Illustration of the cap-to-liquidity ratios for different liquidity thicknesses
The top line is the usual, easy-to-pump & easy-to-crash curve that all pumpfun coins, $MOODENG, and many others use.
BUT, see how the coins with less steep, thicker curves
— Are the ones that achieved far higher market caps.
Was a major reason $BOME was listed on Binance was because of its unusually thick liquidity curve?
Maybe.
(Created this chart myself.)
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
The top line is the usual, easy-to-pump & easy-to-crash curve that all pumpfun coins, $MOODENG, and many others use.
BUT, see how the coins with less steep, thicker curves
— Are the ones that achieved far higher market caps.
Was a major reason $BOME was listed on Binance was because of its unusually thick liquidity curve?
Maybe.
(Created this chart myself.)
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
👏3
But,
— Not all that is thick should be longed
…despite that it’s clear that top coins ARE usually the ones with thicker liquidity
(Perhaps this is showing a survivorship effect? Thicker liquidity = greater longevity?)
E.g. $NAP, launched just after $BOME,
Which has an incredibly thick cap-to-liquidity ratio:
$8.3 cap vs $6M SOL = 1.38x
So, cap-to-liquidity ratio is very important, in enabling pumps and preventing dumps
— But coins are totally handicapped from adjusting this liquidity thickness ratio post-launch, due to extreme disincentives against it.
Is this something that needs to be fixed? If so, could it be fixed, incentives-wise?
This remains an open problem, that AFAIK no one has ever publicly addressed.
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
— Not all that is thick should be longed
…despite that it’s clear that top coins ARE usually the ones with thicker liquidity
(Perhaps this is showing a survivorship effect? Thicker liquidity = greater longevity?)
E.g. $NAP, launched just after $BOME,
Which has an incredibly thick cap-to-liquidity ratio:
$8.3 cap vs $6M SOL = 1.38x
So, cap-to-liquidity ratio is very important, in enabling pumps and preventing dumps
— But coins are totally handicapped from adjusting this liquidity thickness ratio post-launch, due to extreme disincentives against it.
Is this something that needs to be fixed? If so, could it be fixed, incentives-wise?
This remains an open problem, that AFAIK no one has ever publicly addressed.
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
👏5👀3🗿1
Guy bought $MOODENG at $143k, and dumped it all at $5k, for a 96% loss,
Today, a few weeks later, $MOODENG is now at $300M
Which sounds crazy when you look at $MOODENG’s almost perfectly up-only chart,
But if you zoom way into the first few hours post-launch, you can see exactly what happened
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
Today, a few weeks later, $MOODENG is now at $300M
Which sounds crazy when you look at $MOODENG’s almost perfectly up-only chart,
But if you zoom way into the first few hours post-launch, you can see exactly what happened
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
🤣5🫡2
DoomPosting
🚨🚨 Now: Trump doing a twitter space on crypto Space 🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
Update:
Left continues canceling of the right.
Will only keep getting worse until right starts extreme cancelling of the left
Right safe spaces are not nearly enough, not the answer
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
Left continues canceling of the right.
Will only keep getting worse until right starts extreme cancelling of the left
Right safe spaces are not nearly enough, not the answer
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
💯5🤬2🤣1
Why the defensive move of right-wing safe spaces is not nearly enough?
= Because the left will just hijack anything the right has, as soon as it becomes big or important enough to be worth hijacking
Must be actively hostile, aggressively cancelling the left as soon as they begin to spread their cancer, or else boom, hijacked.
“Any organization not explicitly and constitutionally right-wing will sooner or later become left-wing.”
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
= Because the left will just hijack anything the right has, as soon as it becomes big or important enough to be worth hijacking
Must be actively hostile, aggressively cancelling the left as soon as they begin to spread their cancer, or else boom, hijacked.
“Any organization not explicitly and constitutionally right-wing will sooner or later become left-wing.”
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
💯7
DoomPosting
? 🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
Indeed a clear breakout on the total marketcap of all coins excluding the top-10
What happens next?
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
What happens next?
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
👀5
That’s averaging 48% higher each day, if you start at the top of that big initial spike,
or averaging 71% higher each day, if you start at the bottom of the initial spike
Basically, after the first spike, growing an average of 50% per day.
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
or averaging 71% higher each day, if you start at the bottom of the initial spike
Basically, after the first spike, growing an average of 50% per day.
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
👀4😱1
Market crashes after first fed rate cuts?
In 2019 crypto was crashing after the rate cut happened, but the crashing started before the rate cut
But ofc, this is only a sample size of 1, and the covid crash greatly complicates what happened next
Must go further back
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
In 2019 crypto was crashing after the rate cut happened, but the crashing started before the rate cut
But ofc, this is only a sample size of 1, and the covid crash greatly complicates what happened next
Must go further back
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
❤🔥5
“Stocks perform better when rate cuts are not accompanied by a recession.”
And since it’s an election year, has there been higher than usual pressure to avoid a recession?
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
And since it’s an election year, has there been higher than usual pressure to avoid a recession?
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
👏5
“Stocks have typically dipped going into a rate cut and risen in the months that followed.”
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
👏4