DoomPosting
Voluntary trade — True essence of the right i.e. (1) Voluntary trade deals, where both sides stand to benefit AND (2) Involuntary forced-elimination of monopolizing entities that have destroyed voluntary mutually-beneficial trade, who’ve destroyed merit…
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Left = non-voluntary, centralized tyranny of the majority, “trade union” = EU
Right = decentralized voluntary trade agreements = disband the EU
That no exchange may take place unless all are part of the deal stand to benefit
Voluntary association
Art of the deal
It really is the central dividing line between left and right
— EU concept is leftist af, to its core, by its very nature
EU is fundamentally an extremely leftist, anti-rightest system of organization
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
Right = decentralized voluntary trade agreements = disband the EU
That no exchange may take place unless all are part of the deal stand to benefit
Voluntary association
Art of the deal
It really is the central dividing line between left and right
— EU concept is leftist af, to its core, by its very nature
EU is fundamentally an extremely leftist, anti-rightest system of organization
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
👏11
DoomPosting
Left = non-voluntary, centralized tyranny of the majority, “trade union” = EU Right = decentralized voluntary trade agreements = disband the EU That no exchange may take place unless all are part of the deal stand to benefit Voluntary association Art of…
— “Bilateral trade” to contrast with “Multilateralism”
BTW, very strange choice of wording,
— Type of terminology’s a lie on its face, but few seem to realize it?
I.e. “Multilateralism” implying it has a monopoly on coordination among more than 2 parties,
as if more than 2 parties to coming to a mutually-beneficial terms for voluntary exchange agreement is somehow too hard, if not impossible,
— which DO appear to strongly believe, even on the right
…but it’s simply not true at all?
Swear that ~zero even realize the general form that the negotiation offers in such an N-party voluntary exchange negotiation take?
A while back worked on a startup to fully automate this in a trustless way, but world apparently not ready for this yet, and so this will be the next big thing in the next crypto wave
Oddly, did ONCE recently randomly see an old jewish joke online, that correctly identified the general form that such N-party voluntary exchange agreements take… which kinda raises more questions than answers
Anyway, usual commie wordcel tricks — words than on their face imply that if more than 2 nations are involved, suddenly you just MUST switch to commie “democracy” tyrrany of the majority of countries, if not a commie central planning committee, e.g. UN.
“Bilateralism” vs “Multilateralism” distinction is a lie on its face
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
BTW, very strange choice of wording,
— Type of terminology’s a lie on its face, but few seem to realize it?
I.e. “Multilateralism” implying it has a monopoly on coordination among more than 2 parties,
as if more than 2 parties to coming to a mutually-beneficial terms for voluntary exchange agreement is somehow too hard, if not impossible,
— which DO appear to strongly believe, even on the right
…but it’s simply not true at all?
Swear that ~zero even realize the general form that the negotiation offers in such an N-party voluntary exchange negotiation take?
A while back worked on a startup to fully automate this in a trustless way, but world apparently not ready for this yet, and so this will be the next big thing in the next crypto wave
Oddly, did ONCE recently randomly see an old jewish joke online, that correctly identified the general form that such N-party voluntary exchange agreements take… which kinda raises more questions than answers
Anyway, usual commie wordcel tricks — words than on their face imply that if more than 2 nations are involved, suddenly you just MUST switch to commie “democracy” tyrrany of the majority of countries, if not a commie central planning committee, e.g. UN.
“Bilateralism” vs “Multilateralism” distinction is a lie on its face
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
💯6
DoomPosting
— “Bilateral trade” to contrast with “Multilateralism” BTW, very strange choice of wording, — Type of terminology’s a lie on its face, but few seem to realize it? I.e. “Multilateralism” implying it has a monopoly on coordination among more than 2 parties…
Even good old rightist Milton, in perhaps his most famous quote,
saying “BOTH”
— wrongly implying that voluntary exchange negotiation and agreement among more than 2 parties simultaneously isn’t a thing, or is simply infeasible
But that’s simply a lie
True that most wrongly believe this, clearly, including Milton himself
But it’s simly not true
Strange
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
saying “BOTH”
— wrongly implying that voluntary exchange negotiation and agreement among more than 2 parties simultaneously isn’t a thing, or is simply infeasible
But that’s simply a lie
True that most wrongly believe this, clearly, including Milton himself
But it’s simly not true
Strange
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
💯6
Founder coin — still at $140M
-vs-
VC coin — collapsedto $14M
VCs really living up to their horrible reptuations, yet again this cycle.
Has there been a single VC memecoin yet, that didn’t have the same old “sorry I’m stupid” nonsense disasters?
Apologies in advance to the 1-in-100 VCs who aren’t total scumbags
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
-vs-
VC coin — collapsedto $14M
VCs really living up to their horrible reptuations, yet again this cycle.
Has there been a single VC memecoin yet, that didn’t have the same old “sorry I’m stupid” nonsense disasters?
Apologies in advance to the 1-in-100 VCs who aren’t total scumbags
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
💯6
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
3,000 top-performing applicants for air traffic controllers were REJECTED by FAA for being white
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
😢7🤬6🤯4