Forwarded from Geopolitics Prime
Deadly blast kills Russian chemical defense chief General Kirillov: what we know so far
The Russian Investigative Committee has opened a criminal case into the murder of Lieutenant General Igor Kirillov, head of the Troops of Radiological, Chemical, and Biological Defense of the Russian Armed Forces, and his assistant.
Here is what we know so far:
🔺 On the morning of December 17, an improvises explosive device (IED) detonated on Moscow’s Ryazansky Prospekt.
🔺 The IED was planted on an electric scooter positioned at the entrance of a residential building in southeast Moscow.
🔺 Approximately 200 grams of TNT were packed into the device, emergency services told Sputnik.
🔺 The blast resulted in the deaths of Igor Kirillov and his assistant.
🔺 Bomb squad forensic experts and investigators are working at the scene to determine all the circumstances of the crime.
🔺 Video footage from nearby surveillance cameras has been seized and is being reviewed by investigators, emergency services reported.
🔺 A criminal case has been opened, and a search for the perpetrator is underway, according to the Russian Investigative Committee.
🔺 General Kirillov had “systematically and fearlessly exposed the heinous crimes of the Anglo-Saxons and NATO provocations,” noted Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova.
🔺 Kirillov's murder will not go unpunished, said Konstantin Kosachev, deputy speaker of Russia's upper house of parliament. "This is a shock. An irreparable loss. Eternal memory. Condolences to the families of the victims. The murderers will be punished—without a doubt and without mercy," Kosachev wrote on Telegram.
👍 Boost us | Chat | Stickers |@geopolitics_live
The Russian Investigative Committee has opened a criminal case into the murder of Lieutenant General Igor Kirillov, head of the Troops of Radiological, Chemical, and Biological Defense of the Russian Armed Forces, and his assistant.
Here is what we know so far:
🔺 On the morning of December 17, an improvises explosive device (IED) detonated on Moscow’s Ryazansky Prospekt.
🔺 The IED was planted on an electric scooter positioned at the entrance of a residential building in southeast Moscow.
🔺 Approximately 200 grams of TNT were packed into the device, emergency services told Sputnik.
🔺 The blast resulted in the deaths of Igor Kirillov and his assistant.
🔺 Bomb squad forensic experts and investigators are working at the scene to determine all the circumstances of the crime.
🔺 Video footage from nearby surveillance cameras has been seized and is being reviewed by investigators, emergency services reported.
🔺 A criminal case has been opened, and a search for the perpetrator is underway, according to the Russian Investigative Committee.
🔺 General Kirillov had “systematically and fearlessly exposed the heinous crimes of the Anglo-Saxons and NATO provocations,” noted Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova.
🔺 Kirillov's murder will not go unpunished, said Konstantin Kosachev, deputy speaker of Russia's upper house of parliament. "This is a shock. An irreparable loss. Eternal memory. Condolences to the families of the victims. The murderers will be punished—without a doubt and without mercy," Kosachev wrote on Telegram.
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥1
Good advice from Health Ranger:
Yes, we are all being subjected to a government-run PSYOP with this drone scare event. The drones are clearly U.S. government drones, but they are lying to us and withholding key information we deserve to know!
I found a video from Youtuber Chase Hughes, an expert in human behavior modification and PSYOPS. He offers the following advice when analyzing how government and media conspire to push a PSYOP on the American public:
The Psychological Operation (PSYOPS) Framework
1. Analyze the Source: Determine if the outlet is credible or sensationalist. PSYOPS often rely on sensational headlines to capture attention.
2. Question the Timing: Ask if the story appears during a major crisis, scandal, or election. PSYOPS are often used to distract from bigger issues.
3. Follow the Narrative: Look for coordinated messaging across multiple outlets. Copy-pasted phrases like "unprecedented threat" or "undeniable evidence" are red flags.
4. Look for Emotional Triggers: PSYOPS thrive on fear, anger, and amazement. If a story feels designed to provoke an emotional reaction, it’s likely manipulative.
5. Check the Evidence: Real news provides verifiable data, while PSYOPS often rely on anonymous sources and vague claims.
6. Analyze Coverage Patterns: PSYOPS dominate the news cycle, drowning out other stories. Real news coexists with other reports.
7. Look for Follow-Ups: Real news evolves with updates, while PSYOPS fade away once they’ve served their purpose.
8. Trust Your Gut: If something feels off or noscripted, trust your instincts and back them up with research.
I would also add: DON'T TRUST MAINSTREAM MEDIA! Reuters and AP are part of the globalist control grid, and they lie on purpose. Of course so does the NYT, WashPost, CNN, etc.
