Before his election, Trump promised to use the accreditation system to confiscate up to 100% of the endowment of schools that were misbehaving, discriminating, etc.
He has just issued the executive order to set that in motion.
The order also targets the American Bar Association, the Liaison Committee on Medical Education, and the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education.
Why?
Because they've been prioritizing applicants on the basis of race instead of qualification.
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
He has just issued the executive order to set that in motion.
The order also targets the American Bar Association, the Liaison Committee on Medical Education, and the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education.
Why?
Because they've been prioritizing applicants on the basis of race instead of qualification.
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
👏11🔥6👀1
Should point out that it always has been a strong, stated, right-wing belief that the US president has little domestic power,
as opposed to international power, e.g. tariff wars, kinetic wars — where the president has a great deal of power
This fits well with the right-wing belief that one should first focus their efforts for improving society LOCALLY, whether by cleaning the parks, or doing their part in ejecting the fake email job HR commie hoes, and only then shifting focus outward toward state level, and then national and beyond.
This is as opposed to the common left-wing belief that presidents are omnipotent dictators domestically.
— On this I agree ofc with the right, if you’re not doing you part to stomp out the commie rise right in your own individual interactions, your own workplace and community, then you’re useless.
This is a war won or lost by the people in the trenches, not so much by the generals far from the front lines.
Right believes that self-sufficiency rather than dependency on others is the path to salvation.
Get off your ass, start fighting the enemies in your own workplace and community, and encourage others to do the same
To the point, signing EOs against affirmative action IS A HUGE SHIFT, if only because NO ONE at the top ever gave them any pushback in the many years since 1971, Griggs v. Duke Power Co., decades of downward slide now showing the first signs of reversal
But, if you ever thought that someone other than you would be fighting the bulk of this battle, then you’re either disingenuous or a bit of moron
This always was a core right-wing belief
Organizing new ways to fight them will be the only path to victory
Man the trenches, the only savior can be you
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
as opposed to international power, e.g. tariff wars, kinetic wars — where the president has a great deal of power
This fits well with the right-wing belief that one should first focus their efforts for improving society LOCALLY, whether by cleaning the parks, or doing their part in ejecting the fake email job HR commie hoes, and only then shifting focus outward toward state level, and then national and beyond.
This is as opposed to the common left-wing belief that presidents are omnipotent dictators domestically.
— On this I agree ofc with the right, if you’re not doing you part to stomp out the commie rise right in your own individual interactions, your own workplace and community, then you’re useless.
This is a war won or lost by the people in the trenches, not so much by the generals far from the front lines.
Right believes that self-sufficiency rather than dependency on others is the path to salvation.
Get off your ass, start fighting the enemies in your own workplace and community, and encourage others to do the same
To the point, signing EOs against affirmative action IS A HUGE SHIFT, if only because NO ONE at the top ever gave them any pushback in the many years since 1971, Griggs v. Duke Power Co., decades of downward slide now showing the first signs of reversal
But, if you ever thought that someone other than you would be fighting the bulk of this battle, then you’re either disingenuous or a bit of moron
This always was a core right-wing belief
Organizing new ways to fight them will be the only path to victory
Man the trenches, the only savior can be you
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
🔥8💯5
Women, especially those high in narcissism, use emojis more frequently.
Overall, women reported using emojis more often than men. Only six emojis were used more frequently by men than women (i.e., Pile of Poop, Fire, Exploding Head, Face Screaming in Fear, 100 Points, and Person with Folded Hands)
The more frequent use of emojis by men who report higher Machiavellianism may reflect a communication strategy focused on conveying information to impact the receiver’s point of view (i.e., a persuasive and/or manipulative strategy).
Our results are novel in that they are the first to document relationships between Dark Triad personality traits and self-reported emoji use.
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
Overall, women reported using emojis more often than men. Only six emojis were used more frequently by men than women (i.e., Pile of Poop, Fire, Exploding Head, Face Screaming in Fear, 100 Points, and Person with Folded Hands)
The more frequent use of emojis by men who report higher Machiavellianism may reflect a communication strategy focused on conveying information to impact the receiver’s point of view (i.e., a persuasive and/or manipulative strategy).
Our results are novel in that they are the first to document relationships between Dark Triad personality traits and self-reported emoji use.
