Forwarded from Russians With Attitude (pd)
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Epic escape from the Ukrainian manhunters
❤4
Forwarded from LauraAboli (Laura Aboli)
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
The difference between the men's 100m freestyle final 88 years apart.
https://news.1rj.ru/str/LauraAbolichannel
https://news.1rj.ru/str/LauraAbolichannel
🔥3
Forwarded from Eva Karene Bartlett (Yeva)
Channel I follow posted this following the increase of Ukraine's terrorist drone attacks:
"What to do when attacked by a UAV?
Signs of a UAV: a buzzing sound, the sound of a lawn mower or a moped, a silhouette visible at an altitude of up to 100 meters.
If you are outside:
🔹leave the line of sight
🔹hide in a building, shelter, basement
🔹When the ammunition is dropped, run to the side, lie down on the ground, behind the curb, in a ditch or moat, cover your head with your hands
🔹don't get up after the first explosion, roll away or crawl to the side
If you are in a car or on public transport:
🔹stop or leave the vehicle
🔹hide in a building, shelter, basement
🔹if the road is empty, accelerate to more than 135 km/h - this will allow you to escape an attack, if the drone is diving, brake sharply when it approaches
If you are in the building:
🔹move away from the windows
🔹take shelter in a basement or in a room with load-bearing walls without windows
🔹don't use the elevator
🔹Do not use your phone when a UAV is approaching"
[Memo from the Belgorod City Civil Defense and Emergencies Department]
"What to do when attacked by a UAV?
Signs of a UAV: a buzzing sound, the sound of a lawn mower or a moped, a silhouette visible at an altitude of up to 100 meters.
If you are outside:
🔹leave the line of sight
🔹hide in a building, shelter, basement
🔹When the ammunition is dropped, run to the side, lie down on the ground, behind the curb, in a ditch or moat, cover your head with your hands
🔹don't get up after the first explosion, roll away or crawl to the side
If you are in a car or on public transport:
🔹stop or leave the vehicle
🔹hide in a building, shelter, basement
🔹if the road is empty, accelerate to more than 135 km/h - this will allow you to escape an attack, if the drone is diving, brake sharply when it approaches
If you are in the building:
🔹move away from the windows
🔹take shelter in a basement or in a room with load-bearing walls without windows
🔹don't use the elevator
🔹Do not use your phone when a UAV is approaching"
[Memo from the Belgorod City Civil Defense and Emergencies Department]
Forwarded from The Awakened Species ☀️
Supposedly a picture of Statue of Liberty from Paris, France - 1886, before it was transported to America.
This statue is 305ft (93m) tall
Join @awakenedspecies
This statue is 305ft (93m) tall
Join @awakenedspecies
Forwarded from Today I Learned
TIL that while great apes can learn hundreds of sign-language words, they never ask questions.
https://ift.tt/ZtoOhfb
https://ift.tt/ZtoOhfb
Reddit
From the todayilearned community on Reddit: TIL that while great apes can learn hundreds of sign-language words, they never ask…
Explore this post and more from the todayilearned community
🤔4
Forwarded from UNITED24Media
The Kremlin has removed sailors from the abandoned Admiral Kuznetsov aircraft carrier and sent them to fight. The ship is unlikely to ever return to sea, according to Forbes.
The Admiral Kuznetsov, Russia's only aircraft carrier of its class, has not been on combat duty for eight years, and each year, the probability of its return to service grows slimmer.
Analyst David Ax notes that approximately 1,500 sailors from the aircraft carrier were reorganized into a "frigate" mechanized battalion as part of the Russian Federation's 1st Guards Tank Army. Ax emphasizes that this move illustrates the crisis within Russia’s naval forces and the general obsolescence of its large warships, many of which date back to the Cold War era.
The transfer of sailors from the Kuznetsov is another step by the Kremlin in its search for new reserves for the war in Ukraine. While Putin avoids introducing nationwide connoscription due to political risks, the Russian military is forced to redeploy ship crews to make up for losses at the front.
