This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥Dr. Peter McCullough says his foundation funded a comprehensive review of 136 studies and revisited a question federal agencies have not examined in full since 2004.
💉His conclusion: multiple childhood vaccines list encephalitis in their own inserts, and the neurodevelopmental conditions rising in children align with what he describes as post-encephalitic injury.
Del notes years of searching for the large body of evidence once promised to prove no link. One mother’s framing stands out: autism as a symptom of brain injury, not a standalone mystery.
🛑McCullough’s position is unequivocal. Pause the childhood schedule. End mandates across schools, military, and universities.
The burden now shifts to public health authorities to respond.
@delbigtree
💉His conclusion: multiple childhood vaccines list encephalitis in their own inserts, and the neurodevelopmental conditions rising in children align with what he describes as post-encephalitic injury.
Del notes years of searching for the large body of evidence once promised to prove no link. One mother’s framing stands out: autism as a symptom of brain injury, not a standalone mystery.
🛑McCullough’s position is unequivocal. Pause the childhood schedule. End mandates across schools, military, and universities.
The burden now shifts to public health authorities to respond.
@delbigtree
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🚨"Science is not really about truth, it's about power.”
If science becomes unquestionable, insulated, and fused with authority, it stops being inquiry and starts becoming dogma.
Power protects narratives… Real science welcomes scrutiny.
It tests assumptions. It invites debate. It never demands blind faith.
The public conversation has changed. People want transparency, not decrees.
@delbigtree
If science becomes unquestionable, insulated, and fused with authority, it stops being inquiry and starts becoming dogma.
Power protects narratives… Real science welcomes scrutiny.
It tests assumptions. It invites debate. It never demands blind faith.
The public conversation has changed. People want transparency, not decrees.
@delbigtree
❤2
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🧪This one is a MUST SHARE. Del, using visual aids (😉), breaks down the difficult concept of "cell mimicry." This helps us understand why the COVID vaccine may be targeting healthy cells in our body, such as heart cells, for example.
You can share this with your friends for an easy way to understand a complicated medical concept.
@delbigtree
You can share this with your friends for an easy way to understand a complicated medical concept.
@delbigtree
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
💔 A rare ruling from the Vaccine Injury Compensation Program brought long-awaited validation to grieving parents who lost their 11-week-old baby after routine vaccinations.
After years of hearing “SIDS,” the court found evidence of vaccine-induced injury and ruled in the family’s favor, an uncommon but powerful acknowledgment.
Listen to the clip to hear how the DOJ handled the case, and we dare you not to be angry. 😡
@DelBigtree
After years of hearing “SIDS,” the court found evidence of vaccine-induced injury and ruled in the family’s favor, an uncommon but powerful acknowledgment.
Listen to the clip to hear how the DOJ handled the case, and we dare you not to be angry. 😡
@DelBigtree
❤3
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🚨 Bill Gates just dropped the mask on climate hysteria.“Climate is super important... but there’s enough innovation to avoid super bad outcomes.”
Translation: The "climate" narrative was always a fundraising machine. Now he’s pivoting all those billions (built on 50+ years of fear) straight into vaccines and "child survival."
Measles shots over melting ice caps? That’s the trade he’s openly pushing.
This is the reveal.
The same infrastructure that locked down the planet under “save the Earth” is now fully funded to control your body under “save the children.” WHO. UN. Gates. Same players. Same authoritarian endgame. Watch the full breakdown.
@delbigtree
Translation: The "climate" narrative was always a fundraising machine. Now he’s pivoting all those billions (built on 50+ years of fear) straight into vaccines and "child survival."
Measles shots over melting ice caps? That’s the trade he’s openly pushing.
This is the reveal.
The same infrastructure that locked down the planet under “save the Earth” is now fully funded to control your body under “save the children.” WHO. UN. Gates. Same players. Same authoritarian endgame. Watch the full breakdown.
@delbigtree
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥 Russell Brand on Calling, Grace, and Becoming Who You Are
Russell Brand opens up to Del about purpose and the weight of having a public voice. He says he never set out to “save lives” or change the world. He’s simply expressing what he feels he’s been given.
Brand shares that his gifts, like his struggles, were not self-made. Grace, he says, is something granted, not earned.
His work now is about becoming who he truly is, despite the chaos and temptations that once pulled him off course.
In a world full of noise, staying grounded in purpose is hard to think through, but essential.
@delbigtree
Russell Brand opens up to Del about purpose and the weight of having a public voice. He says he never set out to “save lives” or change the world. He’s simply expressing what he feels he’s been given.
Brand shares that his gifts, like his struggles, were not self-made. Grace, he says, is something granted, not earned.
