Happy St Patrick's Day! May you be in heaven before the devil knows your dead!!!

HAPPY ST PATRICKS DAY MARCH 17TH, 2023 ☘️

YOU MAY BE WONDERING WHAT IS THE HISTORY BEHIND THIS DAY…
SAINT PATRICK IS THE PATRON SAINT OF IRELAND, KNOWN FOR BRINGING CHRISTIANITY TO THE COUNTRY IN THE FIFTH CENTURY, BUT WAS ACTUALLY BORN IN ROMAN BRITAIN, NOT IRELAND.

ALTHOUGH AT THIS TIME, BLUE WAS THE COLOR ASSOCIATED WITH IRELAND, AFTER 1641 WHEN THE IRISH FOUGHT THE ENGLISH, GREEN BECAME THE COLOR FOR IRELAND AND THEIR FLAG.
LEPRECHAUNS? THEY WERE NOT ASSOCIATED WITH THE HOLIDAY UNTIL 1959, WHEN DISNEY RELEASED A FILM ABOUT AN OLD IRISH MAN AND HIS LEGRECHAUN FRIENDS (SMALL STATURE MEN GOOD AT MAKING SHOES).
IT WAS BELIEVED THAT ST PATRICK USED THE SHAMROCK TO EXPLAIN THE TRINITY WHILE HE WAS SPREADING CHRISTIANITY INTO IRELAND.

Lincoln assassinated for going against the globalist central banking [cabal]. [they] didn't have the reach when Jefferson and Jackson eliminated the 1st and 2nd central bank of the US. By the time Lincoln was in office, they did. And we've talked many times about President USS Grant and his signing of the illegal Act of 1871 after the Civil War. here many times before. Jekyl Island, the Titanic (Olympic) and 1913.

Sound familiar? Think JFK (😉) and again 7 times with Trump....

Father McTeigue nails it here.

The Brief History of Our Annihilation:

Twitter Files #19 - The Great COVID19 Lie Machine, 11 AM EDT right after Badlands Daily! https://rumble.com/v2dkar2-twitter-files-19-the-great-covid-19-lie-machine.html?mref=nmtun&mc=4m0ok

Odious debt, also known as illegitimate debt, is a legal theory in international law which states that the national debt incurred by a despotic regime should not be enforceable.0 It is when a country's government changes and the successor government does not want to pay debts incurred by the previous government on ostensibly moral grounds such as misappropriation of money.1 The Soviet state repudiated tsarist debt in 1921 using a similar rationale and legal scholars subsequently elaborated this doctrine of “odious” by arguing that sovereign debt should not be transferable to a successor government if it was incurred without consent.2