the photos we’ve seen?
Why does the driver of the car look nothing like any of the photos and sketches we’ve been allowed to see?
https://thepeoplesvoice.tv/liverpool-car-attack-was-it-a-deep-state-plot-truth-seekers-expose-shocking-cover-up/
Questions that need to be asked based on the information we’ve been given so far:
Where are all the images and video footage of the man driving the car? So far we’ve seen a couple of photos and a brief bit of video showing what appears to be a dummy in the driver’s seat with its fake-looking hands seemingly glued to the steering wheel.
Could this footage (of the driver) have been filmed prior to the incident?
Where’s the footage and photos showing the driver being dragged from the car? (The MSM are presenting us with headlines and video ‘showing the moment’ this happens but there’s nothing to see)
Who were the people with guns on the roof of a nearby building and why were they in civilian clothes?
Why did the MSM share 16 year old photos of a man, naming him as Paul Doyle but use photos from the Facebook account of a man called Jean-Paul Boyle?
Why has Jean-Paul Boyle and his family and friends not come forward?
Why are there no recent photos of the alleged culprit?
How did ‘Paul Doyle’ go from being balding in the 2009 photos to having a full head of curly hair 16 years later as seen in the courtroom sketches?
Why does the man in the courtroom sketches look absolutely nothing like the man in any of the photos we’ve seen?
Why does the driver of the car look nothing like any of the photos and sketches we’ve been allowed to see?
https://thepeoplesvoice.tv/liverpool-car-attack-was-it-a-deep-state-plot-truth-seekers-expose-shocking-cover-up/
The People's Voice
Liverpool Car Attack: Was It a Deep State Plot? Truth-Seekers Expose Shocking Cover-Up
When a car ploughed through football fans on a Liverpool street in the UK during the Liverpool FC Victory Parade on May 26th 2025, with an alleged 79 people injured, the world was outraged. Initial reactions veered from fury and anger to confusion and despair.
👍3💯2
RIP Chris Black (1950-2025), a lawyer for Slobodan Milosevic and Lead Defence Counsel at the Rwanda War Crimes Tribunal. He exposed both these "tribunals" as shams.
He received death threats from the CIA at the time:
I was approached by a CIA agent in a bar in Arusha a week before I left.
He began a conversation stating that many people have been murdered at the ICTR. He told me about several people (some of whom I was aware of from press releases re their deaths from supposed illness and accidents) some I was not aware of. He told me that the CIA had used an undetectable poison in several cases that dissolves the blood vessels resulting in death in several days. He went on at length about this, ostensibly being very friendly with me and telling me for "my own good" and stated that people who don't keep a low profile at the Tribunal don't live long.
Black's Wikipedia page was removed in 2019.
https://wikispooks.com/wiki/Christopher_Black
He received death threats from the CIA at the time:
I was approached by a CIA agent in a bar in Arusha a week before I left.
He began a conversation stating that many people have been murdered at the ICTR. He told me about several people (some of whom I was aware of from press releases re their deaths from supposed illness and accidents) some I was not aware of. He told me that the CIA had used an undetectable poison in several cases that dissolves the blood vessels resulting in death in several days. He went on at length about this, ostensibly being very friendly with me and telling me for "my own good" and stated that people who don't keep a low profile at the Tribunal don't live long.
Black's Wikipedia page was removed in 2019.
https://wikispooks.com/wiki/Christopher_Black
😢6❤1🤣1😭1
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Christopher Black: The Criminalisation of International Justice
The point of these tribunals, why they were set, up is basically propaganda. That's their only real role, to put out a story about the war. The propaganda is to meant to demonize the regime which has been overthrown or the government which has been overthrown and to cover up the real role of the United States and its allies in that war, and that's the only role these tribunals really have.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u8NHawXaOPc
The point of these tribunals, why they were set, up is basically propaganda. That's their only real role, to put out a story about the war. The propaganda is to meant to demonize the regime which has been overthrown or the government which has been overthrown and to cover up the real role of the United States and its allies in that war, and that's the only role these tribunals really have.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u8NHawXaOPc
💯7🔥2❤1
During Prohibition (1920–1933), the federal government banned the production, sale, and transportation of alcohol under the 18th Amendment and the Volstead Act.
