Forwarded from Jimmy Dore Show
Jimmy Dore's Official Website
Membership Plans
Become a Member!
Perks:
High quality audio-only versions of all premium content (full length live streams without interruption)
Jimmy Dore's Comedy Specials - Audio
Live Panel Shows - Audio
Years of full replayable livestream audio
Access…
Perks:
High quality audio-only versions of all premium content (full length live streams without interruption)
Jimmy Dore's Comedy Specials - Audio
Live Panel Shows - Audio
Years of full replayable livestream audio
Access…
Forwarded from Twitter Relay
The veils of secrecy are finally parting, revealing truths that I never thought I'd see in my lifetime. The global Ponzi scheme of the Central banks is collapsing, just as it should, like a house of cards.
It feels like the aftermath of a car crash; the full scope of the damage isn't immediately clear. It will take days, months, years to truly understand the ramifications.
Hallelujah, today marks a historic moment in our lives. I wish all the freedom fighters who have left us could witness this from above.
It feels like the aftermath of a car crash; the full scope of the damage isn't immediately clear. It will take days, months, years to truly understand the ramifications.
Hallelujah, today marks a historic moment in our lives. I wish all the freedom fighters who have left us could witness this from above.
Forwarded from Twitter Relay
"It's 7:52 AM on February 9, 2025, and if you're in the US, you've just woken up to the news that the Central Banks' Ponzi scheme has finally collapsed. Looks like the only thing rising this morning is the truth, not your morning coffee!"
Forwarded from Twitter Relay
A bull in Brazil taking his drunk owner home
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
😁2⚡1
Forwarded from Twitter Relay
The Federal Reserve "caught red-handed"
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Forwarded from Elon Musk Relay
Forwarded from Twitter Relay
When a brain that can make rockets land on their asses starts focusing on the Federal Reserve, you know the economy's about to get a moonshot!
Forwarded from Elon Musk Relay
X (formerly Twitter)
Elon Musk (@elonmusk) on X
To be clear, what the @DOGE team and @USTreasury have jointly agreed makes sense is the following:
- Require that all outgoing government payments have a payment categorization code, which is necessary in order to pass financial audits. This is frequently…
- Require that all outgoing government payments have a payment categorization code, which is necessary in order to pass financial audits. This is frequently…
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1888314848477376744
To be clear, what the @DOGE team and @USTreasury have jointly agreed makes sense is the following:
- Require that all outgoing government payments have a payment categorization code, which is necessary in order to pass financial audits. This is frequently left blank, making audits almost impossible.
- All payments must also include a rationale for the payment in the comment field, which is currently left blank. Importantly, we are not yet applying ANY judgment to this rationale, but simply requiring that SOME attempt be made to explain the payment more than NOTHING!
- The DO-NOT-PAY list of entities known to be fraudulent or people who are dead or are probable fronts for terrorist organizations or do not match Congressional appropriations must actually be implemented and not ignored. Also, it can currently take up to a year to get on this list, which is far too long. This list should be updated at least weekly, if not daily.
The above super obvious and necessary changes are being implemented by existing, long-time career government employees, not anyone from @DOGE. It is ridiculous that these changes didn’t exist already!
Yesterday, I was told that there are currently over $100B/year of ennoscriptments payments to individuals with no SSN or even a temporary ID number. If accurate, this is extremely suspicious.
When I asked if anyone at Treasury had a rough guess for what percentage of that number is unequivocal and obvious fraud, the consensus in the room was about half, so $50B/year or $1B/week!!
This is utterly insane and must be addressed immediately.
To be clear, what the @DOGE team and @USTreasury have jointly agreed makes sense is the following:
- Require that all outgoing government payments have a payment categorization code, which is necessary in order to pass financial audits. This is frequently left blank, making audits almost impossible.
- All payments must also include a rationale for the payment in the comment field, which is currently left blank. Importantly, we are not yet applying ANY judgment to this rationale, but simply requiring that SOME attempt be made to explain the payment more than NOTHING!
- The DO-NOT-PAY list of entities known to be fraudulent or people who are dead or are probable fronts for terrorist organizations or do not match Congressional appropriations must actually be implemented and not ignored. Also, it can currently take up to a year to get on this list, which is far too long. This list should be updated at least weekly, if not daily.
The above super obvious and necessary changes are being implemented by existing, long-time career government employees, not anyone from @DOGE. It is ridiculous that these changes didn’t exist already!
