This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
It's crazy how Rhodesia went from looking like Europe to a sh&t hole when it became Zimbabwe.
Rhodesia showed the world what Africa could be, Zimbabwe showed it what it is.
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
Rhodesia showed the world what Africa could be, Zimbabwe showed it what it is.
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
💯7
A woman’s role in the home can easily be replaced by a maid or a nanny, and most times they will do it even better. That is why many women are very picky about their maids, especially regarding their looks and femininity, because they know
those maids can easily replace them if they do a better job. This is also why most wives are often abusive or
hostile toward their maids. But your role as a man cannot be replaced.
No woman can hire someone to pay the bills, protect the house, or provide for the family until the day she dies. Maids do not pay alimony, child support, or wake up in the middle of the night to check who is breaking into the house.
A man’s role is far more valuable, and that is why women often exaggerate their contribution at home so that you do not look down on them. Notice how they only call cooking and cleaning “slavery” when they have a husband, but never when they are single mothers or divorcees doing the same thing alone.
This is why women push for marriage more, and it is also why they tend to live longer, because marriage benefits them more.
Men need to start demanding more and stop being foolish. Women need men more than men need women. They need your money, your attention, and your love. Without those three things, they become bitter, turn into feminists, and start trying to sabotage other women’s relationships and marriages both online and offline.
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
those maids can easily replace them if they do a better job. This is also why most wives are often abusive or
hostile toward their maids. But your role as a man cannot be replaced.
No woman can hire someone to pay the bills, protect the house, or provide for the family until the day she dies. Maids do not pay alimony, child support, or wake up in the middle of the night to check who is breaking into the house.
A man’s role is far more valuable, and that is why women often exaggerate their contribution at home so that you do not look down on them. Notice how they only call cooking and cleaning “slavery” when they have a husband, but never when they are single mothers or divorcees doing the same thing alone.
This is why women push for marriage more, and it is also why they tend to live longer, because marriage benefits them more.
Men need to start demanding more and stop being foolish. Women need men more than men need women. They need your money, your attention, and your love. Without those three things, they become bitter, turn into feminists, and start trying to sabotage other women’s relationships and marriages both online and offline.
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
💯9✍1😐1
Married women are often less happy than married men because marriage is the only place where they’re treated like adults with real responsibility, and women don’t like it
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
💯8💔1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Ali’s Wan 2.2 lets you stream without showing your face.
It maps your voice and motion onto another face with just one clip and one photo.
You can literally stream without revealing who you are.
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
It maps your voice and motion onto another face with just one clip and one photo.
You can literally stream without revealing who you are.
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
❤🔥2👀1
German media goes full r*tard!
1) Drag queen was busted with child porn!
2) People call that out
3) Spiegel says it’s “right wing anti queer propaganda”
MSM NEEDS TO DIE.
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
1) Drag queen was busted with child porn!
2) People call that out
3) Spiegel says it’s “right wing anti queer propaganda”
MSM NEEDS TO DIE.
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
🤬4😡4❤🔥1
ELON'S GROKIPEDIA DECLARES WAR ON WIKIPEDIA'S PROPAGANDA
Grokipedia - Elon's AI-written encyclopedia promising "maximum truth" is hitting Wikipedia's activist bias...hard.
The differences? Grokipedia leads George Floyd's entry with his criminal record. Wikipedia leads with "murdered by police."
Jan 6? Wikipedia says "armed insurrection." Grokipedia highlights Ashli Babbitt's death and fraud claims first.
RFK Jr gets "lawyer, author" instead of "conspiracy theorist."
It has 885,000 AI-generated articles, with an edit button built in, and already catching heat from WIRED for smashing mainstream media narratives...
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
Grokipedia - Elon's AI-written encyclopedia promising "maximum truth" is hitting Wikipedia's activist bias...hard.
The differences? Grokipedia leads George Floyd's entry with his criminal record. Wikipedia leads with "murdered by police."
Jan 6? Wikipedia says "armed insurrection." Grokipedia highlights Ashli Babbitt's death and fraud claims first.
