Study: Top 10 Replicated Findings From Behavioral Genetics
Finding 1. All psychological traits show significant and substantial genetic influence
= Nature > nurture, beyond your wildest dreams, everything left told you was a lie
Finding 2. No traits are 100% heritable
“heritability estimates are substantial, typically between 30% and 50%, but this range of estimates is a long way from 100%.”
— Notice the woke trick they slipped in here
The nature > nature believers believe that traits are hugely BIOLOGICAL, i.e. in the genes or biological factors like hormones,
but that is NOT THE SAME as HEREDITARY
= Strawman they put in here to appease the commies, and it would look contradictory with number 1 at first, but actually this is a sleight of hand, swapping one word for another very different word
Nature > nurture Chads still dominating
Finding 3. Heritability is caused by many genes of small effect
= Overturning the common commie scam of saying “but there’s no single gene controlling trait X, so it must be from nurture not nature!”
Single gene?
There was never any rule that traits each must be determined by 1 SINGLE gene
False presupposition nonsense on its face
Genes are encoded as a “distributed representation” so as to be more compact, much like in data compression or neural networks
I.e. many traits arising from a combination of genes, not just 1, obviously
Finding 4. Phenotypic correlations between psychological traits show significant and substantial genetic mediation
= The same set of genes often underlying many different genetic disorders, multiple manifestations of a common biological cause
Finding 5. The heritability of intelligence increases throughout development
= Nurture can in the short term wreck you or boost you — but in the longer term nature eventually dominates
Finding 6. Age-to-age stability is mainly due to genetics
“research has shown that phenotypic stability from age to age is mainly due to genetics for personality, psychopathology, and intelligence, domains for which the most longitudinal genetic data are available.”
“whereas age-to-age change is primarily the provenance of environmental factors”
Finding 7. Most measures of the “environment” show significant genetic influence
= Left often tries to claim that nurture X caused Y, and they do have a correlation, but when you look closer there’s a mediation, an underlying biological factor Z that shows a much stronger relationship with Y, and the nurture causation was an illusion
Again, supposed evidence of nurture causing some trait is overwhelmingly illusory lies, intentionally ignoring vastly stronger underlying biological cause
Finding 8. Most associations between environmental measures and psychological traits are significantly mediated genetically
“For example, rather than assuming that correlations between parenting and children’s behavior are caused by the environmental effect of parenting on children’s behavior, one should consider the possibility that the correlation is in part due to genetic factors that influence both parenting
and children’s behavior.”
Again, it’s the genes, dummy
Finding 9. Most environmental effects are not shared by children growing up in the same family
“But those who grew up in the same household must have experienced the same nurture!”
— Somewhat surprisingly, no, not at all
Finding 10. Abnormal is normal
— Basically they’re saying that common disorders can have many different genetic causes,
but given the error-correcting distributed-representation nature of genes, this may not be saying much,
other than that manifestation of major disabilities is when the biological problems were so many or so severe that they overcame nature’s error-correcting
^^ So, there you go,
Nearly everything the left told you about nature vs nurture was a lie
Nature > nurture utterly undefeated
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
Finding 1. All psychological traits show significant and substantial genetic influence
= Nature > nurture, beyond your wildest dreams, everything left told you was a lie
Finding 2. No traits are 100% heritable
“heritability estimates are substantial, typically between 30% and 50%, but this range of estimates is a long way from 100%.”
— Notice the woke trick they slipped in here
The nature > nature believers believe that traits are hugely BIOLOGICAL, i.e. in the genes or biological factors like hormones,
but that is NOT THE SAME as HEREDITARY
= Strawman they put in here to appease the commies, and it would look contradictory with number 1 at first, but actually this is a sleight of hand, swapping one word for another very different word
Nature > nurture Chads still dominating
Finding 3. Heritability is caused by many genes of small effect
= Overturning the common commie scam of saying “but there’s no single gene controlling trait X, so it must be from nurture not nature!”
Single gene?
There was never any rule that traits each must be determined by 1 SINGLE gene
False presupposition nonsense on its face
Genes are encoded as a “distributed representation” so as to be more compact, much like in data compression or neural networks
I.e. many traits arising from a combination of genes, not just 1, obviously
Finding 4. Phenotypic correlations between psychological traits show significant and substantial genetic mediation
= The same set of genes often underlying many different genetic disorders, multiple manifestations of a common biological cause
Finding 5. The heritability of intelligence increases throughout development
= Nurture can in the short term wreck you or boost you — but in the longer term nature eventually dominates
Finding 6. Age-to-age stability is mainly due to genetics
“research has shown that phenotypic stability from age to age is mainly due to genetics for personality, psychopathology, and intelligence, domains for which the most longitudinal genetic data are available.”
“whereas age-to-age change is primarily the provenance of environmental factors”
Finding 7. Most measures of the “environment” show significant genetic influence
= Left often tries to claim that nurture X caused Y, and they do have a correlation, but when you look closer there’s a mediation, an underlying biological factor Z that shows a much stronger relationship with Y, and the nurture causation was an illusion
Again, supposed evidence of nurture causing some trait is overwhelmingly illusory lies, intentionally ignoring vastly stronger underlying biological cause
Finding 8. Most associations between environmental measures and psychological traits are significantly mediated genetically
“For example, rather than assuming that correlations between parenting and children’s behavior are caused by the environmental effect of parenting on children’s behavior, one should consider the possibility that the correlation is in part due to genetic factors that influence both parenting
and children’s behavior.”
Again, it’s the genes, dummy
Finding 9. Most environmental effects are not shared by children growing up in the same family
“But those who grew up in the same household must have experienced the same nurture!”
— Somewhat surprisingly, no, not at all
Finding 10. Abnormal is normal
— Basically they’re saying that common disorders can have many different genetic causes,
but given the error-correcting distributed-representation nature of genes, this may not be saying much,
other than that manifestation of major disabilities is when the biological problems were so many or so severe that they overcame nature’s error-correcting
^^ So, there you go,
Nearly everything the left told you about nature vs nurture was a lie
Nature > nurture utterly undefeated
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
💯8🤯1
Even worse will happen in crypto
Bunch were screaming that the bull run is done and over
Absolute losers
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
Bunch were screaming that the bull run is done and over
Absolute losers
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
💯5😨1
DoomPosting
UnitedHealth collapse continues 🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
BREAKING: UnitedHealth stock, $UNH, falls over -6% as the Department of Justice announces an investigation into potential Medicare fraud
The stock is now down over -50% in one month, erasing -$350 billion of market cap
This collapse is unprecedented
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
The stock is now down over -50% in one month, erasing -$350 billion of market cap
This collapse is unprecedented
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
👏9🔥6😁1
H-1B visa numbers for FY 2026:
Despite mass tech layoffs and voter backlash—especially after the Christmas H-1B uproar—the Trump team stays hands-off: 120,141 NEW H-1Bs selected for FY2026.
Demand remains high despite layoffs—a clear sign U.S. workers are being replaced.
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
Despite mass tech layoffs and voter backlash—especially after the Christmas H-1B uproar—the Trump team stays hands-off: 120,141 NEW H-1Bs selected for FY2026.
Demand remains high despite layoffs—a clear sign U.S. workers are being replaced.
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
🤬14