👀9⚡2❤🔥1🏆1
Very incomplete,
But interesting breakdown idea.
Yes,
Definitely most of those most “in the culture” have very few followers, little engagement — Got to dig deep into the culture to find those next $BOMEs
Definitely many of the supposed tech influencers are horribly out of the culture, or opposite of the latest culture, in every way, e.g. Vitalik
And yeah, lots of the high-engagement ones that normies love are horribly disconnected both from the culture and the tech
Missing many influencers,
But nailed the principles here
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
But interesting breakdown idea.
Yes,
Definitely most of those most “in the culture” have very few followers, little engagement — Got to dig deep into the culture to find those next $BOMEs
Definitely many of the supposed tech influencers are horribly out of the culture, or opposite of the latest culture, in every way, e.g. Vitalik
And yeah, lots of the high-engagement ones that normies love are horribly disconnected both from the culture and the tech
Missing many influencers,
But nailed the principles here
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
👌5💯4
Smart thing about these new AI goonbots is that they keep their replies extremely short
— Which is enough to evade essentially all of the off-the-shelf AI detectors available today
But that’s a big problem, since platforms like Twitter and Telegram, where replies tend to be way too short for those AI detectors to judge
So this is why our new scoreboard AI system took an entirely different approach
— Which is essentially calculating the amount of information added in the reply vs what it’s replying to, using some AI techniques
= These would all be not counted, despite being way too short for classic AI detectors, because they add essentially zero information vs what they were replying to
So that’s why we did our anti-AI-spambot detection scoreboards in a whole new way.
Preliminary results — seems to work shockingly well at distinguishing AI replies from human replies, especially when looking at many replies made by an account.
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
— Which is enough to evade essentially all of the off-the-shelf AI detectors available today
But that’s a big problem, since platforms like Twitter and Telegram, where replies tend to be way too short for those AI detectors to judge
So this is why our new scoreboard AI system took an entirely different approach
— Which is essentially calculating the amount of information added in the reply vs what it’s replying to, using some AI techniques
= These would all be not counted, despite being way too short for classic AI detectors, because they add essentially zero information vs what they were replying to
So that’s why we did our anti-AI-spambot detection scoreboards in a whole new way.
Preliminary results — seems to work shockingly well at distinguishing AI replies from human replies, especially when looking at many replies made by an account.
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
👏6💯3❤🔥2
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
MustStopMurad’s “most important lesson from my 10 years in Crypto”
= You have to be either
(A) a day trader
= which always greatly underperform each cycle, if not get totally wrecked
(B) early-stage-VC-style holder
= aiming to catch the top couple potential giga-potential-wins which carry the whole rest of the portfolio that tends to go to zero, due to power law distribution of returns, while COMPLETELY IGNORING all the medium-potential typical pumpfun junk of the day that most obsess over
No surprise,
Exact same conclusion we reached cycles ago.
Undeniably right
Now there are some day traders dudes with youtube channels and huge follower counts who claim the opposite — THEY ARE LYING YOU UNFIXABLE ABSOLUTE RETARD. THEY MAKE THEIR MONEY ON AFFILIATE COMMISSIONS FROM DUMMIES LIKE YOU. Or they just crash out hard, like nearly all the day traders who did hit it big and kept going.
Virtually the only winners at the end of each cycle are the ones who are
(1) doing VC-style investing in catching the 200x to 1000x moonshot bets,
(2) while ignoring the medium-potential junk, and
(3) holding on for dear life
— Or else having someone else do this on your behalf.
Same conclusion that any non-scammer arrived at cycles ago
Cast a net that’s just aimed at catching potential moonshots & HODL, to moon or zero
MustStopMurad is right
VCs were right
Always ask yourself — Does the coin have the potential to be #1 at anything?
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
= You have to be either
(A) a day trader
= which always greatly underperform each cycle, if not get totally wrecked
(B) early-stage-VC-style holder
= aiming to catch the top couple potential giga-potential-wins which carry the whole rest of the portfolio that tends to go to zero, due to power law distribution of returns, while COMPLETELY IGNORING all the medium-potential typical pumpfun junk of the day that most obsess over
No surprise,
Exact same conclusion we reached cycles ago.
Undeniably right
Now there are some day traders dudes with youtube channels and huge follower counts who claim the opposite — THEY ARE LYING YOU UNFIXABLE ABSOLUTE RETARD. THEY MAKE THEIR MONEY ON AFFILIATE COMMISSIONS FROM DUMMIES LIKE YOU. Or they just crash out hard, like nearly all the day traders who did hit it big and kept going.
Virtually the only winners at the end of each cycle are the ones who are
(1) doing VC-style investing in catching the 200x to 1000x moonshot bets,
(2) while ignoring the medium-potential junk, and
(3) holding on for dear life
— Or else having someone else do this on your behalf.
Same conclusion that any non-scammer arrived at cycles ago
Cast a net that’s just aimed at catching potential moonshots & HODL, to moon or zero
MustStopMurad is right
VCs were right
Always ask yourself — Does the coin have the potential to be #1 at anything?
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
🔥8💯4😁2
Experienced investors
— Investing is like diving off a diving board
Inexperienced investors
— get buyers remorse, no brand to protect, things get wild
Indeed
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
— Investing is like diving off a diving board
Inexperienced investors
— get buyers remorse, no brand to protect, things get wild
Indeed
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
👀4💯2