The decline of the Admiral Kuznetsov also underscores Russia's inability to maintain its fleet in combat readiness. In 2018, the ship was seriously damaged during the flooding of the dry dock where it was being repaired. A year later, a fire broke out on the ship, and although the plan was to return it to service by 2022, another fire in December of that year disrupted these plans once again. Currently, the aircraft carrier remains docked in Murmansk.
Ax also points out that in other countries, such ships would have been scrapped and replaced with new ones. However, due to the weakness of Russian industry, which is incapable of building modern large warships, the Admiral Kuznetsov, like most of Russia’s large ships, remains in service despite its worn-out hull and mechanisms.
Military expert Pavel Luzin emphasizes that one of the main issues lies with the engines. Most of the large marine engines for the Soviet fleet were manufactured in Ukrainian factories, and now, due to the war, Russia can no longer acquire them. Establishing domestic production has proven difficult for the Russians, further complicating the fleet’s maintenance.
The Admiral Kuznetsov, Russia's only aircraft carrier of its class, has not been on combat duty for eight years, and each year, the probability of its return to service grows slimmer.
Analyst David Ax notes that approximately 1,500 sailors from the aircraft carrier were reorganized into a "frigate" mechanized battalion as part of the Russian Federation's 1st Guards Tank Army. Ax emphasizes that this move illustrates the crisis within Russia’s naval forces and the general obsolescence of its large warships, many of which date back to the Cold War era.
The transfer of sailors from the Kuznetsov is another step by the Kremlin in its search for new reserves for the war in Ukraine. While Putin avoids introducing nationwide connoscription due to political risks, the Russian military is forced to redeploy ship crews to make up for losses at the front.
The decline of the Admiral Kuznetsov also underscores Russia's inability to maintain its fleet in combat readiness. In 2018, the ship was seriously damaged during the flooding of the dry dock where it was being repaired. A year later, a fire broke out on the ship, and although the plan was to return it to service by 2022, another fire in December of that year disrupted these plans once again. Currently, the aircraft carrier remains docked in Murmansk.
Ax also points out that in other countries, such ships would have been scrapped and replaced with new ones. However, due to the weakness of Russian industry, which is incapable of building modern large warships, the Admiral Kuznetsov, like most of Russia’s large ships, remains in service despite its worn-out hull and mechanisms.
Military expert Pavel Luzin emphasizes that one of the main issues lies with the engines. Most of the large marine engines for the Soviet fleet were manufactured in Ukrainian factories, and now, due to the war, Russia can no longer acquire them. Establishing domestic production has proven difficult for the Russians, further complicating the fleet’s maintenance.
Forwarded from The Daily Pulse
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Fluoride in Water Poses “Unreasonable Risk” to Children, Federal Judge Rules
The “conspiracy theorists” were right again.
Judge Edward Chen has ruled that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) MUST take action on water fluoridation.
He found that fluoride poses an “unreasonable risk” of reducing IQ in children, especially for pregnant women and young kids, at the current levels.
He dismissed the EPA’s argument that it’s unclear exactly how much fluoride is dangerous and instead pointed to scientific evidence showing that even the so-called “optimal” level for dental health (0.7 mg/L) could be harmful.
This decision could potentially lead to the end of water fluoridation in the U.S. and is a significant blow to the EPA, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and groups like the American Dental Association (ADA), who have long defended the practice.
This is a huge win and another step forward to Make America Healthy Again (MAHA).
- - - - - -
You’re being poisoned.
The American food supply has been tainted with over 1,000 toxic ingredients that are banned across Europe.
Instead of opting for toxins, check out Field of Greens in the link below, a product that literally promises better health:
https://brickhousenutrition.com/pages/vnn
Follow @Vigilant_News📱
X | Rumble | IG | YT
More Stories:
🌐 VigilantNews.com
The “conspiracy theorists” were right again.
