hE gOt HuNtED
bLaCkRoCk CoNtRoLs ThE PrIcEs
Stfu ya scamming retards
THESE PRICE MOVEMENTS ARE NEARLY ALWAYS JUST MIRRORING NASDAQ
Tradfi traders are not moving THE ENTIRE NASDAQ to “hunt” this dude
It’s not “manipulation” it’s “retardation”
Leveraged perps nearly always a horrible idea that virtually everyone but the house loses money on
Essentially a leveraged bet on Nasdaq, which you almost definitely do not have an edge on and which you can do without crypto
Much more financially destructive to crypto than memecoins ever could hope to be, with their deceptive negative-sum nature
Anyone who ever recommended leveraged perps is a retard and should be shamed
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
bLaCkRoCk CoNtRoLs ThE PrIcEs
Stfu ya scamming retards
THESE PRICE MOVEMENTS ARE NEARLY ALWAYS JUST MIRRORING NASDAQ
Tradfi traders are not moving THE ENTIRE NASDAQ to “hunt” this dude
It’s not “manipulation” it’s “retardation”
Leveraged perps nearly always a horrible idea that virtually everyone but the house loses money on
Essentially a leveraged bet on Nasdaq, which you almost definitely do not have an edge on and which you can do without crypto
Much more financially destructive to crypto than memecoins ever could hope to be, with their deceptive negative-sum nature
Anyone who ever recommended leveraged perps is a retard and should be shamed
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
💯5👀2
Uranium trading coming to Solana
They’re betting that exponential increase in energy needs due to AI will create huge demand for nuclear energy
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
They’re betting that exponential increase in energy needs due to AI will create huge demand for nuclear energy
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
👀11
From the 11th century onward, ~1% of men were sentenced to death each generation, which caused:
“the homicide rate plummeted from the 14th century to the 20th. The pool of violent men dried up until most murders occurred under conditions of jealousy, intoxication, or extreme stress”
Remember that in modern times, fewer than 1% of people commit greater than 50% of the violent crimes
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
“the homicide rate plummeted from the 14th century to the 20th. The pool of violent men dried up until most murders occurred under conditions of jealousy, intoxication, or extreme stress”
Remember that in modern times, fewer than 1% of people commit greater than 50% of the violent crimes
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
💯7👀6👏3
What a surprise
Armed guards means nothing if there’s zero credible threat that guards will actually use those arms to shoot people
People always forget the crucial “credible threat” part of incentives
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
Armed guards means nothing if there’s zero credible threat that guards will actually use those arms to shoot people
People always forget the crucial “credible threat” part of incentives
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
💯4🫡2
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Palestinians disregarding shots being fired into the air as one of the aid distribution sites in southern Gaza is overrun
They correctly determined that the armed guards wouldn’t be shooting anyone
Threats mean nothing if they’re not credible
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
They correctly determined that the armed guards wouldn’t be shooting anyone
Threats mean nothing if they’re not credible
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
🙏5💯4👀2😭1
Blah blah blah not reading all that because looks like you’re missing a HUGE HALF of the equation
Human mating has always had TWO huge parts:
(1) FEELS-BASED: Women’s mating preferences about ~everything EXCEPT money — Which puts WOMEN in 100% direct control over which genes get passed on, for these preferences
(2) WEALTH-BASED: Women’s perference to mate with whatever men are richer — Which actually takes any direct control over gene selection OUT OF WOMEN’S HANDS, and instead puts this gene selection control into the hands of some combination of MEN & NATURE forces to determine who gets richest. E.g. whatever men overcome nature and build the aquaduct that survives, or figure out how to forge swords whose metal works better, win the weath, and win the babes
I.e. to the degree that women just went with (2), just choosing whoever was getting wealthier — WOMEN WERE COMPLETELY GIVING UP CONTROL OVER GENE SELECTION, and passing that control to someone or something else
Arguably, with this in mind, women’s mating choices may have had ~ZERO responsibility for success in evolving man’s genes from primitive primates to modern man — instead that success being solely from a combination of man & nature, who determined wealth, arguably.
Now, where does a modern problem arise?
