The combat of Deleuze and Félix is completely different. It is not a matter, for them, of refuting the real of Desire, but on the contrary of affirming its omnipresence and immanent productivity. The unconscious of neurotic repression only circum scribes a very small region, the region worked over by ‘lalangue’, by the ‘Symbolic’, the ‘phallus’, ‘incest’ and ‘castration’. Taking up Sade’s Republican injunction, Gilles and Félix utter an ‘Analysts, one more effort, if you will tackle the matters and intensities of Desire!’ – not only beyond the symptoms of mental illness but also in philosophy and art, and above all in the paradoxes and ‘catastrophes’ (Réné Thom) of politics and history.
Schizoanalysis is not an ‘anti-psychoanalysis’ but an active deterritorialization, a deconstruction and a decoding of the axiomatized, semiotized and structured fluxes of desire of an orthodox Unconscious, the servant of capital. A suranalysis, in some ways, Freud’s plague, here at last.
Analysis, Between Psycho and Schizo(tr:fr-en; A. Goffey)

"The future wants to steal your soul and vaporize it in nanotechnics.
One/zero, light/dark, Neuromancer/Wintermute.
Cybergothic vampirically contaminates and assetstrips the Marxian Critique of political economy, scrambling it with the following theses:

1) Anthropormorphic surplus-value is not analytically extricable from transhuman machineries.
2) Markets, desire and science fiction are all parts of the infrastructure.
3) Virtual Capital-Extinction is immanent to production.

The short-term is already hacked by the long-term.
The medium-term is reefed on schizophrenia.
The long-term is cancelled."
N. Land; CyberGothic

i have no fucking clue what BoomerLand and BoomerLandians are talking about, nonetheless

are the horrors beyond our comprehension or are we just dumb?

that's the feminism I support🔥🔥🔥

"But where there is no madness, there is, to be sure, also no real, active, living intellect. For wherein is intellect to prove itself but in the conquest, mastery, & ordering of madness?"

--F. W. J. von Schelling

if something that's so deeply ingrained to your singular way of doing/undoing identity can/should be explained with(in) two sentences -
i am not interested in knowing what it is.