Judge Edward Chen has ruled that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) MUST take action on water fluoridation.
He found that fluoride poses an “unreasonable risk” of reducing IQ in children, especially for pregnant women and young kids, at the current levels.
He dismissed the EPA’s argument that it’s unclear exactly how much fluoride is dangerous and instead pointed to scientific evidence showing that even the so-called “optimal” level for dental health (0.7 mg/L) could be harmful.
This decision could potentially lead to the end of water fluoridation in the U.S. and is a significant blow to the EPA, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and groups like the American Dental Association (ADA), who have long defended the practice.
This is a huge win and another step forward to Make America Healthy Again (MAHA).
- - - - - -
You’re being poisoned.
The American food supply has been tainted with over 1,000 toxic ingredients that are banned across Europe.
Instead of opting for toxins, check out Field of Greens in the link below, a product that literally promises better health:
https://brickhousenutrition.com/pages/vnn
Follow @Vigilant_News
X | Rumble | IG | YT
More Stories:
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥5👍2
Forwarded from /CIG/ Telegram | Counter Intelligence Global (ȚepeȘ)
The day the Middle East almost erupted into a full regional war this summer, Lloyd Austin was touring an Asian shipyard.
Just before the defense secretary visited Subic Bay, Philippines, the former site of a massive U.S. Navy base, Israel killed the political leader of Hamas, who was visiting Iran.
Austin’s July visit was meant to show his focus on Asia, the region America says is its top priority. Instead, he ended the trip distracted by the Middle East, spending hours containing the crisis on a flight back to Washington.
Since Oct. 7, when Hamas’ attack on Israel provoked all-out war in Gaza, the Pentagon has been on call. When the region has approached a wider war, the Defense Department surged forces there to calm it down. But after a year, some in Congress and the Pentagon are growing concerned about how to sustain that pace, and what it will cost the military in the long term.
Call it the U.S. Central Command squeeze. The Pentagon insists its surge has helped stop the Middle East from falling into chaos. But the longer the region borders on conflict, the more the U.S. tests its endurance for crises later on, most notably, a future conflict with China.
The pressure on the military increased even further this week. After their most intense attacks in almost 20 years, Israel and the Lebanese militia group Hezbollah are close to a larger war. On Monday, Austin yet again ordered more troops to the region, joining 40,000 other American personnel there, 6,000 more than normal. Another aircraft carrier may soon follow.
“We’re caught in this kind of never-ending quagmire of having to divert resources, and we’re burning [out] on the back end,” a senior congressional aide said.
Their message was that America’s military wouldn’t exhaust itself anytime soon, but that a year of unplanned deployments and spent missiles come with a cost. Even more, they said, the longer the crisis continues, the more the Pentagon will have to manage tradeoffs between the urgent needs of the Middle East and the rising challenges of the Indo-Pacific.
Pentagon leaders say they calculate the risk in pulling assets from one region to another, and that the choice to move forces away from Asia is a sign that they consider the region stable enough to do so.
“I have relayed messages that it is better to invest in deterrence where there is no overt conflict, rather than intervene in a conflict where there is one already,” the Philippines Secretary of National Defense Gilberto Teodoro said in an August interview. He wouldn’t specify who in the U.S. those messages have reached.
That said, the cost of this posture is also becoming clearer.
The first, and perhaps the most important, part of that tally is the military’s ability to meet future needs, known as “readiness” in defense jargon. By sending more forces to the Middle East, the Pentagon is accepting what amounts to a mortgage: higher costs on its forces to avoid an even bigger bill.
Without specifying the impact of these extensions so far, multiple defense officials and congressional aides said the U.S. is already having to manage “tradeoffs” between the needs of the Middle East today and other areas in the future.
This February, the Houthis shot a ballistic missile at the Navy destroyer Gravely in the Red Sea, one of many times the militia group targeted American ships in the waterway.
But this one came close. In fact, the ship used a short-range weapon — rather than the typical missile — to intercept the attack. The Houthis came within a nautical mile of success, according to Navy officials.
