🆕 Gitcoin Grants GG24 temp check: narrow (4–6) vs broad (8–12+) domain set, Snapshot vote asks stewards to weigh tradeoffs
This is a temp check on whether Gitcoin Grants GG24 should fund a narrow set of domains (recommended 4–6) for clearer messaging, higher execution quality, and operational efficiency, or a broader set (8–12+) to increase innovation, inclusivity, co-funding, network effects, and decentralization, with a hybrid clustered approach as a possible compromise. A Snapshot vote will decide domain count; there have been no community discussions, and stewards are being asked to weigh the tradeoffs between clarity/efficiency and inclusivity/innovation.
⏩ More details
This is a temp check on whether Gitcoin Grants GG24 should fund a narrow set of domains (recommended 4–6) for clearer messaging, higher execution quality, and operational efficiency, or a broader set (8–12+) to increase innovation, inclusivity, co-funding, network effects, and decentralization, with a hybrid clustered approach as a possible compromise. A Snapshot vote will decide domain count; there have been no community discussions, and stewards are being asked to weigh the tradeoffs between clarity/efficiency and inclusivity/innovation.
⏩ More details
🆕 MakerDAO ecosystem-team requests 3,000,000 USDS from Accessibility Reward to route via multisig for Atlas Edit
- This is a request by ecosystem-team, as Accessibility Facilitator, for 3,000,000 USDS from the Accessibility Reward budget and to route those funds through a designated multisig wallet (0x05F471262d15EECA4059DadE070e5BEd509a4e73) to implement the Atlas Edit. \n- Benefit: formalizes access to budgeted funds and creates a controlled disbursement mechanism to accelerate A.2.4 initiatives and improve accountability; Cost: 3,000,000 USDS; Community reaction: no discussions.
⏩ More details
- This is a request by ecosystem-team, as Accessibility Facilitator, for 3,000,000 USDS from the Accessibility Reward budget and to route those funds through a designated multisig wallet (0x05F471262d15EECA4059DadE070e5BEd509a4e73) to implement the Atlas Edit. \n- Benefit: formalizes access to budgeted funds and creates a controlled disbursement mechanism to accelerate A.2.4 initiatives and improve accountability; Cost: 3,000,000 USDS; Community reaction: no discussions.
⏩ More details
🆕 imrulo.eth proposes ENS pilot to onboard 1,000 Latino identities in Serbia via 20 Latin dance events, issuing LAT.ETH subdomains and POAPs, requests 15,000 USDC
A proposal by imrulo.eth to pilot “Cultural Defense Mission: Evangelizing ENS to Latinos Across the Balkans Through Latin Dance” in Serbia seeks to onboard 1,000 Latino identities via 20 Latin dance + ENS events over five months, issuing LAT.ETH subdomains and POAPs with a progressive funding request of 15,000 USDC (3,000 USDC monthly tied to milestone unlocks). Benefits include scalable ENS user growth, cultural identity preservation, and alignment with ENS DAO public goods goals; costs are the 15,000 USDC and operational execution risk tied to meeting monthly milestones, and there have been no community discussions so far.
⏩ More details
A proposal by imrulo.eth to pilot “Cultural Defense Mission: Evangelizing ENS to Latinos Across the Balkans Through Latin Dance” in Serbia seeks to onboard 1,000 Latino identities via 20 Latin dance + ENS events over five months, issuing LAT.ETH subdomains and POAPs with a progressive funding request of 15,000 USDC (3,000 USDC monthly tied to milestone unlocks). Benefits include scalable ENS user growth, cultural identity preservation, and alignment with ENS DAO public goods goals; costs are the 15,000 USDC and operational execution risk tied to meeting monthly milestones, and there have been no community discussions so far.
⏩ More details
🆕 zksync proposal: 37.5M ZK capped minter funds two-season Tally Staker pilot (10M ZK Oct 1 2025, 25M ZK Jan 2026) — 30-day streamed rewards, delegation required, 3–10% auto-adjusting APY to boost voting power
A proposal to run a ZK Token Staking pilot using Tally’s Staker contracts funded by a parent capped minter of 37.5M ZK (rate-limited to 10M ZK/month between 1 October 2025 and 31 December 2026) across two seasons (Season 1: 10M ZK rewards, 400M ZK stake target, launch 1 October 2025; Season 2: 25M ZK rewards, 1B ZK stake target, launch January 2026), with rewards streamed in 30-day epochs, reward rates starting near 3% and auto-adjusting up to 10% APY, delegation required, and governance/security controls (Program Administrator multisig, Security Council pauser, public mint tracking). Benefits: aims to boost active voting power (+200M Season 1, +500M Season 2), test secure staking infra for decentralized sequencing, and encourage active delegation; costs/risks: up to 37.5M ZK issuance, adjustable reward rates that may lower APY, potential pause/cancellation if targets aren’t met or incidents occur; community reaction: no discussions to date.
