Forwarded from Watcher Guru
🔥1
Crypto Mumbles
i do believe icm returns as well maybe later in the year when conditions get better it will probably be a banger (and proper) meta revisit this in q4
looking good rn
things are slowly lining up
the market finds a way
there are already hints of it the past weeks
plenty of icm projects, but only a few good ones, and its likely the few good ones will get slapped huge premiums in speculative nature
things are slowly lining up
the market finds a way
there are already hints of it the past weeks
plenty of icm projects, but only a few good ones, and its likely the few good ones will get slapped huge premiums in speculative nature
🔥2
for now still majority in clear big caps as they are pulling to the upside
the time to rotate down into the trenches should be quite obvious
at that point, my play would be to lower the stack and crank up the risk
going to be patient and observe as usual
the time to rotate down into the trenches should be quite obvious
at that point, my play would be to lower the stack and crank up the risk
going to be patient and observe as usual
👍5🔥1
Forwarded from Watcher Guru
🔥2
Forwarded from Ian's Intel
ETF Flows: 10 Sep 2025
🟢 Bitcoin ETFs: $741.5M net inflows
🟢 Ethereum ETFs: $171.5M net inflows
🟢 Bitcoin ETFs: $741.5M net inflows
🟢 Ethereum ETFs: $171.5M net inflows
🔥1
Forwarded from Zoomer News
NATIVE MARKETS SURGES TO 90% ODDS TO WIN THE USDH TICKER ON POLYMARKET AFTER ALLEGATIONS THAT ANOTHER CONTENDER IS ATTEMPTING TO “BRIBE” VOTERS
🔗 velo.xyz
🔗 velo.xyz
🔥1
Forwarded from humblespace
". . . The thing I would say is, when you grow up, you tend to get told that the world is the way it is, and your life is just to live your life inside the world. Try not to bash into the walls too much. Try to have a nice family life, have fun, save a little money. But life, that's a very limited life. Life can be much broader once you discover one simple fact, and that is: Everything around you that you call life was made up by people that were no smarter than you. And you can change it. You can influence it. You can build your own things that other people can use. And the minute that you understand that you can poke life, and actually something will, you know, if you push in, something will pop out the other side, that you can change it. You can mold it. That's maybe the most important thing is to shake off this erroneous notion that life is there and you're just going to live in it, versus embrace it. Change it. Improve it. Make your mark upon it. I think that's very important. And however you learn that, once you learn it, you'll want to change life and make it better. Because it's kind of messed up in a lot of ways. Once you learn that, you'll never be the same again."
Steve Jobs Secrets of Life
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kYfNvmF0Bqw
YouTube
Steve Jobs Secrets of Life
In 1994, the Santa Clara Valley Historical Association interviewed Steve Jobs. What he said during this unnoscripted film interview is remarkable. In this footage, Steve talks about his values, advice to entrepreneurs and his thoughts on how to best live life.…
🔥2👍1
Forwarded from Modo Capital
the feedback loop between real-world events and the incentives baked into prediction markets:
Jim Bell’s Assasination Politics is a series of essays outlining a system where privacy crypto could be used to fund and incentivize political assassinations. His logic was the following:
1. A public market exists where people anonymously place bounties on politicians or public figures by contributing crypto.
2. Assassins submit an encrypted “prediction” of when/where/how the target will die.
3. When the assassination occurs, the assassin reveals their prediction + proof, which matches reality.
4. The market pays them out automatically.
The U.S. government treated it as a serious threat. Bell himself was relentlessly targeted by law enforcement. He ended up in prison multiple times.
As we progress deeper into a hyper-financialised future, assasination markets could make a return in subversive ways.
Currently, predictions on adverse outcomes for high status individuals have mostly existed in a low liquidity phase. low enough size and interest that nobody’s really going to risk prison.
Yet, as betting market pie increases, suddenly interesting incentives pop up.
Incentive to Prevent Payouts: A big actor with exposure could have reason to discourage an adverse outcome from materializing in the real world (funding think tanks, campaigns, even ops).
Incentive to Cause Payouts: Conversely, if the liquidity pool gets large enough for an adverse outcome, the incentive may shift to individuals helping create these events. And thus, prediction markets move beyond betting on the outcomes, and into creating outcomes.
So suddenly you have this perverse, memetic casino where the probability of the event itself is warped by who’s trading it in a reflexive manner. And in this environment the real danger is that someone with size realizes the cheapest way to shape the world isn’t ads or lobbying, it’s simply buying enough contracts in a prediction market to create new incentive gradients in reality.
Jim Bell’s Assasination Politics is a series of essays outlining a system where privacy crypto could be used to fund and incentivize political assassinations. His logic was the following:
1. A public market exists where people anonymously place bounties on politicians or public figures by contributing crypto.
2. Assassins submit an encrypted “prediction” of when/where/how the target will die.
3. When the assassination occurs, the assassin reveals their prediction + proof, which matches reality.
4. The market pays them out automatically.
The U.S. government treated it as a serious threat. Bell himself was relentlessly targeted by law enforcement. He ended up in prison multiple times.
As we progress deeper into a hyper-financialised future, assasination markets could make a return in subversive ways.
Currently, predictions on adverse outcomes for high status individuals have mostly existed in a low liquidity phase. low enough size and interest that nobody’s really going to risk prison.
Yet, as betting market pie increases, suddenly interesting incentives pop up.
Incentive to Prevent Payouts: A big actor with exposure could have reason to discourage an adverse outcome from materializing in the real world (funding think tanks, campaigns, even ops).
Incentive to Cause Payouts: Conversely, if the liquidity pool gets large enough for an adverse outcome, the incentive may shift to individuals helping create these events. And thus, prediction markets move beyond betting on the outcomes, and into creating outcomes.
So suddenly you have this perverse, memetic casino where the probability of the event itself is warped by who’s trading it in a reflexive manner. And in this environment the real danger is that someone with size realizes the cheapest way to shape the world isn’t ads or lobbying, it’s simply buying enough contracts in a prediction market to create new incentive gradients in reality.
🔥3