https://army.thelobbyx.com/?sphere=it
Обережно, читати ці вакансії може бути боляче
Обережно, читати ці вакансії може бути боляче
Lobby X
Lobby X – платформа з працевлаштування та рекрутингова агенція.Працевлаштовуємо задля прогресу та перемоги України
Forwarded from HN Best Comments
Re: What I learned getting acquired by Google
The "red badge" thing was very real. It was really weird having TVCs on your team. You'd all work hard together to launch a thing, and then everybody except the red badge would get a celebratory team tchotchke or a team lunch or something. If you asked about it, the manager would say "we can't give Jim things directly because that might be like compensation and they'd be like an employee." There'd be all-hands meetings they couldn't go to, or seemingly arbitrary doors they couldn't open or internal sites they couldn't see. If you worked with a TVC, you'd get training that felt like you were learning how to own a House Elf: "Remember, never give them clothing or they'll be free! And report them if they ever claim to work for Google."
CobrastanJorji, 1 hour ago
The "red badge" thing was very real. It was really weird having TVCs on your team. You'd all work hard together to launch a thing, and then everybody except the red badge would get a celebratory team tchotchke or a team lunch or something. If you asked about it, the manager would say "we can't give Jim things directly because that might be like compensation and they'd be like an employee." There'd be all-hands meetings they couldn't go to, or seemingly arbitrary doors they couldn't open or internal sites they couldn't see. If you worked with a TVC, you'd get training that felt like you were learning how to own a House Elf: "Remember, never give them clothing or they'll be free! And report them if they ever claim to work for Google."
CobrastanJorji, 1 hour ago
🤯1😢1
HN Best Comments
Re: What I learned getting acquired by Google The "red badge" thing was very real. It was really weird having TVCs on your team. You'd all work hard together to launch a thing, and then everybody except the red badge would get a celebratory team tchotchke…
https://www.reuters.com/article/businesspropicks-us-findlaw-dont-treat-c/dont-treat-contractors-like-employees-idUSTRE53063S20090401
(из треда в комментах)
(из треда в комментах)
Reuters
Don't Treat Contractors Like Employees
Independent Contractors vs. Microsoft
👍2
Dolboeb-driven Development
https://www.reuters.com/article/businesspropicks-us-findlaw-dont-treat-c/dont-treat-contractors-like-employees-idUSTRE53063S20090401 (из треда в комментах)
>Which is because it is extremely rude, like meanest of meanest, to not share food with each other. Like, of all mean but not illegal things you can do to contractors, not sharing food is probably what people consider the worst. Small every day things are way more provocative than abstract things like retirement funds or whatever.
Been there. Done that. The FTEs got strawberries. I didn't. I don't think I have been that pissed off in my life. If someone had wrecked my car on purpose I'd be less pissed.
Been there. Done that. The FTEs got strawberries. I didn't. I don't think I have been that pissed off in my life. If someone had wrecked my car on purpose I'd be less pissed.
👍1
Dolboeb-driven Development
>Which is because it is extremely rude, like meanest of meanest, to not share food with each other. Like, of all mean but not illegal things you can do to contractors, not sharing food is probably what people consider the worst. Small every day things are…
Там прям массовая драма по поводу еды)
>I worked at a big insurance company for a while. Contractors could have their birthday celebrated, but cake was not permitted.
>I worked at a big insurance company for a while. Contractors could have their birthday celebrated, but cake was not permitted.
👍1😁1
Кек)
// SAR - Suspicious Activity Report (когда банк лочит твой счет потому что думает что ты пидр)
// SAR - Suspicious Activity Report (когда банк лочит твой счет потому что думает что ты пидр)
👍1
Forwarded from HN Best Comments
Re: Seeing like a bank
> at some financial institutions, you can get a SAR filed for knowing what a SAR is, because “advanced knowledge of anti-moneylaundering procedure” is a characteristic only of financial professionals and terrorists.