⏩ More details
A proposal to run a ZK Token Staking pilot using Tally’s Staker contracts funded by a parent capped minter of 37.5M ZK (rate-limited to 10M ZK/month between 1 October 2025 and 31 December 2026) across two seasons (Season 1: 10M ZK rewards, 400M ZK stake target, launch 1 October 2025; Season 2: 25M ZK rewards, 1B ZK stake target, launch January 2026), with rewards streamed in 30-day epochs, reward rates starting near 3% and auto-adjusting up to 10% APY, delegation required, and governance/security controls (Program Administrator multisig, Security Council pauser, public mint tracking). Benefits: aims to boost active voting power (+200M Season 1, +500M Season 2), test secure staking infra for decentralized sequencing, and encourage active delegation; costs/risks: up to 37.5M ZK issuance, adjustable reward rates that may lower APY, potential pause/cancellation if targets aren’t met or incidents occur; community reaction: no discussions to date.
⏩ More details
🆕 dYdX: Season 5 ends; Season 6 design published, rewards and wash‑trading analysis completed, on‑chain distribution DRC planned
Season 5 of the dYdX Surge Program concluded on 31 August 2025 at 23:59:59 UTC and Season 6 is now underway, with the team publishing an updated Season 6 design, completing Season 5 reward calculations and wash-trading analysis, and planning to publish proposed distribution details and submit an on-chain distribution DRC to ensure fair, transparent rewards and reduced manipulation. There are no costs reported, and the community has not held any discussions.
⏩ More details
Season 5 of the dYdX Surge Program concluded on 31 August 2025 at 23:59:59 UTC and Season 6 is now underway, with the team publishing an updated Season 6 design, completing Season 5 reward calculations and wash-trading analysis, and planning to publish proposed distribution details and submit an on-chain distribution DRC to ensure fair, transparent rewards and reduced manipulation. There are no costs reported, and the community has not held any discussions.
⏩ More details
🆕 MakerDAO Ecosystem Team requests one-time 8,000,000 USDS transfer to Accessibility Facilitators multisig to fund Sky Simplification transition
- The Ecosystem Team requests a one-time transfer of 8,000,000 USDS to a multisig controlled by the Accessibility Facilitators (0xd8507ef0a59f37d15b5d7b630fa6eea40ce4afdd) to serve as an operational buffer for contributor teams, Sky Agents, and to fund the short-term roadmap during the Sky Simplification Project transition. \n- Benefit: preserves continuity and centralized, structured fund management for the transition; Cost: a single 8,000,000 USDS allocation; Community reaction: no discussions have occurred.
⏩ More details
- The Ecosystem Team requests a one-time transfer of 8,000,000 USDS to a multisig controlled by the Accessibility Facilitators (0xd8507ef0a59f37d15b5d7b630fa6eea40ce4afdd) to serve as an operational buffer for contributor teams, Sky Agents, and to fund the short-term roadmap during the Sky Simplification Project transition. \n- Benefit: preserves continuity and centralized, structured fund management for the transition; Cost: a single 8,000,000 USDS allocation; Community reaction: no discussions have occurred.
⏩ More details
🆕 ENS Contributor Gateway proposal: three-tier milestone funding (bounties, project grants, core contributor streams) with seven-member Grants Council and pilot 50 ETH + 100k USDC
SpikeWatanabe.eth proposes the ENS Contributor Gateway, a three-tier, milestone-driven funding framework (Tier 1: bounties, Tier 2: project grants, Tier 3: core contributor streams) overseen by a seven-member Grants Council to professionalize onboarding, expand the contributor pool, and reduce reliance on retroactive funding. Benefits: lowers entry barriers, creates predictable funding and KPIs, and supports sustained contributor roles; costs/risks: added administration, potential deadweight loss, and centralization risk from new governance layers (pilot budget suggested at 50 ETH and 100,000 USDC, both TBD); community reaction: none to date.