His work now is about becoming who he truly is, despite the chaos and temptations that once pulled him off course.
In a world full of noise, staying grounded in purpose is hard to think through, but essential.
@delbigtree
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥 Russell Brand on Bobby Kennedy’s Integrity
Russell Brand reflects on his time working alongside Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and why he believes Bobby’s character is so rare in modern politics. He says Bobby’s recovery, humility, and willingness to take on powerful industries set him apart in a city driven by corporate interests.
Brand argues that legacy media attacked him not because he lacked substance, but because he threatened the systems they protect.
A leader who knows grief, addiction, duty, and integrity, he says, is exactly what America needs.
@delbigtree
Russell Brand reflects on his time working alongside Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and why he believes Bobby’s character is so rare in modern politics. He says Bobby’s recovery, humility, and willingness to take on powerful industries set him apart in a city driven by corporate interests.
Brand argues that legacy media attacked him not because he lacked substance, but because he threatened the systems they protect.
A leader who knows grief, addiction, duty, and integrity, he says, is exactly what America needs.
@delbigtree
❤2
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🚨Debunking Grok: Hep B Trials Under the Microscope
@AaronSiri walks through the data showing that the two hepatitis B vaccines given to newborns were licensed without a true control group in their clinical trials.
"There are two licensed hepatitis B vaccines. A child on the first day of life will only get one of these two shots. In the clinical trials to license them, there was no control group. There was none."
Siri also explains that the early plasma-derived version, licensed in the 80s and made from the blood of chronic hep B carriers, was only tested in high-risk adults and babies born to infected mothers, and the trial did not validate its safety.
Shocking, unbelievable, but true.
@delbigtree
@AaronSiri walks through the data showing that the two hepatitis B vaccines given to newborns were licensed without a true control group in their clinical trials.
"There are two licensed hepatitis B vaccines. A child on the first day of life will only get one of these two shots. In the clinical trials to license them, there was no control group. There was none."
Siri also explains that the early plasma-derived version, licensed in the 80s and made from the blood of chronic hep B carriers, was only tested in high-risk adults and babies born to infected mothers, and the trial did not validate its safety.
Shocking, unbelievable, but true.
@delbigtree
😐2
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🇺🇸🦃HAPPY THANKSGIVING! 🦃🇺🇸
From our family to yours, the team at "The HighWire" wishes you a very happy Thanksgiving holiday.
@delbigtree
From our family to yours, the team at "The HighWire" wishes you a very happy Thanksgiving holiday.
@delbigtree
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🚨Debunking Grok: Polio Vaccine Trials You’ve Never Been Shown
Aaron Siri breaks down the licensing data for today’s polio vaccine, IPOL. It was licensed in 1990, and in its clinical trial, safety was only reviewed for three days after injection.
THREE. DAYS.
There was no control group.
This is not the Salk or Sabin vaccine most people think of. This version uses Vero cells, monkey kidney cells modified to replicate indefinitely.
Del notes that although some claim the original IPV was tested against a saline placebo, the modern IPOL vaccine was never tested against that earlier product.
When pressed on whether the Salk vaccine truly had a saline placebo, Siri is clear. It did not.
The control injection contained formalin, antibiotics, dye, and other ingredients. By any definition, that is not an inert placebo.
@delbigtree
Aaron Siri breaks down the licensing data for today’s polio vaccine, IPOL. It was licensed in 1990, and in its clinical trial, safety was only reviewed for three days after injection.
THREE. DAYS.
There was no control group.
This is not the Salk or Sabin vaccine most people think of. This version uses Vero cells, monkey kidney cells modified to replicate indefinitely.
Del notes that although some claim the original IPV was tested against a saline placebo, the modern IPOL vaccine was never tested against that earlier product.
When pressed on whether the Salk vaccine truly had a saline placebo, Siri is clear. It did not.
The control injection contained formalin, antibiotics, dye, and other ingredients. By any definition, that is not an inert placebo.
@delbigtree
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
There is rarely a real risk/benefit analysis done when it comes to vaccines. Dr. Pompa and @delbigtree had a great discussion about what the number really are, and what the stats are for these diseases.
In some cases, infection with measles and mumps actually LOWERS your risk of other ailments later in life.
@delbigtree
In some cases, infection with measles and mumps actually LOWERS your risk of other ailments later in life.
@delbigtree
❤1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Physicians for Informed Consent has released a new resource compiling CDC-reported incidence data on vaccine-targeted diseases - every documented case, spanning the 20th century, before the vaccine era.
Dr. Sears has been practicing for 28 years and states he has never encountered a single severe case of these illnesses in his career.