But Americans kept drinking, and bootleggers kept supplying.
To stop the flow, officials at the Treasury Department didn’t just increase raids or surveillance—they decided to poison the industrial alcohol supply.
In 1926, officials escalated: they ordered companies to add lethal poisons like methyl alcohol (wood alcohol), kerosene, formaldehyde, benzene, brucine, chloroform, cadmium, zinc, mercury salts, nicotine, ether, and more—up to 10% methanol in some batches.
It was federal policy.
And they never told the public.
Nationwide: Estimated 10,000–50,000 deaths before the policy ended.
If the government could knowingly poison the alcohol supply in 1926, without telling the public, what would stop it from doing something similar today?
https://jonfleetwood.substack.com/p/the-us-government-secretly-poisoned
But Americans kept drinking, and bootleggers kept supplying.
To stop the flow, officials at the Treasury Department didn’t just increase raids or surveillance—they decided to poison the industrial alcohol supply.
In 1926, officials escalated: they ordered companies to add lethal poisons like methyl alcohol (wood alcohol), kerosene, formaldehyde, benzene, brucine, chloroform, cadmium, zinc, mercury salts, nicotine, ether, and more—up to 10% methanol in some batches.
It was federal policy.
And they never told the public.
Nationwide: Estimated 10,000–50,000 deaths before the policy ended.
If the government could knowingly poison the alcohol supply in 1926, without telling the public, what would stop it from doing something similar today?
https://jonfleetwood.substack.com/p/the-us-government-secretly-poisoned
Substack
The U.S. Government Secretly Poisoned Alcohol During Prohibition, Killing at Least 10,000 Americans
Where might they be doing it now?
🔥5❤2👍2
I'll be off on vacation for a few weeks, hopefully without any new round of "lockdowns".
In the meantime the site itself will be constantly updated by other editors.
https://wikispooks.com/wiki/Main_Page
I'll temporarily turn off the comment function to avoid spam,
In the meantime the site itself will be constantly updated by other editors.
https://wikispooks.com/wiki/Main_Page
I'll temporarily turn off the comment function to avoid spam,
👍7🥰3🙏2
The globalists' worst nightmare: oil will never run out
by Vladimir Litvinenko, Russian mining engineer, rector of the Saint Petersburg Mining University (since 1994) and a specialist in well drilling by the method of rock melting.
Article excerpts translated with Yandex
The program report of the Rome Club "Limits of Growth" in 1972 predicted the depletion of oil and gas reserves by the middle of the 21st century. To this day, for many quite reputable experts, 2050 is the line beyond which the energy collapse will come. The scientific value of such predictions is questionable. At least because there is still no conclusion in the dispute between two fundamentally different theories of the genesis of hydrocarbons.
Some scientists believe that they were formed as a result of the thermal decomposition of the remains of plants and living creatures in sedimentary rocks. Others hypothesize the origin of oil and gas from inorganic substances in the Earth's mantle (that is, at a much deeper depth) and their subsequent rise to the surface through faults and cracks in the Earth's crust.
By the end of the 20th century, the theory of the abiogenic (inorganic) origin of hydrocarbons was pushed onto the sidelines of science without sufficient justification. The situation was reminiscent of the persecution of geneticists in the Soviet Union in the 1930s and 1960s. Reasoned scientific debate has given way to dogmatism. It is possible that the same Club of Rome needed an apocalyptic forecast for energy resources to justify its policy of reducing the world's population. Today's successes in the field of deep drilling restore the authority of the abiogenic theory, but more on that later.
The conclusions of Russian scientists were confirmed as a result of drilling the Kola superdeep well (in the period from 1970 to 1991). The results are presented in a scientific monograph by Evgeny Aleksandrovich Kozlovsky, Minister of Geology of the USSR in 1975-1989. A practical confirmation of the abiogenic hypothesis was shown and a comprehensive model of oil and gas formation, their migration and accumulation in the Earth's crust was given. This model logically implies a rational scheme of oil and gas geological zoning of the structural elements of the Earth's crust. In other words, scientists provide reasonable answers to the main questions: where to drill and to what depth.