⏩ More details
SpikeWatanabe.eth proposes the ENS Contributor Gateway, a three-tier, milestone-driven funding framework (Tier 1: bounties, Tier 2: project grants, Tier 3: core contributor streams) overseen by a seven-member Grants Council to professionalize onboarding, expand the contributor pool, and reduce reliance on retroactive funding. Benefits: lowers entry barriers, creates predictable funding and KPIs, and supports sustained contributor roles; costs/risks: added administration, potential deadweight loss, and centralization risk from new governance layers (pilot budget suggested at 50 ETH and 100,000 USDC, both TBD); community reaction: none to date.
⏩ More details
❤1
🆕 MakerDAO proposal: move funds from near-zero USDC/DAI LPs into ~4% USDC yields via 1:1 stablecoin module, estimated ~$1.5M/yr benefit; limited community input, rune endorses
This proposes withdrawing funds from two near-zero-yield USDC/DAI LPs (0.06% and 0.02%) and redeploying them into higher-APR USDC opportunities (~4.1%+), relying on a 1:1 stablecoin module for liquidity; benefit: an estimated ~1.5 million USD additional profit per year and simpler treasury operations. Community input is limited (one reply), with rune endorsing execution and estimating the ~1.5m annual benefit; no direct costs were specified beyond the opportunity to rebalance liquidity positions.
⏩ More details
This proposes withdrawing funds from two near-zero-yield USDC/DAI LPs (0.06% and 0.02%) and redeploying them into higher-APR USDC opportunities (~4.1%+), relying on a 1:1 stablecoin module for liquidity; benefit: an estimated ~1.5 million USD additional profit per year and simpler treasury operations. Community input is limited (one reply), with rune endorsing execution and estimating the ~1.5m annual benefit; no direct costs were specified beyond the opportunity to rebalance liquidity positions.
⏩ More details
🆕 Audit finds critical reward-accounting and staking-vote flaws in Compensator; partners deem code unsuitable for Compound, grant termination underway
An audit by jbass-oz of camconrad/compensator (commit fd69763) conducted from 2025-08-19 to 2025-08-27 found systemic design and implementation flaws in Compensator.sol and CompensatorFactory.sol—most critically a reward-accounting bug that fails to decrease availableRewards on claims and a staking-vote mismatch that can lock or forfeit winning stakers’ funds—leading auditors to advise against production use due to risks to funds, governance correctness, and integrity. The community response is limited but decisive: maintainers say staking for/against specific proposals was already removed, partners (OZ and Certora) deem the code unsuitable for Compound, and Compound governance partners have moved to terminate the Compensator grant.
⏩ More details
An audit by jbass-oz of camconrad/compensator (commit fd69763) conducted from 2025-08-19 to 2025-08-27 found systemic design and implementation flaws in Compensator.sol and CompensatorFactory.sol—most critically a reward-accounting bug that fails to decrease availableRewards on claims and a staking-vote mismatch that can lock or forfeit winning stakers’ funds—leading auditors to advise against production use due to risks to funds, governance correctness, and integrity. The community response is limited but decisive: maintainers say staking for/against specific proposals was already removed, partners (OZ and Certora) deem the code unsuitable for Compound, and Compound governance partners have moved to terminate the Compensator grant.
⏩ More details
🆕 Chaos Labs proposes 4,761,905 DYDX (~$3M) reward pool to incentivize genuine trading on dYdX Chain, with wash trading filters and pending governance vote
- Chaos Labs proposes distributing 4,761,905 DYDX (a $3,000,000 reward pool: $2,250,000 to traders by fees and $750,000 to traders using public UIs) from the dYdX Chain Community Treasury to reward genuine trading and encourage use of dYdX.trade and mobile apps, with wash trading filtered out via their methodology. \n- The cost is the 4,761,905 DYDX treasury allocation; implementation requires an on-chain governance vote sponsored by Chaos Labs, and there have been no community discussions to date.
⏩ More details
- Chaos Labs proposes distributing 4,761,905 DYDX (a $3,000,000 reward pool: $2,250,000 to traders by fees and $750,000 to traders using public UIs) from the dYdX Chain Community Treasury to reward genuine trading and encourage use of dYdX.trade and mobile apps, with wash trading filtered out via their methodology. \n- The cost is the 4,761,905 DYDX treasury allocation; implementation requires an on-chain governance vote sponsored by Chaos Labs, and there have been no community discussions to date.