That is messed up. You ask about a SAR or indicate you know about them in general, you get a SAR slapped on you, and they close your account. You're one of hundreds of thousands, why bother handling a SAR-ed user when they can just move on without you.
Are individuals allowed to have a public forum to discuss and share notes of what they did in their account to learn and prevent this from happening in the future? It seems in a lot of cases it's using these payment systems like Zelle or have anything associated with phrases resembling black-listed countries or organization.
rdtsc, 1 day ago
> at some financial institutions, you can get a SAR filed for knowing what a SAR is, because “advanced knowledge of anti-moneylaundering procedure” is a characteristic only of financial professionals and terrorists.
That is messed up. You ask about a SAR or indicate you know about them in general, you get a SAR slapped on you, and they close your account. You're one of hundreds of thousands, why bother handling a SAR-ed user when they can just move on without you.
Are individuals allowed to have a public forum to discuss and share notes of what they did in their account to learn and prevent this from happening in the future? It seems in a lot of cases it's using these payment systems like Zelle or have anything associated with phrases resembling black-listed countries or organization.
rdtsc, 1 day ago
❤2🫡2💩1
Там это, Альтмана с поста СЕО OpenAI слили, со странной формулировкой)
> Sam Altman will depart as CEO and leave the board of directors. Mira Murati, the company’s chief technology officer, will serve as interim CEO, effective immediately.
> Mr. Altman’s departure follows a deliberative review process by the board, which concluded that he was not consistently candid in his communications with the board, hindering its ability to exercise its responsibilities. The board no longer has confidence in his ability to continue leading OpenAI.
Что по сути означает что он пиздел совету директоров о чем-то
> Sam Altman will depart as CEO and leave the board of directors. Mira Murati, the company’s chief technology officer, will serve as interim CEO, effective immediately.
> Mr. Altman’s departure follows a deliberative review process by the board, which concluded that he was not consistently candid in his communications with the board, hindering its ability to exercise its responsibilities. The board no longer has confidence in his ability to continue leading OpenAI.
Что по сути означает что он пиздел совету директоров о чем-то
👍1
Параноидальная версия:
Скрывал что ЧатЖПТ осозналась!!!11
Скрывал что ЧатЖПТ осозналась!!!11
😁6
// (скорее всего) реальная версия - пиздел что возможно ее оптимизировать и выйти на самоокупаемость
🔥2
Forwarded from Brodetskyi. Tech, VC, Startups (Andrii Brodetskyi)
Reading the news last day felt like watching a real-time TV series. The CEO of the world's most important AI company was fired by the board in the middle of the AI revolution.
I read a dozen articles from business media, so you don't have to. In this post, I will recap the key facts and share some thoughts on the situation.
So, the Open AI board of directors fired Sam Altman from the CEO position. The reason for that? Most likely, the power struggle between cofounders, caused by a misalignment of views on the company's future.
Altman wanted to build more powerful AI products faster. He announced starting working on GPT-5 days after the major product update of ChatGPT, the Open AI flagship project. Moreover, he wanted to raise tens of billions of funding from Masayoshi Son and Middle Eastern investors to build a vertically integrated AI company to produce its own chips and AI-driven device.
Open AI cofounder and chief scientist Ilya Sutskever instead was committed to Open AI's original mission: to build a safe AGI aligned with societal values. That misalignment between cofounders caused a power struggle: Sutskever was appointed head of an AI safety project after internal debates, but his role in the company diminished.
So, who actually fired Altman? We must look at the unusual Open AI corporate structure to answer this. The company was started as a non-profit in 2015, committed to researching and building a safe AGI that would empower humanity. In 2019, the company created a for-profit subsidiary that could attract external funding to build new large language models like GPT-3 and actually make money.
Just a few days ago, its board of directors included six members: three Open AI cofounders - Altman, Brockman, and Sutskever, and three independent directors appointed by Open AI non-profit org - the CEO of answers site Quora Adam D'Angelo, tech founder and scientist Tasha McCauley, and AI safety expert Helen Toner.