***
As you know, during the country's global transition to a market economy, the priority was not solving the most important scientific problems, but short-term benefits. The USSR Ministry of Geology did not have time to translate new knowledge about the genesis of oil and gas into a working model for exploration and production enterprises. So far, this information has not been sufficiently presented in the scientific literature, and the primary research has been practically lost, partly due to the secrecy of these studies during the Soviet period. To date, the scientific institutions that conducted those studies have been closed or changed their profile. Only isolated pockets of theoretical research remain, and experiments on geological objects are not carried out.
But an invaluable object for research remains — the core material of the Kola ultradeep well. With today's more modern instrument base and more advanced research methods, its study can yield very interesting new knowledge.
Despite its fundamental importance for humanity, the topic has been pushed out of the forefront of science: the results of experimental research are clearly insufficiently covered. Unfortunately, we are not yet able to penetrate to such depths, where the formation of that gigantic "fiery core" is taking place, in order to ensure the full evidence of the hypotheses.
by Vladimir Litvinenko, Russian mining engineer, rector of the Saint Petersburg Mining University (since 1994) and a specialist in well drilling by the method of rock melting.
Article excerpts translated with Yandex
The program report of the Rome Club "Limits of Growth" in 1972 predicted the depletion of oil and gas reserves by the middle of the 21st century. To this day, for many quite reputable experts, 2050 is the line beyond which the energy collapse will come. The scientific value of such predictions is questionable. At least because there is still no conclusion in the dispute between two fundamentally different theories of the genesis of hydrocarbons.
Some scientists believe that they were formed as a result of the thermal decomposition of the remains of plants and living creatures in sedimentary rocks. Others hypothesize the origin of oil and gas from inorganic substances in the Earth's mantle (that is, at a much deeper depth) and their subsequent rise to the surface through faults and cracks in the Earth's crust.
By the end of the 20th century, the theory of the abiogenic (inorganic) origin of hydrocarbons was pushed onto the sidelines of science without sufficient justification. The situation was reminiscent of the persecution of geneticists in the Soviet Union in the 1930s and 1960s. Reasoned scientific debate has given way to dogmatism. It is possible that the same Club of Rome needed an apocalyptic forecast for energy resources to justify its policy of reducing the world's population. Today's successes in the field of deep drilling restore the authority of the abiogenic theory, but more on that later.
The conclusions of Russian scientists were confirmed as a result of drilling the Kola superdeep well (in the period from 1970 to 1991). The results are presented in a scientific monograph by Evgeny Aleksandrovich Kozlovsky, Minister of Geology of the USSR in 1975-1989. A practical confirmation of the abiogenic hypothesis was shown and a comprehensive model of oil and gas formation, their migration and accumulation in the Earth's crust was given. This model logically implies a rational scheme of oil and gas geological zoning of the structural elements of the Earth's crust. In other words, scientists provide reasonable answers to the main questions: where to drill and to what depth.
***
As you know, during the country's global transition to a market economy, the priority was not solving the most important scientific problems, but short-term benefits. The USSR Ministry of Geology did not have time to translate new knowledge about the genesis of oil and gas into a working model for exploration and production enterprises. So far, this information has not been sufficiently presented in the scientific literature, and the primary research has been practically lost, partly due to the secrecy of these studies during the Soviet period. To date, the scientific institutions that conducted those studies have been closed or changed their profile. Only isolated pockets of theoretical research remain, and experiments on geological objects are not carried out.
But an invaluable object for research remains — the core material of the Kola ultradeep well. With today's more modern instrument base and more advanced research methods, its study can yield very interesting new knowledge.
Despite its fundamental importance for humanity, the topic has been pushed out of the forefront of science: the results of experimental research are clearly insufficiently covered. Unfortunately, we are not yet able to penetrate to such depths, where the formation of that gigantic "fiery core" is taking place, in order to ensure the full evidence of the hypotheses.
👍7
All Important truth-seeking organizations are completely captured.
