Somehow always knew that there was no way Azealia Banks wrote this

And I don’t even know who Azealia Banks is, there’s just no way

Ofc she didn’t, and this guy did

🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶

New “Internet capital markets” narrative explained

🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶

Year of the coin launchers coming up

🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶

GM

🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶

State of the trenches

🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶

Unpopular opinion:

Every man who posts comments like this

— Is engaging in feminine behavior

Rallying others to fight while having all kinds of convenient excuses to do nothing yourself

= Peak feminine behavior

Literally

Men strongly prefer direct competition & confrontation — while often completely forgetting that they could rally others to help them

Women strongly prefer passive agressive tactics of secretly rallying others to fight on their behalf while refusing to directly confront those they wish to attack

This is one of the most widely-replicated and clear gender differences in all of legit social science

Screaming “Why won’t some men do something”, while having excuses to do nothing yourself

= Peak feminine behavior, no matter the excuses

🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶

Men tend to prefer direct competition.

Women tend to prefer social ostracizing and stigmatizing.

One of the strongest confirmed sex differences in all of social science.

Why don’t more people know about this?

Because they snakes of the world don’t want you to know about this,

so they can destroy you with their weaponization of ostracizing and stigmatizing, before you even know what hit you.

Also beware the snakes who’ve infested the right, suddenly screaming that the right must not use ostracizing and stigmatizing weapons, such as getting the left parasites fired.

We’re in a time of robust self-running institutions, a time when social weapons unfortunately reign, must be used more aggressively than ever.

Year of the launcher

(Not sure about this one in particular)

🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶

AI taking over

🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶

“Heritability of IQ increases with age”

(My only contention with IQ as a measure of G — is that it does not go far enough, perhaps in part due to the non-results oriented decision to make the sexes have the same average score. Someday we’ll have an even better measure of G, probably something designed to test general intelligence of AI, which conveniently has no sex.)

🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶

Study: Top 10 Replicated Findings From Behavioral Genetics

Finding 1. All psychological traits show significant and substantial genetic influence

= Nature > nurture, beyond your wildest dreams, everything left told you was a lie

Finding 2. No traits are 100% heritable

“heritability estimates are substantial, typically between 30% and 50%, but this range of estimates is a long way from 100%.”

— Notice the woke trick they slipped in here

The nature > nature believers believe that traits are hugely BIOLOGICAL, i.e. in the genes or biological factors like hormones,

but that is NOT THE SAME as HEREDITARY

= Strawman they put in here to appease the commies, and it would look contradictory with number 1 at first, but actually this is a sleight of hand, swapping one word for another very different word

Nature > nurture Chads still dominating

Finding 3. Heritability is caused by many genes of small effect

= Overturning the common commie scam of saying “but there’s no single gene controlling trait X, so it must be from nurture not nature!”

Single gene?

There was never any rule that traits each must be determined by 1 SINGLE gene

False presupposition nonsense on its face

Genes are encoded as a “distributed representation” so as to be more compact, much like in data compression or neural networks

I.e. many traits arising from a combination of genes, not just 1, obviously

Finding 4. Phenotypic correlations between psychological traits show significant and substantial genetic mediation

= The same set of genes often underlying many different genetic disorders, multiple manifestations of a common biological cause

Finding 5. The heritability of intelligence increases throughout development

= Nurture can in the short term wreck you or boost you — but in the longer term nature eventually dominates

Finding 6. Age-to-age stability is mainly due to genetics

“research has shown that phenotypic stability from age to age is mainly due to genetics for personality, psychopathology, and intelligence, domains for which the most longitudinal genetic data are available.”

“whereas age-to-age change is primarily the provenance of environmental factors”

Finding 7. Most measures of the “environment” show significant genetic influence

= Left often tries to claim that nurture X caused Y, and they do have a correlation, but when you look closer there’s a mediation, an underlying biological factor Z that shows a much stronger relationship with Y, and the nurture causation was an illusion

Again, supposed evidence of nurture causing some trait is overwhelmingly illusory lies, intentionally ignoring vastly stronger underlying biological cause

Finding 8. Most associations between environmental measures and psychological traits are significantly mediated genetically

“For example, rather than assuming that correlations between parenting and children’s behavior are caused by the environmental effect of parenting on children’s behavior, one should consider the possibility that the correlation is in part due to genetic factors that influence both parenting
and children’s behavior.”

Again, it’s the genes, dummy

Finding 9. Most environmental effects are not shared by children growing up in the same family

“But those who grew up in the same household must have experienced the same nurture!”

— Somewhat surprisingly, no, not at all

Finding 10. Abnormal is normal

— Basically they’re saying that common disorders can have many different genetic causes,

but given the error-correcting distributed-representation nature of genes, this may not be saying much,

other than that manifestation of major disabilities is when the biological problems were so many or so severe that they overcame nature’s error-correcting

^^ So, there you go,

Nearly everything the left told you about nature vs nurture was a lie

Nature > nurture utterly undefeated

🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶

Even worse will happen in crypto

Bunch were screaming that the bull run is done and over

Absolute losers

🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