Early colonisation of North America, 1607-1689
https://redd.it/1jfmkya
@r_mapporn

The Mainstream Press is Lying to You BIG TIME About the Texas Child Who “Died From Measles”

The child died from medical malpractice, not the measles.

https://www.vigilantfox.com/p/press-lying-measles-death

Follow @VigilantFox 🦊
More Stories: VigilantFox.com

TBH I can understand this.

A high-rise building under construction in Bangkok collapsed after a 7.7 magnitude earthquake rocked Thailand and neighboring Myanmar midday on Friday.
😱😱😱

https://news.1rj.ru/str/LauraAbolichannel

A federal judge has ordered two male prisoners to be sent back to women's prisons and for their taxpayer-funded hormonal therapy to be resumed, in the latest attempt to stifle Trump's executive orders.

https://t.co/vwPgGXvgjX

Truth.

📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD

Interesting result. Iran is turning into quite a scientific powerhouse.

Let’s make this as clear as possible:

Iran is a signatory to the NPT.

It has been since 1970.

Iran is not allowed to have nuclear weapons.

Iran has said it is not seeking nuclear weapons.

Iran’s Supreme Leader has issued a religious edict prohibiting Iran from having nuclear weapons.

So everyone should be in agreement:

Iran is committed to adhering to a treaty obligation which prohibits it from having nuclear weapons.

There is no clause that provides an exception to this obligation because Israel has nuclear weapons.

Not even Iran makes that argument.

Last year a succession of Iranian leaders made statements which, when viewed in totality, call into question Iran’s intent when it comes to nuclear weapons.

In February 2024 Ali Akbar Salehi, a former leader of Tehran's nuclear program, said that Iran possesses all the necessary components for a nuclear weapon.

In April 2024 Ahmad Haghtalab, an Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) commander who serves as the head of security for Iran’s nuclear sites declared “It is possible and conceivable to revise the Islamic Republic of Iran’s nuclear doctrine and policies to deviate from previously declared considerations.”

And in October 2024 nearly 40 members of parliament sent a letter to Iran’s Supreme National Security Council, its top security policymaking body, requesting that the council revise the defense doctrine of the Islamic Republic of Iran to permit development of nuclear weapons.

Statements such as these have prompted President Trump to make the denuclearization of Iran a top priority.

Trump recently sent a letter to Iran’s Supreme leader in which a stark choice was offered: negotiate or go to war.

Iran has indicated any attack against its nuclear facilities would likely cause them to change their nuclear doctrine.

It is believed Iran could rapidly move to build a believable nuclear weapon within a few weeks once the decision was made.

It is believed Iran’s critical nuclear infrastructure is buried deep underground.

So deep no conventional munitions could destroy them.

If Trump were to attack Iran’s nuclear infrastructure with conventional munitions that failed to achieve their objective of destruction, an Iranian nuclear weapon would be all but assured.

This is why Trump ordered the US nuclear posture and employment plans to be altered so that low-yield nuclear weapons possessing the ability to destroy underground facilities such as those housing Iran’s nuclear program would be developed and deployed.

Today the US has two nuclear weapons specifically fielded for this purpose: the B61-12 gravity bomb and the W-76-2 low yield nuclear warhead for use on the Trident submarine launched missile.

Both weapons are operational and deployed where they could readily be used against Iran.

If Trump were to attack Iran’s nuclear infrastructure with the goal of guaranteeing its destruction, he would have to use nuclear weapons preemptively.

This fits in with both the nuclear posture and implementation plan Trump signed off on which Iran specifically in mind.

There are those who say that by making this assessment, I am advocating for a nuclear strike on Iran by the US.

This simply isn’t true.

I’m providing an assessment, not soliciting in favor of war.

A war with Iran would be a disaster.

A nuclear attack on Iran by the US would be catastrophic.

I am firmly against both.

But that won’t stop me from providing the most accurate analysis of what I believe is actually happening today regarding Iran, whether I support such policies or not.

Q&A | The Russia House with Scott Ritter | Substack

Piezoelectricity nucleates gold precipitation: https://www.sciencealert.com/radical-theory-suggests-earthquakes-spark-gold-nuggets-into-existence

@BobMoran, on this day in 2018

📱 ROBINMG

Understand brainwashing and how it works: The Science of Brainwashing - David Charalambous.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yrh42yLxS84

"I hoped that the current vibe shift and the new American administration already calling out the UK and Europe for crushing free speech and overregulating everything would dampen the Online Harms Bill. Ofcom would be reeled in purely for optics and geopolitical reasons. Alas, that does not seem to be where we are heading."
https://morgoth.substack.com/p/the-british-governments-censorship#:~:text=I%20hoped%20that,we%20are%20heading.

‼️Trump Administration Shuts Down USAID, Fires Remaining Staff

After multiple court battles, the Trump Administration has officially moved to dissolve USAID, issuing a final memo informing remaining staff they are FIRED as part of a merger with the State Department.

"The legacy media never mentions white genocide in South Africa, because it doesn't fit their narrative that whites can be victims."

— Elon Musk, 24 March 2025