I'm gonna need some time to do my due diligence. Like 55 years.
@OwenBenjaminComedy

How “great men” have a committee meeting: zaitcev.livejournal.com/253847.html

“I enjoyed the 2016 all-female film… I was truly rooting for Ghostbusters: Afterlife.”

arstechnica.com/gaming/2021/11/review-ghostbusters-afterlife-sinks-under-treacly-over-the-top-fan-service/

Here's Alex Berenson reporting on all-cause mortality data from England, showing all-cause mortality from the vaccinated is higher than those who are unvaccinated. This is about the fourth analysis that shows this phenomenon.

https://alexberenson.substack.com/p/vaccinated-english-adults-under-60?

Prosecutors Find Mail-In Jury Votes At 3AM, Rittenhouse Now Guilty

READ: https://j.mp/3x4nvNw

@TheBabylonBee | Download Our App

I have also been thinking about why I don’t blog as much as I used to, as compared with interacting on Telegram and other social media. Telegram is a mosaic, where connections and spells happen through juxtapositions and symbols. In this respect, it is far more “medieval” than the linearity of a blogpost, which is still a kind of monologue, albeit potentially more dynamic than a book (aka monograph). Telegram is aptly named—the successor of the telegraph, the original light writing.

Rittenhouse, former lawyers in dispute over who gets $2M bond money. His mom raised $500K, gave it to the lawyer, he added it to other pools of donations for Kyle, and he posted that as the $2 million bond. He now claims all the money should go back to him. Lim Wood wants it all back for his fund, which he says contributed to it, and it looks like none will go to Kyle or his current attorney without a fight. But according to Kyle’s attorney, there will be a fight. https://nypost.com/2021/11/20/rittenhouse-former-lawyers-in-dispute-over-who-gets-2m-bond-money/

I texted one of the Black Rifle owners to see if they’re ready to admit they were wrong. He responded by bragging about their upcoming IPO. Make your coffee purchasing decisions accordingly.

When you've gone further than the actual Nazis, maybe it's time to reconsider your policies?

"Forced vaccination against the will of kids and parents alike, which had caused outrage throughout the Weimar years, stopped happening from the 1930s on. By 1936, Germans no longer had to prove they’d gotten a smallpox vaccine to attend secondary school, and, by 1940, the policy of “elasticity” was made legally binding, and continued to be used by German governments even after the war. The Nazis instead relied on mass propaganda and the education system to convince people to choose to get vaccinated."

https://www.jacobinmag.com/2021/09/vaccine-mandates-covid-pandemic-german-nazi-inoculation-policy

“In his book, To Build a Castle, Vladimir Bukovsky provides one of the finest denoscriptions of institution-jamming ever recorded. He organized it.”

From inside a gulag. It worked.

www.garynorth.com/public/22358.cfm

Oct 1, 2021: "AI-powered DoD data analysis program named “Project Salus” SHATTERS official vaccine narrative, shows A.D.E. accelerating in the fully vaccinated with each passing week"

Excerpt:

"An AI-powered Dept. of Defense program named “Project Salus,” run in cooperation with the JAIC (Joint Artificial Intelligence Center), has analyzed data on 5.6 million Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 or older. Data were aggregated from Humetrix, a real-time data and analytics platform that tracks health care outcomes. Legal analysis from Thomas Renz of Renz-Law.com is included in a breaking video interview, below.

The alarming findings show that the vast majority of covid hospitalizations are occurring among fully-vaccinated individuals and that outcomes among the fully vaccinated are growing worse with each passing week. This appears to fit the pattern of so-called Antibody Dependent Enhancement, where the treatment intervention (mRNA vaccines) is worsening health outcomes and leading to excess hospitalizations and deaths.

These data, presented here, shatter the official Biden / Fauci narrative that falsely claims America is experiencing, “a pandemic of the unvaccinated.” The data show that the pandemic actually appears to be accelerated by covid-19 vaccines, while unvaccinated individuals are having far better outcomes than the vaccinated.

Furthermore, according to these data (shown below), the single best strategy for avoid post-vaccine infections and hospitalizations is natural immunity derived from a previous covid infection."

https://www.cracknewz.com/2021/10/breaking-ai-powered-dod-data-analysis.html?m=1

The Original Antigenic Sin: How the vaccines might be making COVID-19 worse - LifeSite

"My thesis is that the double-vaccinated and triple-vaccinated (likely quadruple vaccinated in Israel) are driving the transmission of the Delta variant and that this has severe consequences for the vulnerable unvaccinated and the vaccinated, too. They are potentially functioning as asymptomatic super spreaders. I suggest that these COVID vaccines are keeping the vaccinated person alive but allowing for infection and transmission which could permit very virulent strains to circulate within a population. What we are seeing at present cannot really be explained by differences in variants and this breakdown [breakthrough] in infections among vaccinated persons. People who are double vaccinated are being made to shed virus at alarmingly high levels.

The Marek’s disease (Read et al.) in chickens model (in which ‘leaky’ non-sterilizing, non-neutralizing imperfect vaccines reduce symptoms but do not stop infection or transmission) and the concept of the Original antigenic sin (in which the initial priming or exposure of the immune system prejudices the immune response life-long to that pathogen/virus or similar ones, and if the initial priming of the immune system is indeed sub-optimal, then the subsequent response [exposure] may be sub-optimal to that pathogen or similar/related ones) may explain what we are potentially facing now with these imperfect COVID vaccines: immune escape, increased viral load, increased transmission, faster transmission, and potentially “hotter” variants."

https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/the-original-antigenic-sin-how-the-vaccines-might-be-making-covid-19-worse/?utm_source=telegram

New study from Germany confirms higher vax coverage --> higher excess mortality

https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/new-study-from-germany-confirms-higher?r=o7iqo

The Harvard study showed vaccination makes things worse as far as cases goes. This new study from German shows that the more you vaccinate the more people get killed. Not a surprise to me

What this new German study shows is:  The higher the vaccination rate, the higher the excess mortality.