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
🤯6💯3🔥2😐2
🔥🤯😱💯🙏
Mfw these are exactly the most commonly-used reactions in this group
— Minus the poop, made the editorial decision not to fill the group made for pretty memes with poop. Surprising, right
FWIW, have heard right-wing girls saying they were suspicious of guys who used emojis much in texts, and looking like they’re vindicated
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
Mfw these are exactly the most commonly-used reactions in this group
— Minus the poop, made the editorial decision not to fill the group made for pretty memes with poop. Surprising, right
FWIW, have heard right-wing girls saying they were suspicious of guys who used emojis much in texts, and looking like they’re vindicated
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
🔥8🤯4😱3🙏3💯3🤝2
Reaction emojis on posts largely arise from their common business uses years ago, company slack channel reactions, reactions in asian business group chats used to signify formal approval, rejection, confirmation, etc — meant for communication efficiency and clarity, despite having a lot to say
Emojis in texts arise from — something else
Stickers arise from the idea of easily-reusable memes, but should good memes really be reused much? — world still working out what to do with stickers, feels kinda stop-gap half-way
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
Emojis in texts arise from — something else
Stickers arise from the idea of easily-reusable memes, but should good memes really be reused much? — world still working out what to do with stickers, feels kinda stop-gap half-way
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
😁4💯2🔥1
It’s known what causes low fertility,
It’s been well-proven since decades ago at least, in many formal studies even
but nearly everyone is terrified to say it
— It’s women earning the same as men
Vast majority of women are unattracted to any man earning less than them, for serious dating purposes,
And wanting to have babies with a guy is several levels up from that — she has to be expecting he’ll make much more than her
(This also includes getting years of food and shelter paid for by school loans or parents paying them while they continue school, same idea, functionally equivalent)
Many will scream murder at you for saying it, but is it true?
Is what it is
Coach Bruce was right
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
It’s been well-proven since decades ago at least, in many formal studies even
but nearly everyone is terrified to say it
— It’s women earning the same as men
Vast majority of women are unattracted to any man earning less than them, for serious dating purposes,
And wanting to have babies with a guy is several levels up from that — she has to be expecting he’ll make much more than her
(This also includes getting years of food and shelter paid for by school loans or parents paying them while they continue school, same idea, functionally equivalent)
Many will scream murder at you for saying it, but is it true?
Is what it is
Coach Bruce was right
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
💯9😁6😐1
Women instinctually want to have children with protectors who “save them” from poverty or attackers
E.g. women’s fairytales of a rich prince saving a girl from relative poverty, or… countless examples in reality if you’ve bothered to pay attention
But what does this mean, once society “advances” to the level where the threat of poverty and physical attacks is gone?
= Women then only can be attracted to men, in this “he saved me”, deep instinctual way if something gets taken away from them, which men could then give them back
= TAKING AWAY money from women would be expected to be FAR MORE effective at raising fertility rates than GIVING women money
…And indeed that is what we see with much poorer women having far higher fertility rates
Are there other ways?
Perhaps
But hard to overcome the huge instinctual appeal of a man “saving them” from poverty and starvation
But how could instincts be backwards and destructive like that, incentivizing the opposite of what they say they want?
Countless such cases. This is just yet another to add to the list.
(These gender roles are flipped in ~5% of women, e.g. women lawyers, and then there’s another ~10% of women who really like men no matter what, but broadly, it holds)
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
E.g. women’s fairytales of a rich prince saving a girl from relative poverty, or… countless examples in reality if you’ve bothered to pay attention
But what does this mean, once society “advances” to the level where the threat of poverty and physical attacks is gone?
= Women then only can be attracted to men, in this “he saved me”, deep instinctual way if something gets taken away from them, which men could then give them back
= TAKING AWAY money from women would be expected to be FAR MORE effective at raising fertility rates than GIVING women money
…And indeed that is what we see with much poorer women having far higher fertility rates
Are there other ways?
Perhaps
But hard to overcome the huge instinctual appeal of a man “saving them” from poverty and starvation
But how could instincts be backwards and destructive like that, incentivizing the opposite of what they say they want?
Countless such cases. This is just yet another to add to the list.
(These gender roles are flipped in ~5% of women, e.g. women lawyers, and then there’s another ~10% of women who really like men no matter what, but broadly, it holds)
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
💯8👀1