Trump To Hang A ‘Presidential Portrait’ Of Biden’s Autopen In The White House

https://modernity.news/2025/09/02/trump-to-hang-a-presidential-portrait-of-bidens-autopen-in-the-white-house/

Chinese Ambassador Sun Lei excoriated the United States for not supporting abortion-on-demand in recent remarks to the United Nations.

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/chinese-ambassador-attacks-us-over-pro-life-policies-whitewashes-chinas-abuses/?utm_source=telegram

That's what the German High Command wants the French to think... https://redd.it/1llw0oo

Before and after.

Geomagnetic storms Now and future forecast.

#weather #storm #magneticstorm #geomagneticstorm #sun #sunactivity

Nora Vincent all over again. Every single time.

#BREAKING | Gold soars past $3,600 for the first time ever, hitting a new all-time high.

The Global Eye | Subscribe

🧐The Myth of the First "Virus" 🦠

Adolf Mayer's famous tobacco mosaic experiment from 1886 is hailed as a milestone in virology. But a look at his original paper reveals the method to be anything but natural.
Source: Mayer, A. (1886). Concerning the mosaic disease of tobacco. Phytopathological Classics No. 7. American Phytopathological Society, St. Paul, MN.

💉 Not an "infection," but an injection!
Mayer did not transmit the sap of symptomatic leaves naturally but forcibly injected it directly into the veins of healthy plants using glass needles.

"For instance, if one grinds up finely a leaf that is clearly diseased with the addition of a few drops of water and sucks the thick green emulsion thus obtained into fine capillary glass tubes and then sticks these into the thick leaf veins of an older plant..."

🍃 In the field: NOTHING happened!
Mayer himself admits in his study that a natural transmission from plant to plant never occurred. His own words:

"It may be accepted for certain, that an obviously diseased plant is never a source of infection for its surroundings." [...] "Under natural conditions no significant infection takes place from plant to plant."

🔎 Contradictions & Failures:

🔸 The filter test: His experiment showed that the assumed pathogen could NOT pass through any filtration process — logically excluding a "virus".

"Result: Filtrates that are clarified (purified) in any way do not have the capacity for infection."

🔸 No cultivation: Mayer never succeeded in isolating or culturing the supposed pathogen. He only saw unstructured particles.

"Whatever other smaller particles one may see in the sap they are so indefinite, even when strongly magnified, that one may not with certainty designate them as anything organized."

🔸 Conclusion despite counter-evidence
Mayer even managed to culture bacteria from the sap of symptomatic plants. But when he injected these very bacteria into healthy plants, none developed symptoms. Despite this direct counter-evidence, he maintained the hypothesis of a "bacterial disease" and openly admitted that his conclusion was not based on his experimental facts.

"Later I tried to isolate these questionable organisms according to Koch’s method […] in many cases I proved the presence of bacteriological vegetation. However, none of these, used as inoculum, were infectious to healthy tobacco. Likewise I inoculated […] with a great number of well-known bacteria […] without resultant disease in a single case."

💡 The logical alternative that is kept silent
Other researchers such as A.F. Woods, F.W.T. Hunger, or Doerr had a plausible explanation that did not require a hypothetical pathogen: The symptoms are endogenous — a product of the plant itself! They saw the cause in a metabolic disorder leading to an overproduction of the plant’s own "enzymes" or toxins.
Source: Prof. Lüdtke, K. (1999). On the history of early virus research. Max Planck Institute for the History of Science.

📌 Conclusion:
Mayer neither demonstrated a "virus" nor a natural transmission. He injured the plants and injected sap from symptomatic leaves into their vascular system. That reactions occurred is obvious — not because of a pathogen, but as a result of injecting decomposed tissue with toxic breakdown products.

⚠️ Every organism reacts to stressful substances. Injecting breakdown products of symptomatic processes causes poisoning faster; with saline solution, a much higher dose is needed to elicit a reaction. Without injection, nothing happens. Moreover, his experiments were unblinded and thus prone to bias and confirmation errors.

✅ To this day, natural symptom transmission has never been demonstrated in controlled experiments.

Ready to turn your view of "disease" and health upside down? Get the NEXIQA app.
👉 https://nexiqa.com/

The most cursed map to exist...
https://redd.it/1mzlhlv
@r_mapporn

Professor Rachel Fulton Brown’s lecture at BasedCon 5.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-15070395/dead-man-woke-harvest-organs.html The dead man who woke up just as surgeons were about to harvest his organs... and why scientists believe 'dead' patients can come back to life: CHISTOPHER STEVENS reveals the proof life doesn't end when we stop breathing... Concerns have also been expressed about the influence of big money in the process with a human bodies being said to be worth at least £1.5 - £3.5Million for the organs & tissues removed and whether the 'diagnosis' of someone being brain dead/actually dead is reliable - ie that the parameters are reliable that someone is genuinely not still alive/aware when organs are removed. New NHS protocols of applying high doses of Adrenalin maintain organs but impair the brain seemingly potentially creating legitimate organ harvesting circumstances. It is reported that no anaesthetic is given; only drugs to maintain the body and one other – a paralysing drug called a non-depolarising blocking agent. Yes – a drug to paralyse you while they take the organs with no anaesthetic." "What may also be disturbing is that it is reported that 'Lacrimation' or crying is common among donors as their organs are removed:" https://www.ukcolumn.org/article/no-time-to-die Since 2020, every UK citizen has been automatically classed as an organ donor, UNLESS YOU ACTIVELY OPT OUT- most people don't know this, so it is arguably perhaps NOT informed consent. - One example is the Organ Donor code 115 that may be displayed on your Driving Licence (bottom left corner on reverse side) - you can write to DVLA to have this removed.

In 2021, the UK announced its ambition to become the “organ retrieval epicentre” of the world.

How and where to register your decision NOT to donate organs/tissues:
https://blog.mymedicalchoice.org/2025/06/12/uk-organ-donation-complete-guide-to-opt-out-system-and-3rd-party-status-updates/