The British town where the 1400 children had been sexually abused by immigrants was strongly left-wing
but who do they blame?
The left?
No.
Immigrants?
No.
They blamed — “Men”
Which ofc when used by the left always means “white men”
The one group who had nothing to do with this at all.
Typical left.
UK is cooked.
but who do they blame?
The left?
No.
Immigrants?
No.
They blamed — “Men”
Which ofc when used by the left always means “white men”
The one group who had nothing to do with this at all.
Typical left.
UK is cooked.
💯6😢1
DoomPosting
Another of the left’s favorite tricks — repeatedly replacing specific words and phrases with increasingly vague meaningless BS. This manipulation is something they’ve done everywhere, and weaponized to great effect. Refuse to accept the left’s manipulative…
Call them as they are
commies not liberals
even if they don’t like it
refuse to give into their fake language
commies not liberals
even if they don’t like it
refuse to give into their fake language
💯10🔥3
Well that’s part, that most readily talk about,
but then there’s also another part, which almost no one talks about
— That as soon as the prediction market predictions are actually used for anything of value, whether intentionally or not,
then if value of having control over those predictions outstrips the cost of moving the markets
…it becomes net profitable to manipulate the markets.
i.e. externalities.
E.g. Good reason to believe that the left is pumping both the polls and the prediction markets for the election,
even if it appears to be a money losing proposition when you look at the markets alone,
— because of the value of these externalities.
Specifically that tons of NPCs out there just want to do whatever they think everyone else is doing, and so tricking them to believe that everyone else is about to do something actually makes them do it — and having that control can have big value…
These problems are often solvable, but in many cases doing so is not exactly trivial at all.
But, as Hayek points out, you can never get people to adopt advances in such tech willingly.
In all likelihood, at some point, someone will finish building this and just force it upon everyone.
but then there’s also another part, which almost no one talks about
— That as soon as the prediction market predictions are actually used for anything of value, whether intentionally or not,
then if value of having control over those predictions outstrips the cost of moving the markets
…it becomes net profitable to manipulate the markets.
i.e. externalities.
E.g. Good reason to believe that the left is pumping both the polls and the prediction markets for the election,
even if it appears to be a money losing proposition when you look at the markets alone,
— because of the value of these externalities.
Specifically that tons of NPCs out there just want to do whatever they think everyone else is doing, and so tricking them to believe that everyone else is about to do something actually makes them do it — and having that control can have big value…
These problems are often solvable, but in many cases doing so is not exactly trivial at all.
But, as Hayek points out, you can never get people to adopt advances in such tech willingly.
In all likelihood, at some point, someone will finish building this and just force it upon everyone.
🔥5✍3👀1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
“Taxi ride in Japan."
“i feel his pain.”
“i feel his pain.”
🫡9🤣1