On the philosophical front: we might want to consider a structure, W, whose domain is the set of all living wombats. In order to work out which sentences are true in W using Robinson’s own proposal, we would have to treat each wombat as a name for itself, and so imagine a language whose syntactic parts are live wombats. This stretches the ordinary notion of a language to breaking point.
Евгения Золина (очень крутого логика из нашей лаборатории) арестовали по делу о педофилии
⚡1
и только Школа философии Уханьского университета шлет по 2 письма в день с анонсами
👍1
If you have no interest to receive academic infor about lecture series on logic and foundations of mathematics, and logic and philosophy, just let us know, and we could delete your name for our list.
Вообще нет ничего столь нелепого в словах или в делах, создателями чего не были бы философы.
надо не забыть дописать код программы по статье про социальное влияние к НИСу в субботу
On this point I have to register disagreement: I want not only to be a heretic, but also to insist that the heresy matters. I have argued, and continue to believe, that what I have called "the linguistic picture"—the family of doctrines, metaphors and strategies that assume, in one way or another, the priority of linguistic over mental representation—has had a profound influence on our conception of intentionality, a distorting influence that has impeded a clear understanding not only of thought, but also of speech.