This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Australian politician Allegra Spencer calls for more hate speech laws because paedophiles aren't protected under the current legislation
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
🤬15😁1
Vibe continues to deteriorate
Wouldn’t be surprised if one more quick hard dump before the market resumes upward
Good thing about it quickly deteriorating is that this likely means the bounce back up will be similarly quick
…once the move back up finally resumes
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
Wouldn’t be surprised if one more quick hard dump before the market resumes upward
Good thing about it quickly deteriorating is that this likely means the bounce back up will be similarly quick
…once the move back up finally resumes
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
🙏4🫡3💯1
Forwarded from Chadposting 🗿🗿🗿
👀 COIN ALERT:
⚠️WARN: Low amount of LP Providers - Only a few users are providing liquidity
Current Thresholds:
Note: Currently alerting on interesting signal thresholds. Not currently alerting based on what are likely good buys.
Note: Experimental, still testing. Do not share.
Entry Cap: $2_078_602Symbol: $STONKSName: STONKSAnnounced: 1737596587Signal-1: 0.238 ⚠️⚠️Signal-2: 0.239 ❌Liquidity: $342_615Created: 1.5h agoRefreshed: 52.9s agoAddress: 6NcdiK8B5KK2DzKvzvCfqi8EHaEqu48fyEzC8Mm9pumpFrom: ⚡Dexscreener Top BoostedLinks: Dexscreener | Twitter Search | Pumpfun⚠️WARN: Low amount of LP Providers - Only a few users are providing liquidity
Current Thresholds:
Min Liquidity: ✅ $75.9k ($342.6k)Min Signal-1: ✅ 0.090 (0.238)Min Signal-2: ❌ 1.500 (0.239)Min Cap: ✅ $1.2M ($2.1M)Min Age: ✅ 30.0m (1.5h)Max Age: ✅ 4.0d (1.5h)Note: Currently alerting on interesting signal thresholds. Not currently alerting based on what are likely good buys.
Note: Experimental, still testing. Do not share.
🫡2
Checking out how some of the strongest portfolio performers have been doing
Some of these charts pretty wild
E.g. $STONKS,
up 22.1x from entry,
$2.1M → 600k → $46.0M
MASSIVE drawdown on this one
Really reinforcing the buy & hold to moon or zero strategy
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
Some of these charts pretty wild
E.g. $STONKS,
up 22.1x from entry,
$2.1M → 600k → $46.0M
MASSIVE drawdown on this one
Really reinforcing the buy & hold to moon or zero strategy
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
🫡2🤯1💯1
DoomPosting
Trump says he wants trade Ukraine rare earths for US military aide 🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Zelensky responds to Trump
Agrees in principle with Trump’s trade offer of Ukraine’s rare earth minerals for US military aide
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
Agrees in principle with Trump’s trade offer of Ukraine’s rare earth minerals for US military aide
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
👏4😁3🏆3😐2
DoomPosting
Zelensky responds to Trump Agrees in principle with Trump’s trade offer of Ukraine’s rare earth minerals for US military aide 🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
Anyone started to notice yet, that all nearly every time big T offers something,
it always takes the same general form?
= TRADE
Ever notice that whenever the left did something, it always took a very different form?
= guilt tripping, “need”-based instead of “trade”-based, “equity” redistribution, always unilateral, NEVER a trade where both sides agree to give something, and both sides stand to benefit
— And if you remember, this is the most fundamental, central principle of the right, of markets themselves,
"The most important single central fact about a free market is that no exchange takes place unless both parties benefit."
True right frames EVERYTHING in terms of trade, refuses to trade unless both sides stand to benefit
(Or otherwise acts to fix broken markets, so that proper trade may again occur)
That Big T’s 1987 claim-to-fame book was literally about constructing good trades,
— Is perhaps the strongest evidence in support of him being true right-wing to the core
Trade -vs- “Equity”, think about it
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
it always takes the same general form?
= TRADE
Ever notice that whenever the left did something, it always took a very different form?
= guilt tripping, “need”-based instead of “trade”-based, “equity” redistribution, always unilateral, NEVER a trade where both sides agree to give something, and both sides stand to benefit
— And if you remember, this is the most fundamental, central principle of the right, of markets themselves,
"The most important single central fact about a free market is that no exchange takes place unless both parties benefit."
True right frames EVERYTHING in terms of trade, refuses to trade unless both sides stand to benefit
(Or otherwise acts to fix broken markets, so that proper trade may again occur)
That Big T’s 1987 claim-to-fame book was literally about constructing good trades,
— Is perhaps the strongest evidence in support of him being true right-wing to the core
Trade -vs- “Equity”, think about it
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
💯7
DoomPosting
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
Voluntary trade
— True essence of the right
i.e.
(1) Voluntary trade deals, where both sides stand to benefit
AND
(2) Involuntary forced-elimination of monopolizing entities that have destroyed voluntary mutually-beneficial trade, who’ve destroyed merit-based allocation of resources and control
(And yes, property rights and merit-based allocation are somewhat in tension, but in most cases it’s pretty clear)
Trade, not equity
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
— True essence of the right
i.e.