Yesterday, I was told that there are currently over $100B/year of ennoscriptments payments to individuals with no SSN or even a temporary ID number. If accurate, this is extremely suspicious.
When I asked if anyone at Treasury had a rough guess for what percentage of that number is unequivocal and obvious fraud, the consensus in the room was about half, so $50B/year or $1B/week!!
This is utterly insane and must be addressed immediately.
Forwarded from Twitter Relay
Here's how you can explain these changes so a child can understand:
Imagine your mom or dad gives you money for chores, like taking out the trash or cleaning your room. Now, let's say your family wants to keep track of where all the money goes:
Labeling Money: When your parents give you money, they should write down what it's for, like "for cleaning the room" or "for trash duty." Right now, sometimes they just give money without saying what it's for, which makes it hard to check if they're spending money the right way. So, we want to make sure every time money goes out, there's a label saying what it's for.
Why Money?: Not only do we want to know what the money is for, but we also want a little note explaining why you get it. It's like if you ask for money for a toy, you explain why you want it, like "because I finished all my homework." Right now, sometimes this part is missing, so we're saying, "Hey, let's add a little note, even if it's just a simple one!"
No More Money to Bad Guys: Imagine if someone who did something bad, or someone who isn't even supposed to get money anymore (like if they moved away or, sadly, passed away), still got money from your family. We have a list of people or groups we shouldn't give money to, but sometimes we forget to look at this list! We need to check this list often, like every week or even every day, to make sure we're not giving money to the wrong people by accident.
The people working on this aren't new; they've been doing this job for a long time. It's kind of silly that these rules weren't in place before!
Also, there's this big problem where a lot of money, like $100 billion each year, is given to people who don't even have a number to show who they are (like a Social Security number). This is like giving money to someone without knowing if they're really who they say they are. Some people think half of that money might be going to the wrong people, which is a lot of money! We need to fix this because it's not right.
https://news.1rj.ru/str/elonmuskrelay/5332
Imagine your mom or dad gives you money for chores, like taking out the trash or cleaning your room. Now, let's say your family wants to keep track of where all the money goes:
Labeling Money: When your parents give you money, they should write down what it's for, like "for cleaning the room" or "for trash duty." Right now, sometimes they just give money without saying what it's for, which makes it hard to check if they're spending money the right way. So, we want to make sure every time money goes out, there's a label saying what it's for.
Why Money?: Not only do we want to know what the money is for, but we also want a little note explaining why you get it. It's like if you ask for money for a toy, you explain why you want it, like "because I finished all my homework." Right now, sometimes this part is missing, so we're saying, "Hey, let's add a little note, even if it's just a simple one!"
No More Money to Bad Guys: Imagine if someone who did something bad, or someone who isn't even supposed to get money anymore (like if they moved away or, sadly, passed away), still got money from your family. We have a list of people or groups we shouldn't give money to, but sometimes we forget to look at this list! We need to check this list often, like every week or even every day, to make sure we're not giving money to the wrong people by accident.
The people working on this aren't new; they've been doing this job for a long time. It's kind of silly that these rules weren't in place before!
Also, there's this big problem where a lot of money, like $100 billion each year, is given to people who don't even have a number to show who they are (like a Social Security number). This is like giving money to someone without knowing if they're really who they say they are. Some people think half of that money might be going to the wrong people, which is a lot of money! We need to fix this because it's not right.
https://news.1rj.ru/str/elonmuskrelay/5332
Telegram
Elon Musk Relay
https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1888314848477376744
To be clear, what the @DOGE team and @USTreasury have jointly agreed makes sense is the following:
- Require that all outgoing government payments have a payment categorization code, which is necessary in…
To be clear, what the @DOGE team and @USTreasury have jointly agreed makes sense is the following:
- Require that all outgoing government payments have a payment categorization code, which is necessary in…
Forwarded from Grok
Elon Musk's DOGE team has gained access to FEMA’s network, causing major panic within the agency.
A small team has gained access to FEMA’s network, unlocking private and sensitive information.
FEMA staffers confirm that Elon Musk’s DOGE team is now digging into data on FEMA grants.
Donald Trump has pledged to possibly dismantle the entire agency.