This is an example of the other two costs involved in the Pentagon’s response.
The Navy estimates that between Oct. 7 and mid-July, it fired $1.16 billion worth of munitions while on station in the Red Sea.
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Defense News
What will the surge of US forces to the Middle East cost the military?
The Pentagon says its surge in forces has helped avert a regional war. But officials warn that it could wear down the services.
"Comedian Dmitry Gavrilov, who mocked Russia and the Russian army, has been charged with discrediting the Russian Armed Forces
"The Nizhny Novgorod District Court received materials on the case of comedian Gavrilov, who mocked Russia in his stand-up routines in Tbilisi, from which he cowardly fled. The would-be joker claimed that "Fuck Russia" was written on his wall, and also mocked the image of a Russian officer. The stand-up comedian posted a video of his performance on his YouTube channel.
"A case has been opened for discrediting the Russian Armed Forces. The comedian continues to serve a 13-day arrest for inciting hatred or enmity. Excuses that he insulted Russia just for fun will no longer help - the comedian-relakant will have to answer seriously for his words."
https://news.1rj.ru/str/readovkanews/87049
"The Nizhny Novgorod District Court received materials on the case of comedian Gavrilov, who mocked Russia in his stand-up routines in Tbilisi, from which he cowardly fled. The would-be joker claimed that "Fuck Russia" was written on his wall, and also mocked the image of a Russian officer. The stand-up comedian posted a video of his performance on his YouTube channel.
"A case has been opened for discrediting the Russian Armed Forces. The comedian continues to serve a 13-day arrest for inciting hatred or enmity. Excuses that he insulted Russia just for fun will no longer help - the comedian-relakant will have to answer seriously for his words."
https://news.1rj.ru/str/readovkanews/87049
Telegram
Readovka
На комика Дмитрия Гаврилова, глумившегося над Россией и русской армией, завели дело о дискредитации ВС РФ
В Нижегородский районный суд поступили материалы по делу комика Гаврилова, который в своих стендапах в Тбилиси насмехался над Россией, из которой трусливо…
В Нижегородский районный суд поступили материалы по делу комика Гаврилова, который в своих стендапах в Тбилиси насмехался над Россией, из которой трусливо…
"You’ll find Star Trek has never been more vulgar, more profane, more debauched. It’s small-minded in everything from the cast to production values to the storytelling. It’s about lecturing to the untouchables about their privilege and holding victimhood as the highest virtue. All those tiny elements which we ignored or snickered at in previous shows became the substance of their successors, while those parts we loved about Star Trek—the parts that made it great—were left behind or turned into nostalgia-bait."
https://isaacyoung.substack.com/p/star-trek-the-ultimate-dissident
https://isaacyoung.substack.com/p/star-trek-the-ultimate-dissident
Trantor Publishing
Star Trek: The Ultimate Dissident Review
Greetings everyone!
👍1
"Don’t trust the government or Big Pharma, or Big Food, or Big Anything? Did your super fit cycling mate suddenly die after his second jab and you wondered if it could have been the ‘vaccine’? Are you questioning your local council as to how excluding you from the local forest is somehow saving the planet? Then you are trying to fulfill a psychological need by adopting conspiracy theories and if you don’t stop it you’ll not only kill your grandmother but you’ll be responsible for the planet burning up! No wonder these AI wonderkids are working so hard to stop your conspiratorial fantasies – you’re damn dangerous and you need to be stopped."
https://substack.com/home/post/p-149094127#:~:text=Don%E2%80%99t%20trust%20the,to%20be%20stopped.
https://substack.com/home/post/p-149094127#:~:text=Don%E2%80%99t%20trust%20the,to%20be%20stopped.
Escaping Mass Psychosis
Don't worry, AI will tell us the truth
In a recent interaction with an acquaintance, he disclosed the disturbing news that the neighbours had ‘gone down the rabbit hole’ of conspiracy theories.
