[1] literally my-sister-in-SpinoNietzsche.

[2] it is quite true that it is only with Techno, and even most particularly, importantly, with Detroit Techno and the underlying affirmative movements[a politics of will-to-power] that gave rise to it - that "Alienation" couldn't simply be understood in the Hegelian sense anymore, nothing about it was stirring a negative - no transformation could happen from the subtractive practice of the dialectical [junctive] synthesis that would give rise to a classicist surplus displaced upon the all-totalizing-one.
not even the Marxian understanding of history could totalize the disruptive sound of the noise. its own drama.

There is a very similar pattern that you find in the structure of societies, in the structure of companies, and in the structure of computers, and all three are moving in the same direction, that is, away from a top-down structure of a central command system, giving the system instructions on how to behave, towards a system that is parallel, that is flat, which is a web, in which change moves from the bottom up... and this is going to happen across all institutions and technical devices, it's the way they work.

Nick Land 1994

finally, good advertisement.
BEER stands for Brew, Empty, Empty, Repeat.

pov
the noumena is showing its fangs.

this is the device i post from

"And the Lord repented of the evil which he thought to do unto his people. -Exodus 32:14(KJV);
"And Jehovah saith unto Moses, `Even this thing which thou hast spoken I do; for thou hast found grace in Mine eyes, and I know thee by name.'"Exodus 33:17(YLT)

"[...]between origin and repetition. Writing is, thus, originally hermetic and secondary. Our writing, certainly, but already His. [...] This difference, this negativity in God is our freedom."(Derrida; Writing and Difference)

"The idea of the book is the idea of a totality, finite or infinite, of the signifier; this totality of the signifier cannot be a totality, unless a totality constituted by the signified preexists it, supervises its innoscriptions and its signs, and is independent of it in its ideality."
J. Derrida; Of Grammatology