Yes, we are all being subjected to a government-run PSYOP with this drone scare event. The drones are clearly U.S. government drones, but they are lying to us and withholding key information we deserve to know!
I found a video from Youtuber Chase Hughes, an expert in human behavior modification and PSYOPS. He offers the following advice when analyzing how government and media conspire to push a PSYOP on the American public:
The Psychological Operation (PSYOPS) Framework
1. Analyze the Source: Determine if the outlet is credible or sensationalist. PSYOPS often rely on sensational headlines to capture attention.
2. Question the Timing: Ask if the story appears during a major crisis, scandal, or election. PSYOPS are often used to distract from bigger issues.
3. Follow the Narrative: Look for coordinated messaging across multiple outlets. Copy-pasted phrases like "unprecedented threat" or "undeniable evidence" are red flags.
4. Look for Emotional Triggers: PSYOPS thrive on fear, anger, and amazement. If a story feels designed to provoke an emotional reaction, it’s likely manipulative.
5. Check the Evidence: Real news provides verifiable data, while PSYOPS often rely on anonymous sources and vague claims.
6. Analyze Coverage Patterns: PSYOPS dominate the news cycle, drowning out other stories. Real news coexists with other reports.
7. Look for Follow-Ups: Real news evolves with updates, while PSYOPS fade away once they’ve served their purpose.
8. Trust Your Gut: If something feels off or noscripted, trust your instincts and back them up with research.
I would also add: DON'T TRUST MAINSTREAM MEDIA! Reuters and AP are part of the globalist control grid, and they lie on purpose. Of course so does the NYT, WashPost, CNN, etc.
👍3
Forwarded from Disclose.tv
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
NEW - Pfizer officials, at a Senate hearing in Australia, say their employees were given an special batch of vaccine, not the one which was rolled out to the public.
@disclosetv
@disclosetv
🤔4🔥1
Forwarded from NinaByzantina
I thought, surely, this WILD photo of Zelensky 🇺🇦 going into full DICTATOR-GOD mode in the holy monastery of the Kiev-Pechersk Lavra was a FAKE, but NO. It’s on the President’s site.
https://www.president.gov.ua/en/news/vdyachnij-usim-kapelanam-yaki-razom-iz-zahisnikami-na-peredo-94857
🤦🏻♀️
@NinaByzantina
https://www.president.gov.ua/en/news/vdyachnij-usim-kapelanam-yaki-razom-iz-zahisnikami-na-peredo-94857
🤦🏻♀️
@NinaByzantina
👎5
𝕋𝕙𝕖 𝔸𝕖𝕥𝕙𝕖𝕣𝕤𝕥𝕣𝕖𝕒𝕞
Real-Time Radiation World Map https://www.gmcmap.com/
Typical background levels are 10-20 cpm (counts per minute). I typically get 9-12 cpm at my house.
Forwarded from UNITED24Media
The State Duma of the Russian Federation has proposed reintroducing food stamps, similar to those used in the USSR.
The proposal is driven by high inflation and the impact of rising prices on the poorest citizens.
The proposal is driven by high inflation and the impact of rising prices on the poorest citizens.
Origins of the Club of Rome...
The contents of the report on Peccei’s speech so closely coincided with King’s own concerns about the future that he wrote to Peccei suggesting that they meet the next time he was in Paris. The meeting took place and turned out to be not only a meeting of men, but of minds. Both men recognized that, in order to create the conditions for the survival of civilized life on Earth, politicians and world leaders must be provided with the ammunition for making courageous, difficult and even unpopular policy decisions. They would have to make commitments for the long-term future, far beyond their individual terms of office. Peccei and King agreed that, none of the formal intergovernmental international organizations such as the UN could do this – at least not in time. These bodies were far too cumbersome. It was characteristic of both men that they immediately got down to business. They discussed how they could assemble others who were similarly concerned about the world future in a group that was independent of race, politics, religions and bureaucracies.
https://whitehead-family.ca/drrennie/chap13.html
The contents of the report on Peccei’s speech so closely coincided with King’s own concerns about the future that he wrote to Peccei suggesting that they meet the next time he was in Paris. The meeting took place and turned out to be not only a meeting of men, but of minds. Both men recognized that, in order to create the conditions for the survival of civilized life on Earth, politicians and world leaders must be provided with the ammunition for making courageous, difficult and even unpopular policy decisions. They would have to make commitments for the long-term future, far beyond their individual terms of office. Peccei and King agreed that, none of the formal intergovernmental international organizations such as the UN could do this – at least not in time. These bodies were far too cumbersome. It was characteristic of both men that they immediately got down to business. They discussed how they could assemble others who were similarly concerned about the world future in a group that was independent of race, politics, religions and bureaucracies.