👍2
Forwarded from Ron Watkins [CodeMonkeyZ]
Look closely at her shoes. They are platforms and give her an estimated extra inch or two of height.
Her wearing these shoes shows that she is self conscious about her height.
Such insecurities indicate that she is weak and an inexperienced leader.
Her wearing these shoes shows that she is self conscious about her height.
Such insecurities indicate that she is weak and an inexperienced leader.
🔥2
Forwarded from Today I Learned
TIL the alleged Goebbels quote "If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it." has been repeated in numerous books and articles and on thousands of web pages, yet there is no primary source for it.
https://ift.tt/v8xb2Nl
https://ift.tt/v8xb2Nl
Reddit
From the todayilearned community on Reddit: TIL the alleged Goebbels quote "If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it…
Explore this post and more from the todayilearned community
"A hacker has accessed the Wi-Fi network of at least 19 UK railway stations run by Network Rail to display the message below.
"People who logged-on to the network initially saw a page outlining Islamic terror attacks in this country. The message noscriptd "We Love You Europe" went on to outline the Muslim terror attack in Manchester and warned of the "Islamisation Of Europe" with the attacks a "small taste of what's to come".
"British Transport Police said they were treating it as a priority as a spokesman said “We received reports at around 5.03pm yesterday (25 September) of a cyber-attack displaying Islamophobic messaging on some Network Rail Wi-Fi services. We are working alongside Network Rail to investigate the incident at pace.”"
https://traditionalbritain.org/news/trainhack/#:~:text=A%20hacker%20has,incident%20at%20pace.%E2%80%9D
"People who logged-on to the network initially saw a page outlining Islamic terror attacks in this country. The message noscriptd "We Love You Europe" went on to outline the Muslim terror attack in Manchester and warned of the "Islamisation Of Europe" with the attacks a "small taste of what's to come".
"British Transport Police said they were treating it as a priority as a spokesman said “We received reports at around 5.03pm yesterday (25 September) of a cyber-attack displaying Islamophobic messaging on some Network Rail Wi-Fi services. We are working alongside Network Rail to investigate the incident at pace.”"
https://traditionalbritain.org/news/trainhack/#:~:text=A%20hacker%20has,incident%20at%20pace.%E2%80%9D
Traditional Britain Group
UK Train Stations' Wi-Fi Hacked With An Islam-Critical Message - Traditional Britain Group
A hacker has accessed the Wi-Fi network of at least 19 UK railway stations run by Network Rail to display the message below. People who logged-on to the network would initially see a page outlining Islamic terror attacks in this country. The message noscriptd…
🔥3👎1
NEW: Penn tried to buy Amy Wax’s silence by offering her a deal: it would water down the sanctions against her—and take a pay cut off the table—provided she kept quiet about the case and stopped accusing the university of censoring her.
As you might guess, Wax refused.🧵
It was Wax’s refusal to take the deal that prompted Penn to announce Tuesday that it was suspending her for a year at half pay and stripping her of an endowed chair.
The sanctions, which also include a permanent loss of summer pay, were immediately condemned by the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE), which framed them as a precedent-setting blow to academic freedom.
"After today, any university under pressure to censor a controversial faculty member need only follow Penn’s playbook," FIRE said. "Faculty nationwide may now pay a heavy price for Penn's willingness to undercut academic freedom for all to get at this one professor."
But behind closed doors, the school was prepared to let Wax pay a much lower price—provided she keep her mouth shut about the two-and-a-half-year-long case that made Penn a pariah among academic freedom advocates and compounded the fallout of anti-Israel protests on campus.
The quid pro quo was outlined in a draft settlement agreement presented to Wax in August and reviewed by the Washington Free Beacon.
That agreement—the product of months of negotiations between Penn and its embattled gadfly—would have let Wax keep her base salary during the course of her suspension and thrown in a one-time payment of $50,000, partially offsetting the loss in summer pay.
