DoomPosting – Telegram
DoomPosting
7.72K subscribers
76.2K photos
22K videos
6 files
70.7K links
Degens Deteriorating
Download Telegram
Trade uncertainty may have peaked

🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
👀5🔥2
😐7👏6😡3❤‍🔥1😁1🤝1
If only you knew how much leftiness you’ve absorbed

🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
💯19
Estimated number of human workers expected to be replaced by humanoid robots

🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
😱4💯3🫡3👀2🤯1😐1
Effectively, the Fed must pick between containing either inflation or unemployment.

Not reducing interest rates will further weaken US GDP and likely increase unemployment.

However, if interest rates are cut immediately, we would expect to see another rebound in inflation.

Following this morning's data, odds of rate cuts beginning in June 2024 are up to 61%.

The fact that markets do not see IMMEDIATE cuts is more evidence of stagflation.

The market does not know which part of the Fed's dual mandate will be sided with.

Uncertainty is rising.

🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
👀6🔥1
Retards have more sex than the highest IQ men

🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
😁8🤯1😢1
DoomPosting
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
"adolescents with an IQ of 130 were 3-5 times less likely to have had intercourse than those with average IQ...

….boys with an IQ that would qualify for intellectual disability (60) were still more likely to have had sex than those with a very high IQ (130)"

🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
💯5😁1😐1
Do Women Really Select For Intelligence?

No, they select assortatively:

Retards Retards

Mids Mids

Genius Genius

One Problem:

Far fewer genius women than men, for this assortative matching

🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
👀6💯3
DoomPosting
Do Women Really Select For Intelligence? No, they select assortatively: Retards Retards Mids Mids Genius Genius One Problem: Far fewer genius women than men, for this assortative matching 🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
Now here’s a real fun fact, that extremely few have figured out

Assortative mate selection, as happens for many human traits,

— is often quite OPPOSITE of “survival of the fittest”, at the individual level

Not at all selecting “fittest” whatsoever — rather simply selecting someone most like themselves,

which obviously, is quite often opposite of the current environmental optimum

So what is assortative mating optimizing for?

= GROUP survival — rather than INDIVIDUAL survival

I.e. assortative mating MAINTAINS the fat distribution of traits — the tall & short, the tards & big brains — instead of collapsing everyone to the current optimum

Why?

= To maintain the GROUP’s ability to quickly adapt to CHANGING environment,

because the whole range of people with the whole range of traits already exists, allowing instant adaptation of the group as a whole — as opposed to VASTLY SLOWER mating selection-based adaptation

= Assortative mating often does the exact opposite of “survival of the fittest” at the individual level, essentially betting on the environment suddenly drastically changing, such that the currently non-optimal people then thrive

🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
👀5💯2
U.S. auto loan applications are being denied at the highest level in over ten years, per New York Federal Reserve

🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
👀5