https://whitehead-family.ca/drrennie/chap13.html
whitehead-family.ca
13. The Club of Rome - Memoirs of a Boffin
🔥2
Forwarded from Today I Learned
TIL there is a belief amongst some Catholics known as 'Benevacantism'; the belief that Pope Benedict XVI's resignation was not valid, meaning that the current Pope Francis has been an 'antipope', or illegitimate pretender to the papacy, this entire time
https://ift.tt/rTkC3zg
https://ift.tt/rTkC3zg
Reddit
From the todayilearned community on Reddit: TIL there is a belief amongst some Catholics known as 'Benevacantism'; the belief that…
Explore this post and more from the todayilearned community
👍2🔥1
"For maximal effect in asymmetric warfare Vox Day instructs that the ideal target should have these three characteristics:
It can be reached with certainty
It’s attacked from a place that cannot be reached by the enemy
Its symbolic value
The historic Oreshnik attack on the old Soviet missile factory had all three of these qualities, attended by a spectacular nightime display. The enemies of Russia are clearly disoriented by it. One tell is the uninformed downplaying of its significance, another the lack of reliable ground photographs and damage assessments."
https://forrestbishop.substack.com/p/back-engineering-oreshnik-second#:~:text=For%20maximal%20effect,and%20damage%20assessments.
It can be reached with certainty
It’s attacked from a place that cannot be reached by the enemy
Its symbolic value
The historic Oreshnik attack on the old Soviet missile factory had all three of these qualities, attended by a spectacular nightime display. The enemies of Russia are clearly disoriented by it. One tell is the uninformed downplaying of its significance, another the lack of reliable ground photographs and damage assessments."
https://forrestbishop.substack.com/p/back-engineering-oreshnik-second#:~:text=For%20maximal%20effect,and%20damage%20assessments.
Substack
Back Engineering Oreshnik, Second Pass
This is the second part of what will become a series on the Oreshnik weapon. If you know of any other analysis out there that is superior to this one, please link it in the comments.
👍3🤔1
What happened to the Apollo 11 tapes?
"From there, the tapes were sent to the Washington National Records Center (WRNC) in Suitland, Md. The engineers never saw the back-up telemetry tapes again."
https://archive.org/details/apollo-11-telemetry-data-report/mode/2up
"From there, the tapes were sent to the Washington National Records Center (WRNC) in Suitland, Md. The engineers never saw the back-up telemetry tapes again."
https://archive.org/details/apollo-11-telemetry-data-report/mode/2up
Internet Archive
The Apollo 11 Telemetry Data Recordings: A Final Report : NASA, John Sarkissian, Colin Mackellar, Stan Lebar, Bill Wood, Richard…
An account of the search for the original one-inch telemetry tapes which recorded footage from the surface of the moon during Apollo 11, and of the restoration...
🤔4🔥1
Forwarded from Breaking911
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
BREAKING: Donald Trump has officially secured enough electoral votes to officially win the presidency
👍5
"Aristotelian physics holds that all bodies move according to their nature and their natural place. Stones fall to the earth; fire rises to the sky. Thus, Aristotle’s adherents assumed heavy bodies fell faster than lighter bodies. This was disputed as early as the sixth century by the Byzantine Church Father, John Philoponus (~490–~570), who noted, we presume from experiment, “that two unequal weights dropped from a given height strike the ground at almost the same time” [[ii], [iii]].
"If that sounds familiar, you may be thinking of the famous demonstration Galileo (1564–1642) conducted at the Leaning Tower of Pisa. There are some subtleties omitted from the usual popular account of the event, however. In particular, the experiment was done by Simon Stevin (1548–1620) and Jan Cornets de Groot (1554–1640), not by Galileo, and they conducted the experiment from the Niewe Kerk [New Church] in Delft, the Netherlands, not from the Leaning Tower of Pisa [[iv]]."
https://aetherczar.substack.com/p/524-the-equivalence-principle
"If that sounds familiar, you may be thinking of the famous demonstration Galileo (1564–1642) conducted at the Leaning Tower of Pisa. There are some subtleties omitted from the usual popular account of the event, however. In particular, the experiment was done by Simon Stevin (1548–1620) and Jan Cornets de Groot (1554–1640), not by Galileo, and they conducted the experiment from the Niewe Kerk [New Church] in Delft, the Netherlands, not from the Leaning Tower of Pisa [[iv]]."
https://aetherczar.substack.com/p/524-the-equivalence-principle
Substack
5.2.4 The Equivalence Principle
Everything Falls Together
❤3🔥1