IMO no humans should ever be dictating the meaning of words
Instead all real words arising from some simple verifiably true world models / incentives models
All words discovered, none invented
All arising from some innate reality, none the subjective inventions of man
Which would stop dead all these arguments of “But X said they were this”, “But X actually did that, which Y said means Z”, etc
— All irrelevant.
Anything anyone says becomes irrelevant.
Anything anyone does that someone says is identified as something is irrelevant.
— Just like as in e.g. “Basic Color Terms: Their Universality and Evolution”, where the order in which colors are named by societies can be replicated to a shocking degree just starting from a simple model of the distribution of frequency vs sensitivity in the human eye, along with a simple communication efficiency model.
All real words a discovery of an innate reality, not a culture-specific subjective invention of man.
Innateness discovery over social constructs and subjectivity is a FUNDAMENTAL belief of the right — and the more right you are the more places you see it in.
But many of the supposed extreme-right don’t believe in this innate meaning of real words are all.
Successful left psyop.
Extreme right is far less right than they think they are, than they should be.
Real word meanings get their meaning from innate reality, not man, regardless of whether you or anyone is smart enough to understand why or how that is.
So of course, we should do the same for political words as well, probably by inventing an entirely new set of words, all defined as arising from a simple verifiably-true world model, which in turn arise from reality itself.
All real words a discovery of an innate reality, not a culture-specific subjective invention of man.
Discovery not invention.
Real words are real.
Instead all real words arising from some simple verifiably true world models / incentives models
All words discovered, none invented
All arising from some innate reality, none the subjective inventions of man
Which would stop dead all these arguments of “But X said they were this”, “But X actually did that, which Y said means Z”, etc
— All irrelevant.
Anything anyone says becomes irrelevant.
Anything anyone does that someone says is identified as something is irrelevant.
— Just like as in e.g. “Basic Color Terms: Their Universality and Evolution”, where the order in which colors are named by societies can be replicated to a shocking degree just starting from a simple model of the distribution of frequency vs sensitivity in the human eye, along with a simple communication efficiency model.
All real words a discovery of an innate reality, not a culture-specific subjective invention of man.
Innateness discovery over social constructs and subjectivity is a FUNDAMENTAL belief of the right — and the more right you are the more places you see it in.
But many of the supposed extreme-right don’t believe in this innate meaning of real words are all.
Successful left psyop.
Extreme right is far less right than they think they are, than they should be.
Real word meanings get their meaning from innate reality, not man, regardless of whether you or anyone is smart enough to understand why or how that is.
So of course, we should do the same for political words as well, probably by inventing an entirely new set of words, all defined as arising from a simple verifiably-true world model, which in turn arise from reality itself.
All real words a discovery of an innate reality, not a culture-specific subjective invention of man.
Discovery not invention.
Real words are real.
💯7🔥1👌1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
“Another protest has been pushed aside by gardai and trucks full of equipment are now moving onto the site.
This place is enormous and the government say it will house thousands of male ‘asylum seekers’.
Ireland is being conquered before our eyes.”
This place is enormous and the government say it will house thousands of male ‘asylum seekers’.
Ireland is being conquered before our eyes.”
🤬7😡5