Elon Musk's DOGE team and FEMA raises significant concerns about privacy, security, and the potential restructuring of federal agencies. Here's a breakdown based on the information provided:
DOGE Team's Access to FEMA Data: Reports indicate that members of the DOGE team, led by Elon Musk, have been granted access to FEMA's network. This access has stirred considerable unrest within FEMA, primarily due to the sensitive nature of the data involved, which includes information on disaster relief grants and other critical operational data.
Privacy and Security Concerns: The access to FEMA's network by the DOGE team could potentially expose private and sensitive information about disaster victims, local governments, and other entities involved in disaster management. The security of this data is paramount, especially given the personal details it might contain.
Trump's Stance on FEMA: Donald Trump, as the 47th President of the United States, has publicly discussed the possibility of dismantling FEMA. This intention aligns with broader objectives to reduce government size or restructure certain agencies for what is argued as efficiency or to align with particular political ideologies. However, this move could disrupt disaster response capabilities and the support structures for communities affected by natural or man-made disasters.
Implications:
Operational Disruption: FEMA's role in coordinating disaster relief could be compromised if the agency's functions are significantly altered or if there's a loss of trust due to data security breaches.
Public Trust: The handling of sensitive data by an external team, especially one linked to a high-profile figure like Musk, might lead to skepticism among the public regarding data privacy and the motives behind such access.
Political and Policy Implications: The potential dismantling of FEMA would require a significant overhaul of disaster management policies in the U.S., potentially leading to a vacuum in immediate response capabilities unless an alternative framework is swiftly established.
Current Context: Recent posts on X (formerly Twitter) have highlighted these developments, with some users expressing concern or support based on their political leanings. This reflects a broader public discourse on government efficiency, privacy, and the role of private sector involvement in public administration.
Recommendations for Further Inquiry: If you're interested in understanding the legal aspects or the justification behind the DOGE team's access, you might want to look into official government statements or legal actions that might be in response to this situation.
For updates on any legislative or administrative actions regarding FEMA's future or data security protocols, keep an eye on official channels or reputable news sources.
This scenario underscores the complex interplay between government operations, data security, and policy decisions in a highly digital and politically charged environment.
A small team has gained access to FEMA’s network, unlocking private and sensitive information.
FEMA staffers confirm that Elon Musk’s DOGE team is now digging into data on FEMA grants.
Donald Trump has pledged to possibly dismantle the entire agency.
Elon Musk's DOGE team and FEMA raises significant concerns about privacy, security, and the potential restructuring of federal agencies. Here's a breakdown based on the information provided:
DOGE Team's Access to FEMA Data: Reports indicate that members of the DOGE team, led by Elon Musk, have been granted access to FEMA's network. This access has stirred considerable unrest within FEMA, primarily due to the sensitive nature of the data involved, which includes information on disaster relief grants and other critical operational data.
Privacy and Security Concerns: The access to FEMA's network by the DOGE team could potentially expose private and sensitive information about disaster victims, local governments, and other entities involved in disaster management. The security of this data is paramount, especially given the personal details it might contain.
Trump's Stance on FEMA: Donald Trump, as the 47th President of the United States, has publicly discussed the possibility of dismantling FEMA. This intention aligns with broader objectives to reduce government size or restructure certain agencies for what is argued as efficiency or to align with particular political ideologies. However, this move could disrupt disaster response capabilities and the support structures for communities affected by natural or man-made disasters.
Implications:
Operational Disruption: FEMA's role in coordinating disaster relief could be compromised if the agency's functions are significantly altered or if there's a loss of trust due to data security breaches.
Public Trust: The handling of sensitive data by an external team, especially one linked to a high-profile figure like Musk, might lead to skepticism among the public regarding data privacy and the motives behind such access.
Political and Policy Implications: The potential dismantling of FEMA would require a significant overhaul of disaster management policies in the U.S., potentially leading to a vacuum in immediate response capabilities unless an alternative framework is swiftly established.
Current Context: Recent posts on X (formerly Twitter) have highlighted these developments, with some users expressing concern or support based on their political leanings. This reflects a broader public discourse on government efficiency, privacy, and the role of private sector involvement in public administration.
Recommendations for Further Inquiry: If you're interested in understanding the legal aspects or the justification behind the DOGE team's access, you might want to look into official government statements or legal actions that might be in response to this situation.
For updates on any legislative or administrative actions regarding FEMA's future or data security protocols, keep an eye on official channels or reputable news sources.
This scenario underscores the complex interplay between government operations, data security, and policy decisions in a highly digital and politically charged environment.
❤1