Patients routinely ask about the quantifiable risk of not vaccinating. This book provides it: the actual numbers, drawn directly from historical surveillance records.
The rates are strikingly low.
@delbigtree
Dr. Sears has been practicing for 28 years and states he has never encountered a single severe case of these illnesses in his career.
Patients routinely ask about the quantifiable risk of not vaccinating. This book provides it: the actual numbers, drawn directly from historical surveillance records.
The rates are strikingly low.
@delbigtree
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
When legacy media accidentally says the quiet part out loud…
Whoopi Goldberg argues that the government has no business telling families what to do, that parents should decide with their doctor, and that medical choices belong at home, not in Washington.
Del’s reaction says it all:
“Whoopi, that’s exactly what Robert Kennedy just did. He just said the government shouldn’t be telling you what to do with this vaccine, especially if you are negative. As a mother, you should have the right to choose and have the conversation with your doctor.”
The irony is impossible to miss.
When the message aligns with establishment power, it’s framed as responsible. When it challenges that power, it’s treated as dangerous.
So the real question isn’t whether families should have medical autonomy.
It’s who is allowed to say it out loud.
@delbigtree
Whoopi Goldberg argues that the government has no business telling families what to do, that parents should decide with their doctor, and that medical choices belong at home, not in Washington.
Del’s reaction says it all:
“Whoopi, that’s exactly what Robert Kennedy just did. He just said the government shouldn’t be telling you what to do with this vaccine, especially if you are negative. As a mother, you should have the right to choose and have the conversation with your doctor.”
The irony is impossible to miss.
When the message aligns with establishment power, it’s framed as responsible. When it challenges that power, it’s treated as dangerous.
So the real question isn’t whether families should have medical autonomy.
It’s who is allowed to say it out loud.
@delbigtree
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
There is not a single study in the entire world - not from a single health department in any nation - that has compared vaccinated kids to unvaccinated kids and shown that the vaccinated are the ones who have better health outcomes. They will never admit they were wrong, because that would mean accepting liability for trillions of dollars in damages.
@delbigtree
@delbigtree
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
They kicked Dr. Drew off of tiktok while we were talking. There’s something deeply revealing happening right now, and if you’re paying attention, you can feel it.
We’re finally starting to hear conversations that were off-limits for decades. Actual conversations.
And that matters because when you silence discussion, you don’t eliminate harm. You just abandon the people living with it.
Let me be clear about something. Rare injuries exist. They’re real. And when they happen, whether from a disease, a medication, or a medical intervention, they’re devastating. No one disputes that.
But here’s the question no one in authority seems willing to answer:
Why is it acceptable to talk about rare injuries in every medical context except vaccines?
Why is empathy allowed everywhere except here?
If a child is injured by a rare disease complication, we speak openly. We fund research. We support families. But when that injury follows a vaccine, suddenly the rules change. Suddenly you’re not allowed to ask questions. Suddenly the injury becomes invisible. Suddenly the parent becomes the problem.
For those suffering vaccine injury, it’s not political. It’s their daily reality. And pretending those people don’t exist doesn’t make vaccines safer, but it sure does make medicine weaker.
What I’m encouraging people to do now is simple, but powerful: trust your instincts again. Ask yourself whether you’re getting a full, well-rounded picture or whether someone has decided certain information is too dangerous for you to hear.
Because the truth is real science welcomes debate. Real science isn’t afraid of questions. And real public health doesn’t require censorship to survive.
Which brings me to the most telling part of all this.
We had a conversation like this measured, calm, balanced, on a show. And in the middle of it, TikTok shut down the stream and issued a strike for “community guideline violations.” Just for a discussion.
That’s why these debates matter. That’s why I’m encouraged. Because even when they try to shut it down, the conversation keeps happening. And every time it does, a little more light gets in.
@delbigtree
We’re finally starting to hear conversations that were off-limits for decades. Actual conversations.
And that matters because when you silence discussion, you don’t eliminate harm. You just abandon the people living with it.
Let me be clear about something. Rare injuries exist. They’re real. And when they happen, whether from a disease, a medication, or a medical intervention, they’re devastating. No one disputes that.
But here’s the question no one in authority seems willing to answer:
Why is it acceptable to talk about rare injuries in every medical context except vaccines?
Why is empathy allowed everywhere except here?
If a child is injured by a rare disease complication, we speak openly. We fund research. We support families. But when that injury follows a vaccine, suddenly the rules change. Suddenly you’re not allowed to ask questions. Suddenly the injury becomes invisible. Suddenly the parent becomes the problem.