RFK Jr gets "lawyer, author" instead of "conspiracy theorist."
It has 885,000 AI-generated articles, with an edit button built in, and already catching heat from WIRED for smashing mainstream media narratives...
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
👏9
Bitcoin is protection against central banking anal penetration via inflation. Stack accordingly
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
✍3💯3
From the people, for the people. Bitcoin will be the next global reserve currency. Prepare accordingly
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
💯4
Another smart trader, CLegS2, spent 260 $SOL($50.6K) to buy 3.5M $GHOST over the past 8 hours.
This trader previously made $3.8M on $TRUMP, $704K on $arc, $558K on $GOAT, and $378K on $USELESS.
Address:
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
This trader previously made $3.8M on $TRUMP, $704K on $arc, $558K on $GOAT, and $378K on $USELESS.
Address:
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
🫡2
AI TAKES THE BLAME FOR MASS LAYOFFS - BUT IS IT JUST A COVER STORY?
Amazon, Goldman Sachs, Salesforce, Meta, UPS - America’s biggest employers are slashing tens of thousands of jobs, all while praising artificial intelligence as a “productivity revolution.”
But the evidence suggests a different story.
14,000 jobs gone at Amazon, with executives crediting “AI-related efficiencies.” Yet hours later, another spokesperson admitted “AI is not the reason behind the vast majority of reductions.”
Instead, it’s about cost-cutting and restructuring, the kind of moves companies have always made when profits dip.
Across corporate America, “AI” has become the perfect scapegoat:
Walmart says it’s freezing headcount because of automation.
Goldman Sachs and Salesforce cite “AI efficiencies” while trimming thousands.
UPS cut 34,000 jobs, calling it “powered by automation.”
... But new data shows the math doesn’t add up.
A Boston Consulting Group survey found 60% of firms saw minimal cost savings from AI despite major investment.
Only 10% told Deloitte they’ve achieved significant ROI.
At Wharton, researchers concluded most AI gains are incremental - shaving “20 minutes off an email,” not transforming industries.
MIT economist, David Autor:
“It’s much easier for a company to say, ‘We’re realizing AI efficiencies’ than to admit to financial strain.”
Meanwhile, many of these same companies face sluggish growth and market pressure - Amazon’s shares are flat, Salesforce’s down nearly 30%, and Meta even cut staff in its own AI division for being “bloated.”
So is AI truly replacing workers - or just masking old-fashioned belt-tightening?
The tech may be new, but the corporate playbook looks very familiar.
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
Amazon, Goldman Sachs, Salesforce, Meta, UPS - America’s biggest employers are slashing tens of thousands of jobs, all while praising artificial intelligence as a “productivity revolution.”
But the evidence suggests a different story.
14,000 jobs gone at Amazon, with executives crediting “AI-related efficiencies.” Yet hours later, another spokesperson admitted “AI is not the reason behind the vast majority of reductions.”
Instead, it’s about cost-cutting and restructuring, the kind of moves companies have always made when profits dip.
Across corporate America, “AI” has become the perfect scapegoat:
Walmart says it’s freezing headcount because of automation.
Goldman Sachs and Salesforce cite “AI efficiencies” while trimming thousands.
UPS cut 34,000 jobs, calling it “powered by automation.”
... But new data shows the math doesn’t add up.
A Boston Consulting Group survey found 60% of firms saw minimal cost savings from AI despite major investment.
Only 10% told Deloitte they’ve achieved significant ROI.
At Wharton, researchers concluded most AI gains are incremental - shaving “20 minutes off an email,” not transforming industries.
MIT economist, David Autor:
“It’s much easier for a company to say, ‘We’re realizing AI efficiencies’ than to admit to financial strain.”
Meanwhile, many of these same companies face sluggish growth and market pressure - Amazon’s shares are flat, Salesforce’s down nearly 30%, and Meta even cut staff in its own AI division for being “bloated.”
So is AI truly replacing workers - or just masking old-fashioned belt-tightening?
The tech may be new, but the corporate playbook looks very familiar.
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
👀2