⏩ More details
🆕 SafeDAO: OBRA initiatives complete and payouts processed; SEP‑37 cut to 37,000 USDC, SEP‑14 rescoped to 157,500 USDC, SEP‑12 revised to 32,430 USDC
All OBRA initiatives have completed their milestones and payouts have been processed, with material budget revisions: SEP 37 reduced to 37,000 USDC (from 75,000 USDC), SEP 14 rescoped to 157,500 USDC (from 180,000 USDC), and SEP 12 revised to 32,430 USDC (from 30,000 USDC) due to VAT; detailed breakdowns are available on the CES Hub. The changes improve delivery clarity, cost-efficiency, and compliance while enhancing transparency and accountability, and there have been no community discussions.
⏩ More details
All OBRA initiatives have completed their milestones and payouts have been processed, with material budget revisions: SEP 37 reduced to 37,000 USDC (from 75,000 USDC), SEP 14 rescoped to 157,500 USDC (from 180,000 USDC), and SEP 12 revised to 32,430 USDC (from 30,000 USDC) due to VAT; detailed breakdowns are available on the CES Hub. The changes improve delivery clarity, cost-efficiency, and compliance while enhancing transparency and accountability, and there have been no community discussions.
⏩ More details
🆕 MakerDAO Atlas Core Dev defines Sept 2025 payment process; funding requests (with signatures) due Sept 9 for Sept 18 executive
This is an official record of Atlas Core Development payments for the September 2025 monthly spell, outlining that eligible ADs, individuals, or teams must submit funding requests (including Ethereum payout addresses, SKY/USDS amounts, denoscriptions, and cryptographic signatures for new addresses) for Support Facilitator approval with Atlas Axis consultation to ensure aligned, secure payments. The process improves scheduling and payment authorization but may delay late submissions to the next month; community input is limited (contributors listed: BLUE and cloaky via adamfraser), and requests must be submitted by September 9th, 2025, EOD for inclusion in the executive scheduled for September 18th, 2025.
⏩ More details
This is an official record of Atlas Core Development payments for the September 2025 monthly spell, outlining that eligible ADs, individuals, or teams must submit funding requests (including Ethereum payout addresses, SKY/USDS amounts, denoscriptions, and cryptographic signatures for new addresses) for Support Facilitator approval with Atlas Axis consultation to ensure aligned, secure payments. The process improves scheduling and payment authorization but may delay late submissions to the next month; community input is limited (contributors listed: BLUE and cloaky via adamfraser), and requests must be submitted by September 9th, 2025, EOD for inclusion in the executive scheduled for September 18th, 2025.
⏩ More details
🆕 Proposal to deploy Uniswap v3 on Ronin with $1M RON + $500k UNI matched incentives and migration of Katana liquidity
- This proposes deploying Uniswap v3 on Ronin, with Ronin offering $1,000,000 in RON incentives matched by $500,000 in UNI from the Uniswap DAO, migration of chain-owned liquidity from Katana, GFX Labs/Oku/Wormhole handling deployment/UX/bridging, and a 6-month co-incentive program weighted 75% to BTC/ETH/stable pairs and 25% to gaming token pools.
- Benefits: consolidates liquidity to make Uniswap v3 the canonical DEX on Ronin, accelerates DeFi–gaming integration, supports PHPC as a core stablecoin, and attracts LPs/traders via matched incentives; costs: $1,000,000 RON + $500,000 UNI in incentives and migration operational overhead; community reaction: Snapshot shows strong support (2,514,181.20 votes for vs 4,647.89 against) but quorum of 10,000,000 votes has not been reached.
⏩ More details
- This proposes deploying Uniswap v3 on Ronin, with Ronin offering $1,000,000 in RON incentives matched by $500,000 in UNI from the Uniswap DAO, migration of chain-owned liquidity from Katana, GFX Labs/Oku/Wormhole handling deployment/UX/bridging, and a 6-month co-incentive program weighted 75% to BTC/ETH/stable pairs and 25% to gaming token pools.
- Benefits: consolidates liquidity to make Uniswap v3 the canonical DEX on Ronin, accelerates DeFi–gaming integration, supports PHPC as a core stablecoin, and attracts LPs/traders via matched incentives; costs: $1,000,000 RON + $500,000 UNI in incentives and migration operational overhead; community reaction: Snapshot shows strong support (2,514,181.20 votes for vs 4,647.89 against) but quorum of 10,000,000 votes has not been reached.
