Blockchain Notes | Roman Side Timeus – Telegram
Blockchain Notes | Roman Side Timeus
5 subscribers
18 photos
1 video
23 links
Blog of Roman Saidulin CEO Timeus Lab

Our projects: zyx.network, piranhas.finance, pandabrick.art, atomic.green, etc

For PM use bot @icomapconnect_bot
Download Telegram
Let's talk about Ton.

Here are a couple of thoughts about the problem, which Durov and co were offered to solve, but ...

Reception with kyc is good and I also use it in my project, but ...
Prove to regulators that this is a solution to the problems, solve them — a long process and an expensive one.

Because I always say that it will be a hard struggle.

And most importantly, I pitch a lot to people who can, like mentors, help get through to reg. authorities of different countries. And at least start a discussion on this topic.

Ton like a crypto coin cannot afford to be exchanged for an anonymous crypto. And this is important.

Otherwise, this is the AML gateway.

Have you noticed that none of the regulator suggested the parameters that a coin should have in order to be accepted and allowed?

On the semi-conditions, several stably are allowed on the exchanges, with the possibility of entering / exiting Fiat.

 And also, under the terms of smart contracts and proxies in them, any account can be frozen upon request.

And all this is pegged to the US dollar. Goal - trading on the stock exchange. But it is impossible to withdraw, the same cue ball, to your wallet.

This is all that the community has achieved in 10 years, in terms of interaction with the real world.

Therefore, such a push occurs in the privat blockchains of companies. There everything is the same, only works between companies or within a single large company.

And no problems with adi to the fiat.

The private development market is growing. And many ico, make their project in the hope of selling a box solution and soar on the news, about new cooperation agreements and partners.

Author @RomanSide
Why ICO gave X (one of the reasons)

I'll write the obvious thing ...

The ICO chip was very simple. When the market cap was 400 yards and above, almost all good projects had caps higher than the budgets that request new projects (ICO) for development. Almost any blockchain had a cap over $ 100 million. At the same time, the new project-blockchain at the ICO stage could not ask for more than reasonable market limits ($ 15-40 million). Thus, any adequate ICO automatically had upside to its competitors. It remains only to wait for the listing on the stock exchange and take profit.

Who is all pampilus? There are a lot of different opinions here, but considering the inflated bubble, the market really went crazy and began to evaluate projects very highly. Everything we did, we were the first to try to get on ICO (multi-gas, gas wars, pools, privates) and then sell these tokens to more greedy and larger investors.

Accordingly, today the ICO does not shoot exactly for the same reason. The upside is not on the market, the new blockchain with a cap of 30 million is unlikely to give X, as there are its competitors in the market at the same price or cheaper.

Buying active, but sagging projects on the bottom now looks more interesting. Therefore, such a decline in activity.

ICO will save only pamp and revaluation of the entire market. After that, the ICO will again become pamped and dumped, because their very nature and mechanism is very speculative. Everything happens just like in an IPO, only with lower liquidity, sharper movements (X) occur.

Author Sergey icodrops
Element group (remember this?) Company from Los Angeles, surrender.

Like many, leave the market in private transaction services.

That is, instead of offering a new model to the market, like many high-supporters, they changed direction.

Now, in my opinion, only a few agencies, including mine, offer the usual model in VC: financing in rounds. To make the product and pamps / dumps avoided.

Yes, they want a high appraisal of a startup right away.
Yes, they want more zeros in the account.

But this is not always good. Many projects have been blown away, many come to the conclusion that it will not be possible to launch a project tokenomy to generate a profit.

We can say that we have waited for the very moment when the projects will be real, with the values ​​that can generate progressive growth on the charts.
Just made new episode of cryptofoggy news
About information, allegedly bitcoin crushed to CME canceled trades, if the asset is worth less than $ 100 billion

In a response to a request in CME, “there are no rules on turnover or size of trade to add or remove futures from trading”
The XEM exchange rate has suffered catastrophic drops from this time a year ago, just as many other ambitious cryptocurrency projects have suffered, now the NEM Foundation is facing challenging budget decisions. We are in a tough spot like many others in this space. It is our duty to act quickly to ensure the longevity of the NEM ecosystem and development.

The reality of having one month left in funding means we won’t be able to support our current headcount, partnerships, and projects. We need to put everything on hold. This is painful since it hurts good people and partners, but the new council is aligned that we need to be transparent with what is happening behind the scenes of the NEM Foundation.

https://forum.nem.io/t/nem-foundation-message-to-the-community/21753