(1) Voluntary trade deals, where both sides stand to benefit
AND
(2) Involuntary forced-elimination of monopolizing entities that have destroyed voluntary mutually-beneficial trade, who’ve destroyed merit-based allocation of resources and control
(And yes, property rights and merit-based allocation are somewhat in tension, but in most cases it’s pretty clear)
Trade, not equity
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
💯6
Close, but reversed
They force the sh&tty ideology down everyone’s throats in persuit of their “equity” goal
Replacing markets and voluntary trade with negative-sum “equity” forced wealth redistribution IS their real goal
Their issue is never the issue
Their real issue is always their communist revolution
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
They force the sh&tty ideology down everyone’s throats in persuit of their “equity” goal
Replacing markets and voluntary trade with negative-sum “equity” forced wealth redistribution IS their real goal
Their issue is never the issue
Their real issue is always their communist revolution
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
💯5⚡2
DoomPosting
Zelensky responds to Trump Agrees in principle with Trump’s trade offer of Ukraine’s rare earth minerals for US military aide 🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Zelensky previously, when pleading with leftist leaders:
“If you cannot give us some financial support, okay please give us credit and we will give you back money.”
— Will again repeat that
LEFT’s prefered style
= Loans & credit scores
RIGHT’s preferred style
= Investments & trade of something other than money for fixed amount of future money
Both do a bit of both, but clearly there’s a very strong opposing preference that each side has, for one or the other
Never heard anyone point this out, but clearly seems true
Left prefers loans
Right prefers investment trade deals
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
“If you cannot give us some financial support, okay please give us credit and we will give you back money.”
— Will again repeat that
LEFT’s prefered style
= Loans & credit scores
RIGHT’s preferred style
= Investments & trade of something other than money for fixed amount of future money
Both do a bit of both, but clearly there’s a very strong opposing preference that each side has, for one or the other
Never heard anyone point this out, but clearly seems true
Left prefers loans
Right prefers investment trade deals
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
💯6🙏1
How big was $SOL’s most recent drawdown, from ATH to subsequent low?
= ((271.92 - 176.01) / 271.92) * 100
= -35%
Another drop coming, to drop it to -38%?
Or was that the local bottom for now?
(In theory should be able to make an expected-max-drawdown-percent versus market cap calculation, based on Bitcoin’s volatility vs market cap over time
— And then apply that to other coins like $SOL, to see what it’s expected drawdown should be now, for each of these mini-pullbacks
Will do that sometime, to see how well that works)
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
= ((271.92 - 176.01) / 271.92) * 100
= -35%
Another drop coming, to drop it to -38%?
Or was that the local bottom for now?
(In theory should be able to make an expected-max-drawdown-percent versus market cap calculation, based on Bitcoin’s volatility vs market cap over time
— And then apply that to other coins like $SOL, to see what it’s expected drawdown should be now, for each of these mini-pullbacks
Will do that sometime, to see how well that works)
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
👀2
Ethereum & its ecosystem been making devs lives absolute hell for YEARS
Classic commie-infested incompetence
Total disregard for product quality
And now that it’s finally reached a breaking point, commie sympathizers will come out of the woodwork to cover for them
NO
All the non-devs and commie sympathizers that are covering for the Ethereum Ecosystem’s horrible disregard for quality can get f&^cked
Ethereum had this a long time coming, and they deserve every bit of it and more
Time for the industry to eject those who easily could fix their severe quality problems, with the millions or billions they have, but choose not to — because they’re merit-hating commies
DEPORT
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
Classic commie-infested incompetence
Total disregard for product quality
And now that it’s finally reached a breaking point, commie sympathizers will come out of the woodwork to cover for them
NO
All the non-devs and commie sympathizers that are covering for the Ethereum Ecosystem’s horrible disregard for quality can get f&^cked
Ethereum had this a long time coming, and they deserve every bit of it and more
Time for the industry to eject those who easily could fix their severe quality problems, with the millions or billions they have, but choose not to — because they’re merit-hating commies
DEPORT
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
💯6
DoomPosting
Probability-based arguments = Nearly always lies — but not because of the part you see, which tends to be true, but rather due to the parts you don’t see, hidden assumptions that are lies, which make the whole thing bad overall Correct, that “Probability…
And…
Left prefers probability-based arguments
Right prefers value-based arguments
“But bro we only wrongly blocked 0.3% of sites”
Bro, those 0.3% of sites are where 90% of your traffic is going
= horrible value-wise
“But we only increased the foreigners by 1%”
Bro, those 1% are largely severe career criminals, emptied from the prisons of other countries, and are now comitting 90% of the violent crime
= horrible, value-wise
Probability-centric arguments are for lefties
Value-centric arguments are for the right
Can’t convince me otherwise
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
Left prefers probability-based arguments
Right prefers value-based arguments
“But bro we only wrongly blocked 0.3% of sites”
Bro, those 0.3% of sites are where 90% of your traffic is going
= horrible value-wise
“But we only increased the foreigners by 1%”
Bro, those 1% are largely severe career criminals, emptied from the prisons of other countries, and are now comitting 90% of the violent crime
= horrible, value-wise
Probability-centric arguments are for lefties
Value-centric arguments are for the right
Can’t convince me otherwise
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
💯7