In return, Wax would agree "not to disparage the University" over the two-year-long process to which it subjected her.
She would also waive her right to sue Penn or disclose the evidence she had presented in internal hearings to clear her name, including testimony from former students who called into question the charges against her.
Wax refused to sign the non-disparagement clause, she told the Beacon. The result was a breakdown in settlement talks and the imposition of the harsher sanctions originally approved by former Penn president Liz Magill.
Magill, you may remember, signed off on the pay cuts for Wax one month before she defended the rights of professors and students to call for the annihilation of the Jewish state.
"It doesn’t surprise me one iota administrators tried to pay [Wax] out to keep her quiet," said Alex Morey, who leads FIRE’s campus advocacy programs. "In fact, that seems very much on brand for Penn these days."
The draft agreement underscores Penn’s anxieties about a case that became a major liability in the wake of the Oct. 7 attacks, when Magill and other officials said they couldn’t punish anti-Semitic speech because of Penn’s supposed adherence to the First Amendment.
The university took no action against a cartoonist who depicted "Zionists" drinking the blood of Gazans, for example, or against students and professors who celebrated the worst pogrom since the Shoah.
But Magill did agree to sanction Wax for saying, among other things, that diversity officials "couldn’t be scholars if their life depended on it."
The double standard attracted a raft of ridicule and became Exhibit A in Wax’s argument that she was the victim of selective prosecution.
It also created ammunition for a possible lawsuit—Wax had said she would sue the university if it sanctioned her—a threat that hung over the settlement talks and may have made Penn more willing to engage in them.
It is rare for universities to sanction tenured professors and all but unheard of to do so over political speech. Penn made an exception for Wax, the school said on Tuesday, because her "sweeping and derogatory generalizations about groups" amounted to "targeted disparagement."
Those generalizations included the claim that black law students "rarely" finish in the top of their class—a statement Penn said breached the confidentiality of student grades—and arguments about racial differences in IQ.
As you might guess, Wax refused.🧵
It was Wax’s refusal to take the deal that prompted Penn to announce Tuesday that it was suspending her for a year at half pay and stripping her of an endowed chair.
The sanctions, which also include a permanent loss of summer pay, were immediately condemned by the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE), which framed them as a precedent-setting blow to academic freedom.
"After today, any university under pressure to censor a controversial faculty member need only follow Penn’s playbook," FIRE said. "Faculty nationwide may now pay a heavy price for Penn's willingness to undercut academic freedom for all to get at this one professor."
But behind closed doors, the school was prepared to let Wax pay a much lower price—provided she keep her mouth shut about the two-and-a-half-year-long case that made Penn a pariah among academic freedom advocates and compounded the fallout of anti-Israel protests on campus.
The quid pro quo was outlined in a draft settlement agreement presented to Wax in August and reviewed by the Washington Free Beacon.
That agreement—the product of months of negotiations between Penn and its embattled gadfly—would have let Wax keep her base salary during the course of her suspension and thrown in a one-time payment of $50,000, partially offsetting the loss in summer pay.
In return, Wax would agree "not to disparage the University" over the two-year-long process to which it subjected her.
She would also waive her right to sue Penn or disclose the evidence she had presented in internal hearings to clear her name, including testimony from former students who called into question the charges against her.
Wax refused to sign the non-disparagement clause, she told the Beacon. The result was a breakdown in settlement talks and the imposition of the harsher sanctions originally approved by former Penn president Liz Magill.
Magill, you may remember, signed off on the pay cuts for Wax one month before she defended the rights of professors and students to call for the annihilation of the Jewish state.
"It doesn’t surprise me one iota administrators tried to pay [Wax] out to keep her quiet," said Alex Morey, who leads FIRE’s campus advocacy programs. "In fact, that seems very much on brand for Penn these days."
The draft agreement underscores Penn’s anxieties about a case that became a major liability in the wake of the Oct. 7 attacks, when Magill and other officials said they couldn’t punish anti-Semitic speech because of Penn’s supposed adherence to the First Amendment.