For those suffering vaccine injury, it’s not political. It’s their daily reality. And pretending those people don’t exist doesn’t make vaccines safer, but it sure does make medicine weaker.
What I’m encouraging people to do now is simple, but powerful: trust your instincts again. Ask yourself whether you’re getting a full, well-rounded picture or whether someone has decided certain information is too dangerous for you to hear.
Because the truth is real science welcomes debate. Real science isn’t afraid of questions. And real public health doesn’t require censorship to survive.
Which brings me to the most telling part of all this.
We had a conversation like this measured, calm, balanced, on a show. And in the middle of it, TikTok shut down the stream and issued a strike for “community guideline violations.” Just for a discussion.
That’s why these debates matter. That’s why I’m encouraged. Because even when they try to shut it down, the conversation keeps happening. And every time it does, a little more light gets in.
@delbigtree
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
They keep telling you the science is settled. Vut settled on what, exactly? One vaccine? Two? Ten at once? Seventy-two over childhood? There isn’t a single study asking whether piling them together is safe.
Meanwhile, our kids get more vaccines and more drugs than any other nation… and they’re also the sickest. At some point, you have to stop trusting slogans and start asking real questions.
@delbigtree
Meanwhile, our kids get more vaccines and more drugs than any other nation… and they’re also the sickest. At some point, you have to stop trusting slogans and start asking real questions.
@delbigtree
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
If you want to know the truth about vaccines, don’t take my word for it. Don’t take the government’s word for it. Read what the manufacturers themselves submitted.
Start with your pediatrician. Ask them to hand you the vaccine insert. Just ask.
If they say, “Of course! Let’s read it together,” you’ve found a rare doctor who respects you and your child. Hold on to them.
But if they bristle. If they question why you’re asking. If they try to bully you or shame you that’s your sign. You’re in the wrong office with someone who doesn’t value informed consent.
Now here’s how to do it yourself.
Google “FDA licensed vaccines.”
At the same time, pull up the CDC childhood vaccine scheduleso you know what’s being recommended. Click each vaccine then open the package insert. That’s the warning label that arrives with the product.
Then go straight to Section 6.1.
That’s the safety trial. That’s the best evidence they relied on to inject this product into your child.
Want your mind blown? Start with Recombivax HB, the hepatitis B vaccine they were giving on day one of life. Read that they considered a study of 147 children, followed for five days, with no placebo group, sufficient to declare it safe and then mandated it for every newborn in America. In some cases, they’ll even threaten Child Protective Services if you say no.
@delbigtree
Start with your pediatrician. Ask them to hand you the vaccine insert. Just ask.
If they say, “Of course! Let’s read it together,” you’ve found a rare doctor who respects you and your child. Hold on to them.
But if they bristle. If they question why you’re asking. If they try to bully you or shame you that’s your sign. You’re in the wrong office with someone who doesn’t value informed consent.
Now here’s how to do it yourself.
Google “FDA licensed vaccines.”
At the same time, pull up the CDC childhood vaccine scheduleso you know what’s being recommended. Click each vaccine then open the package insert. That’s the warning label that arrives with the product.
Then go straight to Section 6.1.
That’s the safety trial. That’s the best evidence they relied on to inject this product into your child.
Want your mind blown? Start with Recombivax HB, the hepatitis B vaccine they were giving on day one of life. Read that they considered a study of 147 children, followed for five days, with no placebo group, sufficient to declare it safe and then mandated it for every newborn in America. In some cases, they’ll even threaten Child Protective Services if you say no.
@delbigtree
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Pay close attention when you hear the phrase “there is no evidence that vaccines cause harm” or “there is no evidence that vaccines cause autism.”
Because what that statement really means is something far more disturbing.
It means there is no evidence at all.
No real science proving they don’t.
I know this because we went looking for it. We didn’t speculate. We didn’t guess. We sued the CDC. We said, “Show us the studies.” Not opinions. Not press releases. The actual trials you rely on to say vaccines do not cause autism.
We made it simple.
Just the first six vaccines given in the first six months of life.
Hepatitis B. DTaP. Polio. The basics.
Send us the studies.
What did they send back?
Twenty studies that didn’t include any of those vaccines.
Not one.
So let’s just be clear: there is no science showing that hepatitis B, DTaP, or polio vaccines do not cause autism. Period. That science does not exist.
What they did send were a handful of heavily manipulated studies focused almost entirely on the MMR vaccine which is the vaccine at the center of Vaxxed. And even there, the data is riddled with assumptions, exclusions, and statistical gymnastics designed to protect a conclusion that was decided in advance.
This entire narrative that vaccines are conclusively proven safe when it comes to autism is built on assumptions, wishful thinking, and forceful propaganda. Not on rigorous science.
