Draw nigh to God: and he will draw nigh to you. Cleanse your hands, ye sinners, and purify your hearts, ye double minded.
—James 4:8
—James 4:8
All of humanity's problems stem from man's inability to sit quietly in a room alone.
—Blaise Pascal
—Blaise Pascal
‡ S, falling in love cannot occur twice; it means there is no chance you can fall in love twice, for if love is the hemorrhage and a manifest catastrophe, then nothing is left in the lover to fuel another love and fall in love once again. Love empties all possibilities of recovery. Falling in love is a one way ticket to the end of health. Barthes suggests that love is cyclic, that for each love there is a phase of recovery and at the end of each recovery another love is waiting. This cycle strikes me not as love but flirtation, flirtation with survival. A lover who constantly falls in love (the Barthesian lover) flirts either with the survival of himself or his emotions. Love in this sense, only reinscribes survival. And when it comes to survival, human desire is already a dead ruin. In Barthes' account, it is not love that matters but the 'next love' which presupposed the survival of the lover and the regeneration of his health. But love's sole enthusiam lies in consuming every possibility of falling in love again. Cyclic love is like Chinese Erotics, in which sexual excitement is held back in order to have multiple climaxes. I love to recover to love someone else to recover to love someones else... This is indeed an inventive formula, but one for survival, not for love. The Love-Recovery cycle that Barthes maps in his works is of course Proustian but deeply resembles the ever refining self-fertilizing cycle of Aristotle (nothing must be wasted as it is needed in the next phase of the cycle, the next love, the next recovery from the last love). If for Avernus there is only one irreversible descent, then descending again is merely an attempt to keep ascending an escaping Avernus. Love ensures the failure of escape. Love is only thinkable as one and only one tyrannical possibility: falling in love once and for all. Viva the chain. Ok S, im tired ... signing off
Cyclonopedia: Complicity with Anonymous Materials - 2008 - Reza Negarestani
Cyclonopedia: Complicity with Anonymous Materials - 2008 - Reza Negarestani
(EXHUMATIONS)
ARI·RAM
https://aidanmaclear.wordpress.com/2019/01/29/whores-and-actors/
"One should look upon the actor as a jester in motley, a silly, unserious man with bells tinkling on his hat, not as a demigod. That is his place, that is his nature, that is his inner worth as a man".