The university took no action against a cartoonist who depicted "Zionists" drinking the blood of Gazans, for example, or against students and professors who celebrated the worst pogrom since the Shoah.
But Magill did agree to sanction Wax for saying, among other things, that diversity officials "couldn’t be scholars if their life depended on it."
The double standard attracted a raft of ridicule and became Exhibit A in Wax’s argument that she was the victim of selective prosecution.
It also created ammunition for a possible lawsuit—Wax had said she would sue the university if it sanctioned her—a threat that hung over the settlement talks and may have made Penn more willing to engage in them.
It is rare for universities to sanction tenured professors and all but unheard of to do so over political speech. Penn made an exception for Wax, the school said on Tuesday, because her "sweeping and derogatory generalizations about groups" amounted to "targeted disparagement."
Those generalizations included the claim that black law students "rarely" finish in the top of their class—a statement Penn said breached the confidentiality of student grades—and arguments about racial differences in IQ.
Other offenses were more banal, such as Wax commenting that "family breakdown" had harmed African Americans.
In a 2023 memo recommending sanctions against Wax—which became the basis for the pay cuts announced Tuesday—a university panel described that comment as an example of "inequitably targeted disrespect."
The further the case progressed, the more controversial it became. Leaks about the proceedings, which often violated norms of due process, alarmed academic freedom watchdogs and drew fire from both sides of the political spectrum.
Wax herself lambasted the process in interviews and podcasts—one of which was noscriptd the "DEI Witch Hunt at Penn Law"—keeping the case in the news as the university did damage control over the disastrous congressional testimony that cost Magill her job.
The settlement agreement would have put the kibosh on further controversy. That is why, Wax told the Free Beacon, she repeatedly refused to sign it.
"This case is about free expression," Wax said. "Penn wanted absolute silence. The big question is: Why do they want to hide what they’re doing?"
Read the full story here: https://freebeacon.com/campus/how-penn-tried-to-buy-amy-waxs-silence/
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1839306672004804878.html
In a 2023 memo recommending sanctions against Wax—which became the basis for the pay cuts announced Tuesday—a university panel described that comment as an example of "inequitably targeted disrespect."
The further the case progressed, the more controversial it became. Leaks about the proceedings, which often violated norms of due process, alarmed academic freedom watchdogs and drew fire from both sides of the political spectrum.
Wax herself lambasted the process in interviews and podcasts—one of which was noscriptd the "DEI Witch Hunt at Penn Law"—keeping the case in the news as the university did damage control over the disastrous congressional testimony that cost Magill her job.
The settlement agreement would have put the kibosh on further controversy. That is why, Wax told the Free Beacon, she repeatedly refused to sign it.
"This case is about free expression," Wax said. "Penn wanted absolute silence. The big question is: Why do they want to hide what they’re doing?"
Read the full story here: https://freebeacon.com/campus/how-penn-tried-to-buy-amy-waxs-silence/
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1839306672004804878.html
The Washington Free Beacon
How Penn Tried To Buy Amy Wax’s Silence
The University of Pennsylvania tried to cut a deal with Amy Wax, the tenured law professor who endured years of disciplinary proceedings over her controversial remarks. The school offered to water down the sanctions against her if she agreed to stop discussing—and…
❤1
"On Monday, UChicago’s president defended my right to say low IQ is why black people are murdering and mugging my classmates.
"Today, UChicago announced that someone has anonymously donated $100 million to support free speech.
Wow!" Daniel Schmidt
https://twitter.com/realdschmidt/status/1839339930734260247
"Today, UChicago announced that someone has anonymously donated $100 million to support free speech.
Wow!" Daniel Schmidt
https://twitter.com/realdschmidt/status/1839339930734260247
🤔4
Forwarded from Contarini
Note sent to students in 1968 by the wardens and fellows of Wadham college, Oxford.
🔥5