Forwarded from Chadposting 🗿🗿🗿
👀 COIN ALERT:
⚠️WARN: Low amount of LP Providers - Only a few users are providing liquidity
Current Thresholds:
Macro Conditions:
❗❗ VERY BAD (38) = DO NOT BUY NEW LAUNCHES (11.7m)
Note: Currently alerting on interesting signal thresholds. Not currently alerting based on what are likely good buys.
Note: Experimental, still testing. Do not share.
Entry Cap: $1_203_125Entry Date: Wednesday, February 5, 2025 at 8:35 AM ESTSymbol: $TANZANIAName: OFFICIAL TANZANIAAnnounced: 1738762513Signal-1: 0.120 ⚠️Signal-2: 3.317 ✅✅✅Liquidity: $131_507Created: 23.7m agoRefreshed: 9.0s agoAddress: 9FTsV2o25JLokK12DcfXFHE5cQF9yEjGrCWLKAT5pumpFrom: ⚡Dexscreener Top BoostedLinks: Dexscreener | Twitter Search | Pumpfun⚠️WARN: Low amount of LP Providers - Only a few users are providing liquidity
Current Thresholds:
Min Liquidity: ✅ $75.9k ($131.5k)Min Signal-1: ✅ 0.090 (0.120)Min Signal-2: ✅ 1.500 (3.317)Min Cap: ✅ $1.2M ($1.2M)Min Age: ✅ 0.0s (23.8m)Max Age: ✅ 2.0d (23.8m)Macro Conditions:
❗❗ VERY BAD (38) = DO NOT BUY NEW LAUNCHES (11.7m)
Note: Currently alerting on interesting signal thresholds. Not currently alerting based on what are likely good buys.
Note: Experimental, still testing. Do not share.
👀3
DoomPosting
The guy is a supposed African billionaire, with 2.2 million twitter followers 🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
Tweet link
Argument for it being real? — Trump did it, now so can the other rich dudes too
Continuing to research deeper
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
Argument for it being real? — Trump did it, now so can the other rich dudes too
Continuing to research deeper
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
👀3
DoomPosting
Chat is this real — Or another hack 🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
Continuing upward, currently 3x - 4x
Rediculous time to launch a coin, but let’s see what happens
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
Rediculous time to launch a coin, but let’s see what happens
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
👀5
He’s got a spaces scheduled for 9 min from now
Let’s see if that pumps it or dumps it
Spaces link
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
Let’s see if that pumps it or dumps it
Spaces link
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
💯2👀2
DoomPosting
9gag CEO on $PAIN presale Let’s see what happens… 🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
$PAIN presale update 2 hours ago
Apparently they’re saying that the liquidity would be too thick if they used all $40M that was raised,
and so they’re refunding 80%?
= Refunding $32M and using the remaining $8M for liquidity?
Will run the calculations myself next, but…
…Maybe that is legit reasoning?
$BOME was already one of the thickest launches ever, with just $1.6M of SOL & 50% of the token supply put into the pool at launch
And a strange artifact of these constant-product pools is that the thickness of the token at launch is kinda set in stone once created, incentives wise — long story, but, essentially
And indeed the thicker the liquidity, the more money needed to pump the price
For comparison, pumpfun pools are configured to have WAY TOO THIN liquidity, which is why IMO even the hottest pumpfun coins like $PNUT have crashed down much harder than e.g. $BOME did — all about that thickness. Easy rise easy fall.
So,
Bull case:
(1) They want the liquidity a little thinner than the insane thickness that adding $40M would do, giving it a little more pumpfun-like pop, just a little
(2) But, even with $8M, it would still be among the thickest liquidity pools ever, if they put it all in a raydium constant product pool, like most do — so still would be plenty thick
(3) BIG ONE: they’ve proven huge demand, and that huge amount of refunded money might be highly likely to go right back into buying $PAIN?
(4) But they don’t want to manage easy-to-screw-up task of doing all those post-launch buys with the funds themselves, so given the massive demand and likelihood of refunded buyers buying — they expect it to be easier to just refund 80% to the users and let them do the buys?
(5) Oh, also they’re refunding $SOL that was sent late. Very non-scammy nice thing for them to do — plenty of “legit” projects have just pocketed that late money as a donation.
Bear case:
You tell me?
At least so far, and if things continue to go according to this plan, $PAIN is starting to look great af?
Tweet link
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
Apparently they’re saying that the liquidity would be too thick if they used all $40M that was raised,
and so they’re refunding 80%?
= Refunding $32M and using the remaining $8M for liquidity?
Will run the calculations myself next, but…
…Maybe that is legit reasoning?
$BOME was already one of the thickest launches ever, with just $1.6M of SOL & 50% of the token supply put into the pool at launch
And a strange artifact of these constant-product pools is that the thickness of the token at launch is kinda set in stone once created, incentives wise — long story, but, essentially
And indeed the thicker the liquidity, the more money needed to pump the price
For comparison, pumpfun pools are configured to have WAY TOO THIN liquidity, which is why IMO even the hottest pumpfun coins like $PNUT have crashed down much harder than e.g. $BOME did — all about that thickness. Easy rise easy fall.
So,
Bull case:
(1) They want the liquidity a little thinner than the insane thickness that adding $40M would do, giving it a little more pumpfun-like pop, just a little
(2) But, even with $8M, it would still be among the thickest liquidity pools ever, if they put it all in a raydium constant product pool, like most do — so still would be plenty thick
(3) BIG ONE: they’ve proven huge demand, and that huge amount of refunded money might be highly likely to go right back into buying $PAIN?
(4) But they don’t want to manage easy-to-screw-up task of doing all those post-launch buys with the funds themselves, so given the massive demand and likelihood of refunded buyers buying — they expect it to be easier to just refund 80% to the users and let them do the buys?
(5) Oh, also they’re refunding $SOL that was sent late. Very non-scammy nice thing for them to do — plenty of “legit” projects have just pocketed that late money as a donation.
Bear case:
You tell me?
At least so far, and if things continue to go according to this plan, $PAIN is starting to look great af?
Tweet link
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
👀4💯2
Forwarded from DoomPosting
$BOME case study of how liquidity thickness basically set-in-stone from the start:
+ Reducing liquidity = extremely disincentivized, since removing liquidity is seen as a scam signal, so it usually remains locked.
+ Increasing liquidity = extremely disincentivized, because the person who ads the liquidity ends up
= Liquidity thickness basically set-in-stone once a coin launches
(Created this chart myself.)
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
+ Reducing liquidity = extremely disincentivized, since removing liquidity is seen as a scam signal, so it usually remains locked.
+ Increasing liquidity = extremely disincentivized, because the person who ads the liquidity ends up
= Liquidity thickness basically set-in-stone once a coin launches
(Created this chart myself.)
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
💯2👀1