⏩ More details
🆕 Gauntlet proposes $2.3M one‑year Compound Comet risk‑management renewal for up to 50 deployments — 70% paid in COMP, 30% held as refundable insolvency fund with 30% refund mechanism; no material insolvencies (unpaid debt $904.10)
Gauntlet proposes a one‑year renewal (2025-09-28 to 2026-09-28) to provide risk management for up to 50 Comet deployments—including 24/7 monitoring, parameter recommendations, IR curve tuning, COMP optimization campaigns, and strategic support—with a 30% insolvency refund mechanism and a track record of no material market‑risk insolvencies (unpaid debt $904.10 as of 2025-08-21). \nBenefits: stronger risk posture, capital‑efficiency and incentive optimization, and proven governance outputs; Costs/constraints: $2.3M fixed fee (70% streamed in COMP, 30% initial Insolvency Fund 50% USDC/50% COMP refundable only for market‑risk/oracle losses with exclusions and subject to governance), development/auditing are out of scope; there have been no community discussions to date.
⏩ More details
Gauntlet proposes a one‑year renewal (2025-09-28 to 2026-09-28) to provide risk management for up to 50 Comet deployments—including 24/7 monitoring, parameter recommendations, IR curve tuning, COMP optimization campaigns, and strategic support—with a 30% insolvency refund mechanism and a track record of no material market‑risk insolvencies (unpaid debt $904.10 as of 2025-08-21). \nBenefits: stronger risk posture, capital‑efficiency and incentive optimization, and proven governance outputs; Costs/constraints: $2.3M fixed fee (70% streamed in COMP, 30% initial Insolvency Fund 50% USDC/50% COMP refundable only for market‑risk/oracle losses with exclusions and subject to governance), development/auditing are out of scope; there have been no community discussions to date.
⏩ More details
🆕 Proposal to use "Ask ChatGPT (with Web search API on)" to automate Gitcoin treasury payouts for DeSci and open source, promising faster low‑overhead grants amid skepticism about AI decisioning
vporton proposes using \"Ask ChatGPT (with Web search API on)\" to allocate Gitcoin treasury funds for DeSci and open source projects (Medium post published on 02 Sep 2025), aiming for weekly or monthly payouts, minimal grant prep, and a few days' dev work (mentions Cursor) to implement. Benefits claimed: faster, lower-overhead, standardized impartial allocations; costs/risks: skepticism about AI-led decisioning and potential dystopian outcomes; community reaction is limited and skeptical (one pointed comment noting it already feels \"dystopian (but hilarious)\").
⏩ More details
vporton proposes using \"Ask ChatGPT (with Web search API on)\" to allocate Gitcoin treasury funds for DeSci and open source projects (Medium post published on 02 Sep 2025), aiming for weekly or monthly payouts, minimal grant prep, and a few days' dev work (mentions Cursor) to implement. Benefits claimed: faster, lower-overhead, standardized impartial allocations; costs/risks: skepticism about AI-led decisioning and potential dystopian outcomes; community reaction is limited and skeptical (one pointed comment noting it already feels \"dystopian (but hilarious)\").
⏩ More details
🆕 Gitcoin launches Domain Operator Success Program (LuukDAO, MontyMerlin) to prep domains for Grants GG24 — operator curriculum, co‑funding, reduced fragmentation; proposals due Sep 8, vote from Sep 11, early reaction limited but positive
- This announces the Domain Operator Success Program led by LuukDAO and MontyMerlin to prepare and aggregate domains for Gitcoin Grants GG24 (Domain Preparation, Operator Curriculum, Mentorship, Support Resources, Attestations) so proposals are operationally viable, fundable, and less fragmented; domains under consideration include Ethereum Developer Tooling & Infrastructure, User Sovereignty, Open Data & Analytics, Public Goods R&D, and Targeted Development & Adoption. \n- Benefits: clearer scopes, co‑funding commitments, reduced fragmentation, and better appeal to funders/operators; costs/requirements: domain budgets including operator fees, concrete co‑funding (ideally in a Safe), and defined asks to Gitcoin (matching pool/support); proposals due on Monday, 8 September 2024 with final recommendations to enable a Gitcoin vote beginning on 11 September 2024, and community reaction so far is limited but positive.
