🧬 Proto Turk Proxy: Mongolia_EIA_SlabGrave_1 DNA Breakdown 🧬

This ancient DNA sample helps us understand East Eurasian input in Turkic people.

📊 qpAdm Results: 📊

• 95.7% Ancient Northern East Asians
• 2.6% Eastern European Hunter Gatherer
• 1.7% Ancient Northern Eurasian

🤔 Not 100% Mongoloid 🤔

This shows they were 95.7% Mongoloid and 4.3% Caucasoid, debunking the myth of a 100% Mongoloid ancestry.

🤝 Genetic Similarity 🤝

This sample is genetically close to Khamnegan ethnicity.

🖼️ Hypothetical Reconstruction 🖼️ attached

@illyrianometer

Admixture among samples found in Croatia during Medieval times
@illyrianometer

🌾🧬🌍 West Byzantine Sample DNA Breakdown! 🧬🌍🌾

According to qpAdm, the amazing genetic makeup of this sample reveals its fascinating origins! Let's dive into the percentages and explore the connections! 🧬🔍

🌿 Anatolian Neolithic Farmer: 55.3% 🌾
Proto Indo-European: 19% 🗺️
🌳 Natufian Hunter Gatherer: 10% 🏹
🌾 Iran Neolithic Farmer: 8.3% 🌄
🏞️ Caucasus Hunter Gatherer: 7.4% ⛰️

Interestingly, this incredible sample shares a stronger genetic bond with the enchanting Dodecanese Greeks! 🇬🇷💫 The similarities are truly captivating! 😮✨



🔬🔍🔮 #WestByzantineSample #DNAOrigins #DodecaneseGreeks #AncientConnections #JoinTheJourney

@illyrianometer

🧬 Tatar_Kazan G25 DNA Breakdown 🧬

(couldn't use qpAdm due to overlapping issue between Uralic and Turkic)

📊 Details: 📊
• 36% Slavic
• 26.8% Turkic Raider
• 22.8% Uralic mixed Proxy
• 12% West Caucasus
• 2.4% Finno Ugric

🤝 Genetic Similarity 🤝

Kazan Tatars are genetically closer to Mishar Tatars.

Source for using western caucasus:-https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28064314/

@illyrianometer

Luxembourg_Loschbour.DG
Loschbour man is considered that western hunter gatherer which participated in dna of europeans

Research claims he was white man(european) with tanning abilities

Source:- https://reich.hms.harvard.edu/sites/reich.hms.harvard.edu/files/inline-files/2019_Brace_NatureEcologyEvolution_Supplement.pdf

@illyrianometer

Russian_Smolensk region g25 details
Smolensk
Smolensk is a city and the administrative center of Smolensk Oblast, Russia, located on the Dnieper River, 360 kilometers (220 mi) west-southwest of Moscow

Dna details
97.7% slavic
1% uralic
1.3% west Caucasus related

Genetically closer to modern Belarusians

Россия_Смоленская область g25 подробнее Смоленск Смоленск — город и административный центр Смоленской области России, расположенный на реке Днепр, в 360 километрах (220 миль) к западу-юго-западу от Москвы.
Детали ДНК
97,7% славянские
1% урал
1,3% связаны с Западным Кавказом

Генетически близки к современным Белорусам

@illyrianometer

Question asked by our subscriber what will happen if Kazakh and South Italian mix
It will be somehow close to tatars of crimea

@illyrianometer

What will happen if an italian from apulia mix with georgian
Offspring will be close to central Anatolian greeks
@illyrianometer

Western_Hunter_Gatherers 🕵️‍♀️ were proto-Europeans 🇪🇺, essentially the original native Europeans. They formed when the Epigravettian people 🏹 replaced the Magdalenian people 🦣 in Europe. Both the Epigravettian and Magdalenian cultures were European cultures connected to the Paleolithic period 🪨.

Western_Hunter_Gatherer DNA, according to qpAdm, was:

91.7% Epigravettian 🏹
8.3% Magdalenian 🦣

These Western_Hunter_Gatherers are genetically similar to people from the Baltic region 🌊.

After the Bølling/Allerød warming interstadial (14,000 years ago), the Goyet Q2 cluster was replaced by the Villabruna cluster in central Europe. The Villabruna cluster gets its name from the oldest Epigravettian-associated individual found in northern Italy 🇮🇹.

Source:-https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10089921

@illyrianometer

3,000-Year-Old Lost Anatolian language ‘Kalašma’ deciphered

In 2023 excavation site at the foot of Ambarlikaya in Boğazköy-Hattusha in Turkey, a cuneiform tablet with a previously unknown Indo-European language was discovered. The newly-discovered language, Kalašma, belongs to the Anatolian-Indo-European languages family.

@illyrianometer

Neolithic Europe had the earliest wheel, earliest gold metallurgy, earliest bronze metallurgy, earliest evidence of copper smelting, and possibly the earliest writing.

@illyrianometer

Tajik average qpAdm bronze age model

43.1% Proto indo Iranian
40.4% Bmac pre central asian
10.5% east eurasian related
5.9% tarim mummies related

@illyrianometer

Uzbek bronze age qpAdm breakdown

47.2% East eurasian proxy
31.8% proto indo iranian
21% Bmac central asian native

Result verified with result simulation
@illyrianometer

Staredown" between a Saka and a Turkic from Zhetysu, Kazakhstan.
@illyrianometer

Facial reconstruction of a man from Bronze Age Norway.

@illyrianometer

Serbian qpAdm dna details:-
39.4% Proto indo european
49.5% Anatolian Neolithic Farmer
8.1% Western_Hunter_Gatherer
3% iran Neolithic
@illyrianometer

Before starting more stuff
We already discussed some bmacs(pre aryan central asians) and indus valley folks(pre aryan south asians) interacted with each other

There is one interesting sample
It is mix of indus and bmac

This sample is 82.8% indus and 17.2% bmac

Based on this i assume there might be chance for us to explain where from small amount of bmac comes in south asians .

@illyrianometer

Netherlands_Groningen_Saxon_Medieval 🇳🇱🧬, according to qpAdm, has this DNA breakdown:

50.8% Proto-Indo-European 🏹
36.4% Anatolian Neolithic Farmer 🌾
12.8% Western_Hunter_Gatherer 🚶‍♀️

This sample is genetically similar to modern Danish people 🇩🇰.

@illyrianometer

Tajikistan Bronze Age Dashty Kozy , according to qpAdm, has this DNA breakdown:

76.2% Proto-Indo-European 🏹
20.1% Anatolian Neolithic Farmer 🌾
3.7% Western_Hunter_Gatherer 🚶‍♀️

This sample is closer to modern Mordovian, Moksha, Swedish, Irish, etc. 🌎 people.

The chart shows genetic distance with lower numbers meaning closer relationships.

This proves that the original Aryans were literally of European stock. 🇪🇺 They have all Europid components and they were racially similar to europeans. ⚪️

@illyrianometer