And that becomes a very serious problem when injuries are no longer rare, when chronic illness is exploding, and when parents are watching their children suffer while being told, “There’s no evidence.”
No...there’s just no evidence either way.
Pretending that equals safety is not science.
@delbigtree
Because what that statement really means is something far more disturbing.
It means there is no evidence at all.
No real science proving they don’t.
I know this because we went looking for it. We didn’t speculate. We didn’t guess. We sued the CDC. We said, “Show us the studies.” Not opinions. Not press releases. The actual trials you rely on to say vaccines do not cause autism.
We made it simple.
Just the first six vaccines given in the first six months of life.
Hepatitis B. DTaP. Polio. The basics.
Send us the studies.
What did they send back?
Twenty studies that didn’t include any of those vaccines.
Not one.
So let’s just be clear: there is no science showing that hepatitis B, DTaP, or polio vaccines do not cause autism. Period. That science does not exist.
What they did send were a handful of heavily manipulated studies focused almost entirely on the MMR vaccine which is the vaccine at the center of Vaxxed. And even there, the data is riddled with assumptions, exclusions, and statistical gymnastics designed to protect a conclusion that was decided in advance.
This entire narrative that vaccines are conclusively proven safe when it comes to autism is built on assumptions, wishful thinking, and forceful propaganda. Not on rigorous science.
And that becomes a very serious problem when injuries are no longer rare, when chronic illness is exploding, and when parents are watching their children suffer while being told, “There’s no evidence.”
No...there’s just no evidence either way.
Pretending that equals safety is not science.
@delbigtree
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Here’s a simple question every parent should feel comfortable asking when they visit their doctor: “Can I see the vaccine insert?”
If your pediatrician says, “I'm so glad you asked! Let’s read it together,” hold on to them. That’s a doctor who respects informed consent.
If you are met with defensiveness, attitude, or pressure that should tell you everything you need to know.
You don’t need special access to do your own homework. You can find every FDA-licensed vaccine insert yourself:
• Look up the CDC recommended childhood schedule
• Click each vaccine listed
• Open the package insert (the official warning label)
• Go straight to Section 6.1. You will find the safety data the approval relied on
That’s where you’ll see:
1⃣ The number of children studied
2⃣ How long they were monitored
3⃣ Whether there was a placebo group
4⃣ And what they thought “safe enough” meant
Start with Recombivax HB, the hepatitis B vaccine, which has historically been given on day one of life. Read the safety section. Then ask yourself if that’s the standard you’re comfortable with.
You owe it to yourself (and to your child) to read what you’re being asked to sign off on.
@delbigtree
If your pediatrician says, “I'm so glad you asked! Let’s read it together,” hold on to them. That’s a doctor who respects informed consent.
If you are met with defensiveness, attitude, or pressure that should tell you everything you need to know.
You don’t need special access to do your own homework. You can find every FDA-licensed vaccine insert yourself:
• Look up the CDC recommended childhood schedule
• Click each vaccine listed
• Open the package insert (the official warning label)
• Go straight to Section 6.1. You will find the safety data the approval relied on
That’s where you’ll see:
1⃣ The number of children studied
2⃣ How long they were monitored
3⃣ Whether there was a placebo group
4⃣ And what they thought “safe enough” meant
Start with Recombivax HB, the hepatitis B vaccine, which has historically been given on day one of life. Read the safety section. Then ask yourself if that’s the standard you’re comfortable with.
You owe it to yourself (and to your child) to read what you’re being asked to sign off on.
@delbigtree
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Dr. Peter Hotez was caught red handed… gaslighting families that have had pediatricians kick them out of their practices or worse, had protective services called on them for wanting to opt out of the CDC recommendations. Peter Hotez says that in Dr’s offices, “there was never coercion.” We know this has been happening for years, but even CBS news reported this was happening as far back as 2012… a survey by the American Journal of Preventative Medicine showed that 25% of pediatricians have fired patients for refusing vaccines. Sounds like coercion to me… who’s gaslighting now?
Nevermind the coercion that goes on at schools in states like CA or NY where your child cannot attend unless you follow the recommendations exactly.
If we want to have real conversations around the changes to the schedule, we have to start with honesty and transparency- it’s what we’ve been asking for since day one of this movement.
Come on, Peter. Do better.
@delbigtree
Nevermind the coercion that goes on at schools in states like CA or NY where your child cannot attend unless you follow the recommendations exactly.
If we want to have real conversations around the changes to the schedule, we have to start with honesty and transparency- it’s what we’ve been asking for since day one of this movement.
Come on, Peter. Do better.
@delbigtree