⏩ More details
- This announces the Domain Operator Success Program led by LuukDAO and MontyMerlin to prepare and aggregate domains for Gitcoin Grants GG24 (Domain Preparation, Operator Curriculum, Mentorship, Support Resources, Attestations) so proposals are operationally viable, fundable, and less fragmented; domains under consideration include Ethereum Developer Tooling & Infrastructure, User Sovereignty, Open Data & Analytics, Public Goods R&D, and Targeted Development & Adoption. \n- Benefits: clearer scopes, co‑funding commitments, reduced fragmentation, and better appeal to funders/operators; costs/requirements: domain budgets including operator fees, concrete co‑funding (ideally in a Safe), and defined asks to Gitcoin (matching pool/support); proposals due on Monday, 8 September 2024 with final recommendations to enable a Gitcoin vote beginning on 11 September 2024, and community reaction so far is limited but positive.
⏩ More details
🆕 Scroll EGC proposes framework prioritizing builder onboarding, liquidity, PMF and treasury diversification into stablecoins
This is a strategic framework for the Ecosystem Growth Council (EGC) to prioritize builder onboarding, liquidity/economic infrastructure, user acquisition, and coordination with Community Council to align funding toward product-market-fit (PMF), real-world SCR uses, and measurable ecosystem outcomes; expected benefits are stronger founder pipelines, durable liquidity, reduced SCR sell pressure via treasury diversification, and more sustainable growth. It excludes pure token speculation and short-term farming (which may limit rapid user spikes), there have been no community discussions, and a Treasury Management vote will select a service provider to enable diversification into stablecoins.
⏩ More details
This is a strategic framework for the Ecosystem Growth Council (EGC) to prioritize builder onboarding, liquidity/economic infrastructure, user acquisition, and coordination with Community Council to align funding toward product-market-fit (PMF), real-world SCR uses, and measurable ecosystem outcomes; expected benefits are stronger founder pipelines, durable liquidity, reduced SCR sell pressure via treasury diversification, and more sustainable growth. It excludes pure token speculation and short-term farming (which may limit rapid user spikes), there have been no community discussions, and a Treasury Management vote will select a service provider to enable diversification into stablecoins.
⏩ More details
🆕 lochie2001 proposes performance-based funding for Jupiter WGs — aims to cut waste and boost accountability, risks defunding projects and lacks community discussion
lochie2001 proposes tying Work Group (WG) funding to measurable performance for JupiterExchange, posted at 8:50 PM on 1 Sep 2025, aiming to fund only WGs that “deliver real value” and to make budgets accountable and performance-driven, which could reduce waste and increase transparency and resource efficiency. The cost is potential defunding or pressure on underperforming WGs (changing incentives and risking lost projects or contributors), and there have been no community discussions.
⏩ More details
lochie2001 proposes tying Work Group (WG) funding to measurable performance for JupiterExchange, posted at 8:50 PM on 1 Sep 2025, aiming to fund only WGs that “deliver real value” and to make budgets accountable and performance-driven, which could reduce waste and increase transparency and resource efficiency. The cost is potential defunding or pressure on underperforming WGs (changing incentives and risking lost projects or contributors), and there have been no community discussions.
⏩ More details
🆕 Tiza proposes Polygon grant of 5,000–10,000 POL to fund _Gideon5’s Twitter educational threads, infographics and guides promoting zkEVM, DeFi and gaming
Tiza proposes a Polygon Community Grant for Gideon5 to produce Twitter-based educational content (2+ Polygon-focused threads weekly, infographics, beginner guides, monthly analytics) to promote zkEVM, DeFi, and gaming, requesting 5,000–10,000 POL to cover research, design tools, and time, with willingness to collaborate if no direct grant. \nIf funded, expected benefits are increased awareness, user onboarding, and measurable community growth on Twitter; estimated cost is the requested 5,000–10,000 POL, and there have been no community discussions to date.
⏩ More details
Tiza proposes a Polygon Community Grant for Gideon5 to produce Twitter-based educational content (2+ Polygon-focused threads weekly, infographics, beginner guides, monthly analytics) to promote zkEVM, DeFi, and gaming, requesting 5,000–10,000 POL to cover research, design tools, and time, with willingness to collaborate if no direct grant. \nIf funded, expected benefits are increased awareness, user onboarding, and measurable community growth on Twitter; estimated cost is the requested 5,000–10,000 POL, and there have been no community discussions to date.
⏩ More details