DoomPosting
Study: Top 10 Replicated Findings From Behavioral Genetics Finding 1. All psychological traits show significant and substantial genetic influence = Nature > nurture, beyond your wildest dreams, everything left told you was a lie Finding 2. No traits are…
Top 10 Replicated Findings From Behavioral Genetics
#6 Finding 6. Age-to-age stability is mainly due to genetics
“Genetic amplification”
= Essentially, people never really change who they are — rather they become more of who they truly are biologically predisposed to be, as they age
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
#6 Finding 6. Age-to-age stability is mainly due to genetics
“Genetic amplification”
= Essentially, people never really change who they are — rather they become more of who they truly are biologically predisposed to be, as they age
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
🔥3👀3💯2
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Does biological predispision mean people can’t be changed?
No, both left and right DO still believe that people often can be changed, though their respective approaches are quite different:
Right: INCENTIVES are the best way to change people, and no amount of education about what’s good can change people’s minds, if you don’t change the incentives. Huge incentives changes through credible threat of serious jail time, if not removing people from the population entirely, is the only way. Edit: Oh, also biology-changing drugs.
Left: EDUCATION / NURTURE is all you need to convince these serial rapists and murderers that rape and murder is not good. Just no one ever taught them bro. They’ll totally change if we just educate them bro. Check out this educational no no square tiktok we did. That’ll stop the rapes bro.
Right loves change through incentives or just filtering for people with better matched biological-predisposition, while left loves change through education.
Which do you think really works better?
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
No, both left and right DO still believe that people often can be changed, though their respective approaches are quite different:
Right: INCENTIVES are the best way to change people, and no amount of education about what’s good can change people’s minds, if you don’t change the incentives. Huge incentives changes through credible threat of serious jail time, if not removing people from the population entirely, is the only way. Edit: Oh, also biology-changing drugs.
Left: EDUCATION / NURTURE is all you need to convince these serial rapists and murderers that rape and murder is not good. Just no one ever taught them bro. They’ll totally change if we just educate them bro. Check out this educational no no square tiktok we did. That’ll stop the rapes bro.
Right loves change through incentives or just filtering for people with better matched biological-predisposition, while left loves change through education.
Which do you think really works better?
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
💯6
Designer babies — Another new tech that will change the world,
and is certainly coming, whether we like it or not.
(Not that people didn’t already have huge lattitude in choosing the traits their children will have, through partner selection — but ofc this takes it up several notches.)
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
and is certainly coming, whether we like it or not.
(Not that people didn’t already have huge lattitude in choosing the traits their children will have, through partner selection — but ofc this takes it up several notches.)
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
👀5🤯1
Cost of genetic modification, like many other technologies,
— is dropping exponentially over time
Will become dirt cheap
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
— is dropping exponentially over time
Will become dirt cheap
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
🤯4💯4
TODO, researching later,
Eugenics, i.e. central authorities deciding what are the best genes
— Has this always been strictly a left-wing thing, despite suggestions otherwise?
Sure looks to be the case, on first glance
(No, choosing to maintain borders, which both the extreme-left and extreme-right have done through out history, is not eugenics.)
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
Eugenics, i.e. central authorities deciding what are the best genes
— Has this always been strictly a left-wing thing, despite suggestions otherwise?
Sure looks to be the case, on first glance
(No, choosing to maintain borders, which both the extreme-left and extreme-right have done through out history, is not eugenics.)
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
💯5👀5
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
China rolls out 100 EV driverless mining trucks at Yimin coal mine, powered by Huawei’s AI, 5G-A, and smart tech
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
🔥7😱2👀2