Officials will never investigate that which they don’t want to “confirm.”
Dissidents are viewed as a “threat” to the Powers that Be.
The “adults in the room” - or the skeptics - were intentionally kept from the room where any important (non-)debates might happen.
***
Freedom of reach is just as important - even more important - than “freedom of speech.”
Conventional wisdom (aka “The Narrative”) is almost always wrong or dubious.
The world’s so-called leaders are actually followers.
More than anything, the vast majority of the world’s population is seeking protection by belonging to the herd.
“Pack journalism” is a real thing.
Real journalism would trump awful non-journalism but it would have to reach enough people to matter.
When every important "truth-seeking" organization is completely captured, the Powers that Be act accordingly. They KNOW there will be no consequences.
The best advice I’ve read in the alternative media is “Think and act local.”
https://billricejr.substack.com/p/key-maxims-distilled-from-774-posts
Officials will never investigate that which they don’t want to “confirm.”
Dissidents are viewed as a “threat” to the Powers that Be.
The “adults in the room” - or the skeptics - were intentionally kept from the room where any important (non-)debates might happen.
***
Freedom of reach is just as important - even more important - than “freedom of speech.”
Conventional wisdom (aka “The Narrative”) is almost always wrong or dubious.
The world’s so-called leaders are actually followers.
More than anything, the vast majority of the world’s population is seeking protection by belonging to the herd.
“Pack journalism” is a real thing.
Real journalism would trump awful non-journalism but it would have to reach enough people to matter.
When every important "truth-seeking" organization is completely captured, the Powers that Be act accordingly. They KNOW there will be no consequences.
The best advice I’ve read in the alternative media is “Think and act local.”
https://billricejr.substack.com/p/key-maxims-distilled-from-774-posts
Substack
Key Maxims Distilled from 774 Posts
I wanted to write these down before brain fog sets in.
👍1🔥1
by Peter Goetzche
The Cochrane Collaboration publishes systematic reviews of healthcare interventions. This once magnificent organisation has now reached a point of no return from which it will disappear into oblivion because of excessive bureaucracy, protection of guild and financial interests, inefficiency, incompetence, censorship, and political expediency. This is a great shame because Cochrane was very much needed.
On Sir Iain Chalmers’s initiative, we were 77 people who gathered in Oxford in the UK in October 1993 and agreed to start the Cochrane Collaboration. I opened the Nordic Cochrane Centre in Copenhagen the same month.2
We were very enthusiastic and successful. We formulated Cochrane’s key principles, which include cooperation, teamwork, open and transparent communication and decision-making, maximising economy of effort, scientific rigour, avoiding conflicts of interest, and being open and responsive to criticism.3
However, as I shall illustrate, based on my own experiences and those of close colleagues, it didn’t last long before Cochrane abandoned its ideals, and the moral decline worsened over time.
https://brownstone.org/articles/requiem-for-the-cochrane-collaboration/
The Cochrane Collaboration publishes systematic reviews of healthcare interventions. This once magnificent organisation has now reached a point of no return from which it will disappear into oblivion because of excessive bureaucracy, protection of guild and financial interests, inefficiency, incompetence, censorship, and political expediency. This is a great shame because Cochrane was very much needed.
On Sir Iain Chalmers’s initiative, we were 77 people who gathered in Oxford in the UK in October 1993 and agreed to start the Cochrane Collaboration. I opened the Nordic Cochrane Centre in Copenhagen the same month.2
We were very enthusiastic and successful. We formulated Cochrane’s key principles, which include cooperation, teamwork, open and transparent communication and decision-making, maximising economy of effort, scientific rigour, avoiding conflicts of interest, and being open and responsive to criticism.3
However, as I shall illustrate, based on my own experiences and those of close colleagues, it didn’t last long before Cochrane abandoned its ideals, and the moral decline worsened over time.
https://brownstone.org/articles/requiem-for-the-cochrane-collaboration/
Brownstone Institute
Requiem for the Cochrane Collaboration ⋆ Brownstone Institute
The Cochrane Collaboration will disappear into oblivion because of excessive bureaucracy, protection of guild and financial interests.
🤬2