— When society has advanced to the point where things are running themselves, and suddenly women exercise great control in determining BOTH (1) and (2)
Suddenly women deciding not only based on their own personal preferences, but also obtaining great control in deciding which guys get wealthier and which are left poorer
I.e. the rise of Communism, vastly reshaping the decision over who gets richer or poorer in ways totally disconnected from natural reality in any way
— Could be expected to have massive effects on genes
Who gets rich was NEVER something decided by women, since the dawn of time — but now suddenly it is becoming so, which is a massive thing that few seem to have realized
He who controls the money controls the genes, in the long term
Think about it
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
Human mating has always had TWO huge parts:
(1) FEELS-BASED: Women’s mating preferences about ~everything EXCEPT money — Which puts WOMEN in 100% direct control over which genes get passed on, for these preferences
(2) WEALTH-BASED: Women’s perference to mate with whatever men are richer — Which actually takes any direct control over gene selection OUT OF WOMEN’S HANDS, and instead puts this gene selection control into the hands of some combination of MEN & NATURE forces to determine who gets richest. E.g. whatever men overcome nature and build the aquaduct that survives, or figure out how to forge swords whose metal works better, win the weath, and win the babes
I.e. to the degree that women just went with (2), just choosing whoever was getting wealthier — WOMEN WERE COMPLETELY GIVING UP CONTROL OVER GENE SELECTION, and passing that control to someone or something else
Arguably, with this in mind, women’s mating choices may have had ~ZERO responsibility for success in evolving man’s genes from primitive primates to modern man — instead that success being solely from a combination of man & nature, who determined wealth, arguably.
Now, where does a modern problem arise?
— When society has advanced to the point where things are running themselves, and suddenly women exercise great control in determining BOTH (1) and (2)
Suddenly women deciding not only based on their own personal preferences, but also obtaining great control in deciding which guys get wealthier and which are left poorer
I.e. the rise of Communism, vastly reshaping the decision over who gets richer or poorer in ways totally disconnected from natural reality in any way
— Could be expected to have massive effects on genes
Who gets rich was NEVER something decided by women, since the dawn of time — but now suddenly it is becoming so, which is a massive thing that few seem to have realized
He who controls the money controls the genes, in the long term
Think about it
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
💯4🤯3👀2
You’re both wrong you idiots
Women overwhelmingly selected the guys who they expected to give them more wealth
…usually just by looking at very simple crude proxy measures like their current wealth / credentials / social following
It’s the money morons
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
Women overwhelmingly selected the guys who they expected to give them more wealth
…usually just by looking at very simple crude proxy measures like their current wealth / credentials / social following
It’s the money morons
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
💯5
Forwarded from DoomPosting
“Resource shocks” studies
— Girlfriends who refused to have families suddenly demanding to get married and pregnant, after guys suddenly start earning much more than the women do
Many such cases
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
— Girlfriends who refused to have families suddenly demanding to get married and pregnant, after guys suddenly start earning much more than the women do
Many such cases
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
💯8
Been meaning to define this one for a while,
You: Post some unflattering but true statistic about women
Them: “You hate women”
On the surface, this is clearly nonsense, but it feels like they believe it does mean something, so what could it mean?
Answer: It’s women thinking, because the accuser thinks in the woman style, and so assumes others must too.
I.e. the accuser is saying that everyone must be evil-feminine passive-aggressive.
I.e. Passive aggressive means hating someone, but instead of directly confronting them, you being a two-faced person who says they love them while spreading terrible things about them.
Meanwhile, in feminine-thinking world, if you like someone you’re also supposed to only say nice or neutral things about someone, even if they’re total lies.
Ofc, this is not male thinking at all — where it can be perfectly fine to share truths for the sake of truth, regardless of whether you hate or love someone.
= I.e. This is an accusation by the female-minded who are accusing you of being female minded, because their theory of mind is so bad that they can’t imagine anyone not being female-minded.
(Or putting on a fake performance for an audience with horrible theory of mind that can’t imagine anyone not being female-minded.)
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
You: Post some unflattering but true statistic about women
Them: “You hate women”
On the surface, this is clearly nonsense, but it feels like they believe it does mean something, so what could it mean?
Answer: It’s women thinking, because the accuser thinks in the woman style, and so assumes others must too.
I.e. the accuser is saying that everyone must be evil-feminine passive-aggressive.
I.e. Passive aggressive means hating someone, but instead of directly confronting them, you being a two-faced person who says they love them while spreading terrible things about them.
Meanwhile, in feminine-thinking world, if you like someone you’re also supposed to only say nice or neutral things about someone, even if they’re total lies.
Ofc, this is not male thinking at all — where it can be perfectly fine to share truths for the sake of truth, regardless of whether you hate or love someone.
= I.e. This is an accusation by the female-minded who are accusing you of being female minded, because their theory of mind is so bad that they can’t imagine anyone not being female-minded.
(Or putting on a fake performance for an audience with horrible theory of mind that can’t imagine anyone not being female-minded.)
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
💯5