Notably, no investors were among the board members. Elon Musk left the board in 2018, citing a conflict of interest with Tesla. Reid Hoffman left the board in March 2023, citing a conflict of interest with his ventures: he is a cofounder at Inflection AI and an investor in AI startups through his VC firm, Greylock. Microsoft doesn't have a seat on the board even after investing $10bn into the company.
All three external directors were prominent supporters of AI safety ideas. Together with Sutskever, they had a majority of votes and fired Altman from the CEO position. Open AI's cofounder and president, Greg Brockman, also left the company after learning the news, and at least three senior researchers followed him.
The board's move was a surprise not just for Altman and Brockman but also for the company's biggest investor, Microsoft. According to reports, CEO Satya Nadella was furious and blindsided by the news.
I read a dozen articles from business media, so you don't have to. In this post, I will recap the key facts and share some thoughts on the situation.
So, the Open AI board of directors fired Sam Altman from the CEO position. The reason for that? Most likely, the power struggle between cofounders, caused by a misalignment of views on the company's future.
Altman wanted to build more powerful AI products faster. He announced starting working on GPT-5 days after the major product update of ChatGPT, the Open AI flagship project. Moreover, he wanted to raise tens of billions of funding from Masayoshi Son and Middle Eastern investors to build a vertically integrated AI company to produce its own chips and AI-driven device.
Open AI cofounder and chief scientist Ilya Sutskever instead was committed to Open AI's original mission: to build a safe AGI aligned with societal values. That misalignment between cofounders caused a power struggle: Sutskever was appointed head of an AI safety project after internal debates, but his role in the company diminished.
So, who actually fired Altman? We must look at the unusual Open AI corporate structure to answer this. The company was started as a non-profit in 2015, committed to researching and building a safe AGI that would empower humanity. In 2019, the company created a for-profit subsidiary that could attract external funding to build new large language models like GPT-3 and actually make money.
Just a few days ago, its board of directors included six members: three Open AI cofounders - Altman, Brockman, and Sutskever, and three independent directors appointed by Open AI non-profit org - the CEO of answers site Quora Adam D'Angelo, tech founder and scientist Tasha McCauley, and AI safety expert Helen Toner.
Notably, no investors were among the board members. Elon Musk left the board in 2018, citing a conflict of interest with Tesla. Reid Hoffman left the board in March 2023, citing a conflict of interest with his ventures: he is a cofounder at Inflection AI and an investor in AI startups through his VC firm, Greylock. Microsoft doesn't have a seat on the board even after investing $10bn into the company.
All three external directors were prominent supporters of AI safety ideas. Together with Sutskever, they had a majority of votes and fired Altman from the CEO position. Open AI's cofounder and president, Greg Brockman, also left the company after learning the news, and at least three senior researchers followed him.
The board's move was a surprise not just for Altman and Brockman but also for the company's biggest investor, Microsoft. According to reports, CEO Satya Nadella was furious and blindsided by the news.
👏1🤔1
Forwarded from Новосилецький на дивані
Я прийшов в Х, а рекламодавці з нього йдуть.
Їм не подобається те, що їх рекламні пости з'являються поруч з мемами про нацизм і цитатами Гітлера.
Також і сам Маск антисемітську шизу постив нещодавно.
Тож тепер Твіттер залишився щонайменше без реклами від: IBM, Apple, Lionsgate, Disney, Paramount, Comcast та інших. Список, я думаю, буде поповнюватися.
І без того збиткова платформа, стане ще більш збитковою.
WP
Їм не подобається те, що їх рекламні пости з'являються поруч з мемами про нацизм і цитатами Гітлера.
Також і сам Маск антисемітську шизу постив нещодавно.
Тож тепер Твіттер залишився щонайменше без реклами від: IBM, Apple, Lionsgate, Disney, Paramount, Comcast та інших. Список, я думаю, буде поповнюватися.
І без того збиткова платформа, стане ще більш збитковою.
WP
👍14
Блять, походу Copilot вырубается если в файле есть кириллица (раньше работало)