I can’t say I’m surprised. These are the deadliest vaccine in human history by a factor of over 800. But it is always nice to get confirmation from multiple sources who have no conflicts.

The authors write (translated into English): “The correlation is + .31, is amazingly high and especially in an unexpected direction. Actually, it should be negative, so that one could say: The higher the vaccination rate, the lower the excess mortality. However, the opposite is the case and this urgently needs to be clarified. Excess mortality can be observed in all 16 countries…”

In plain English: vaccination makes things worse, not better.
I wanted to share this study with you because it might be interesting for you and maybe you want to add it to your vaccine data.

Here is the link to the original study (it will download a word docx in German).
https://www.utebergner.de/cms/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/%C3%9Cbersterblichkeit-KW-36-bis-40-in-2021-003.docx

The original German study translated into English is available as a PDF here.
https://www.skirsch.com/covid/GermanAnalysis.pdf

And here is a news report about this study:

Bundesländer mit hoher Impfquote haben höchste Übersterblichkeit - reitschuster.de
https://reitschuster.de/post/bundeslaender-mit-hoher-impfquote-haben-hoechste-uebersterblichkeit/

People Died at Rates 20% Higher Than What's Normal After Getting Second COVID-19 Shot, Swedish Study Shows

🇸🇪💉@COVID19Up: People appear to die at rates 20% or more above normal for weeks after receiving their second COVID-19 vaccine dose, according to data from a huge Swedish study.

The figures are buried in a preprint paper on vaccine effectiveness released last month. The headline finding of the paper was that protection against COVID-19, including severe cases, plunged toward negative efficacy after six months.

But on page 32 of the 34-page report, a chart shows that 3,939 of 4.03 million Swedes who received the second dose died less than two weeks later. Normally, Sweden has about 3,300 deaths every two weeks—not just in the people who received vaccines, but in all 10.6 million of its people.

This is a major red flag about COVID-19 vaccines and death.

Join our 31K strong news channel:
@COVID19Up

Join our 10K member group chat:
@COVID1984Chat

The Lancet, the journal as many will remember is now infamous for Peter Daszak's secretly orchestrated landmark statement which attacked "conspiracies suggesting that COVID-19 does not have a natural origin", and which has since agreed to publish alternative theories suggesting a lab origin in a messy U-turn, has recently published more letters capitulating on key premises of the official narrative:

Vaccine-driven virus evolution:
"Given that the antibody response to the spike protein is so focused, could mutations in these restricted sequences lead to a less efficacious vaccine, if the human immune response is specific to the vaccine sequence? These mutations might be driven by antigenic drift, or by selection, either during natural infection or due to the vaccine itself. When a virus is grown under the selective pressure of a single monoclonal antibody that targets a single epitope on a viral protein, mutations in that protein sequence will lead to the loss of neutralisation, and the generation of escape mutants." "In principle, these findings suggest that variants of SARS-CoV-2 could evolve with resistance to immunity induced by recombinant spike protein vaccines (which are based on the original sequence, Wuhan-Hu-1) in some people ..."
—SARS-CoV-2 Evolution and Vaccines: Cause for Concern? | The Lancet (2021)

This letter acknowledges the possibility of vaccination impacting the evolution of the virus, although seemingly as indirectly as possible despite the prescient nature of the topic and many molecular epidemiology publications suggesting this is the case.

This is not a "Pandemic of the unvaccinated", and that stigmatising the unvaccinated is "dangerous and wrong":
"In the USA and Germany, high-level officials have used the term pandemic of the unvaccinated, suggesting that people who have been vaccinated are not relevant in the epidemiology of COVID-19." "There is increasing evidence that vaccinated individuals continue to have a relevant role in transmission." "People who are vaccinated have a lower risk of severe disease but are still a relevant part of the pandemic. It is therefore wrong and dangerous to speak of a pandemic of the unvaccinated."
—COVID-19: Stigmatising the Unvaccinated is not Justified | The Lancet (2021)

This flies in the face of what many officials are saying and the premise on which many recent policies are being based.

These developments are also on the back of the World Health Organization stating that giving boosters to health adults and vaccinating healthy children is wrong (although their rationale for this is some talking point about global vaccine equity, rather than the catastrophic effects mass vaccination will continue to have on the development of the pandemic, the evolution of the virus, and individuals experiencing life-changing adverse reactions). Nevertheless they are making the same prenoscriptive claims as antivaxxers: stop boosters, stop vaccinating children, stop persecuting the unvaccinated.

Perhaps cynically, this appears to be official bodies trying to save face and escape liability as a true understanding of the situation continues to emerge. The damage has been done, what has been set in motion cannot easily be reversed, and what they are capitulating on now could have been said a long time ago.

Countries that launched mass vaccination campaigns earlier in the year are all seeing extraordinary increases in all-cause mortality.

Why is that? What are they doing differently in 2021 than they did in the years before?

https://dailyexpose.uk/2021/11/21/depopulation-agenda-most-vaccinated-countries-are-all-suffering-an-extraordinary-rise-in-excess-deaths/