No you absolute retards
Nationalism or so-called racism is not the fundamental belief of the right
TONS, the vast majority, of undeniably extremely left-wing movements through out the ages, and today, have been extremely nationalistic or so-called racist
Plenty of examples of such communist governments even today
That either of these could be the fundamental beliefs “proving” that you’re right-wing is clear nonsense on its face
All of the most left-wing governments of all time would be right-wing by this measure
Even wokipedia admits this
Makes zero sense
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
Nationalism or so-called racism is not the fundamental belief of the right
TONS, the vast majority, of undeniably extremely left-wing movements through out the ages, and today, have been extremely nationalistic or so-called racist
Plenty of examples of such communist governments even today
That either of these could be the fundamental beliefs “proving” that you’re right-wing is clear nonsense on its face
All of the most left-wing governments of all time would be right-wing by this measure
Even wokipedia admits this
Makes zero sense
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
💯8😐1
Not a real answer,
But yes, true, especially of the lib-right
Exactly one most obvious way to split everything equally, per the left belief
= equally split among everyone
Left has one obvious most ideal measure of merit, even if junk — equally split
No analogous single best concrete measure of merit for the right
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
But yes, true, especially of the lib-right
Exactly one most obvious way to split everything equally, per the left belief
= equally split among everyone
Left has one obvious most ideal measure of merit, even if junk — equally split
No analogous single best concrete measure of merit for the right
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
💯5😐1
Hundreds of replies to that tweet,
All nonsense,
Zero attempt at a real answer
Vast majority clearly incapable of understanding the very concept of meritorious measures and mechanisms for allocation of value and control
Hayek, or whoever his ghost writer was, was right
To understand our civilisation, one must appreciate that the extended order resulted not from human design or intention but spontaneously: it arose unintentionally
The unwitting, reluctant, even painful adoption of these practices …. enabled them to be 'fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it'
This process is perhaps the least appreciated facet of human evolution
Many easily understand what the left is, and can see its evil, can understand it’s bad to support that
Very few can really understand what is the right
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
All nonsense,
Zero attempt at a real answer
Vast majority clearly incapable of understanding the very concept of meritorious measures and mechanisms for allocation of value and control
Hayek, or whoever his ghost writer was, was right
To understand our civilisation, one must appreciate that the extended order resulted not from human design or intention but spontaneously: it arose unintentionally
The unwitting, reluctant, even painful adoption of these practices …. enabled them to be 'fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth, and subdue it'
This process is perhaps the least appreciated facet of human evolution
Many easily understand what the left is, and can see its evil, can understand it’s bad to support that
Very few can really understand what is the right
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
💯5👀2
(1) She says she generally prefers mating with one group over another, because she finds a certain group’s humor more attractive than another group’s
(2) Proven strong assortative mating for IQ
(3) Proven that humor strongly reveals IQ
(4) Proven IQ vs Own Race vs Partner Race tendencies
— Impressive how perfectly these random tiktoks line up with the (real) science
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
(2) Proven strong assortative mating for IQ
(3) Proven that humor strongly reveals IQ
(4) Proven IQ vs Own Race vs Partner Race tendencies
— Impressive how perfectly these random tiktoks line up with the (real) science
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
💯5🤯3😐3