DoomPosting
TBF, according to this study, + orthodox: extreme collectivist commie side + protestant: extreme individualist anti-commie side + catholic: extremely wide bars, spanning the range from collectivist commie to individualist anti-commie …Though wouldn’t be…
Probably Catholic should span the whole top from left to right,
Other than that, looks about right.
Other than that, looks about right.
💯6😁2
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Masked and armed Muslim immigrants of Pakistani origin have taken over Birmingham, the second largest city in the UK.
Anyone who is white is advised to avoid being alone and going to no-go zones they’ve established.
Anyone who is white is advised to avoid being alone and going to no-go zones they’ve established.
🤬9
DoomPosting
All they do is lie. It’s all they know how to do.
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
"two tier policing is a myth"
(2020)
(2020)
🤬5😡3
“He’s a narcissist! He doesn’t care about you, he’s only doing it for himself!”
One of those extremely left-for-left kinds of arguments.
Interesting thing is that, while the left sees this argument as a massive fatal blow,
— the left cannot comprehend how the right doesn’t see this as an effective insult at all.
Why?
Difference in world models.
Left deeply believes the world has to be fully zero-sum, right deeply believes it does not have to be.
Deep down the left deeply believes the world to be zero-sum, that any gains by one must be from losses by another.
To them, gains by him MUST sooner or later balance out with losses by you.
Right meanwhile, believes the world is NOT zero-sum at all, that mutually-agreed selfish maximization is the root of all that is great, and that gains by one don’t neccessarily have to be balanced out with losses by others, not now, not ever. Add to that, the right seeing “caring” empathy so often being the excuse for great evil.
Now, lately often seing this mistake being made by the right, using arguments that would make the right mad, to try to make the left mad.
E.g. Telling last week with the right telling the left that they support woman beating, when the left is the party of women beating, especially for those unaligned, or those beaten by the wrong people…
Drastically different world models.
Completely different arguments arising from these differing world models.
Often can’t just take one side’s type of argument and use it on the other side, who has a completely different world model.
Know your enemy.
One of those extremely left-for-left kinds of arguments.
Interesting thing is that, while the left sees this argument as a massive fatal blow,
— the left cannot comprehend how the right doesn’t see this as an effective insult at all.
Why?
Difference in world models.
Left deeply believes the world has to be fully zero-sum, right deeply believes it does not have to be.
Deep down the left deeply believes the world to be zero-sum, that any gains by one must be from losses by another.
To them, gains by him MUST sooner or later balance out with losses by you.
Right meanwhile, believes the world is NOT zero-sum at all, that mutually-agreed selfish maximization is the root of all that is great, and that gains by one don’t neccessarily have to be balanced out with losses by others, not now, not ever. Add to that, the right seeing “caring” empathy so often being the excuse for great evil.
Now, lately often seing this mistake being made by the right, using arguments that would make the right mad, to try to make the left mad.
E.g. Telling last week with the right telling the left that they support woman beating, when the left is the party of women beating, especially for those unaligned, or those beaten by the wrong people…
Drastically different world models.
Completely different arguments arising from these differing world models.
Often can’t just take one side’s type of argument and use it on the other side, who has a completely different world model.
Know your enemy.
💯6👏2