Second driver of the wider trend, which “lazy girl jobs” are a subset of, and with lazy/retarded men and women benefit from
— The EQ > IQ professional management philosophy that’s steadily grown over the last 1 or 2 decades, around the world.
Of course there’s no real EQ test, or even a real definition of EQ / emotional intelligence that isn’t trivially cheated. Totally fake BS.
Fundamental to this philosophy are the claims that
(1) That the high-EQ should be the ruling class. Not doing the work, just ruling.
(2) That it’s basically impossible to have IQ and EQ at the same time = Simply ever showing that you’re non-retarded, competent and doing whatever the real work is — is defacto proof of being low EQ.
(3) Women, and their simp allies, are, of course, much higher EQ, because science supposedly (all lies, closest relevant science seems to point to the complete opposite…)
In the end, a large number of both retarded simping men allies and women of all sorts benefit from this management theory, in these big companies.
Anyone capable of doing the work = automatically disqualified from ruling. Too convenient.
Slow collapse.
🐻🐻🐻
— The EQ > IQ professional management philosophy that’s steadily grown over the last 1 or 2 decades, around the world.
Of course there’s no real EQ test, or even a real definition of EQ / emotional intelligence that isn’t trivially cheated. Totally fake BS.
Fundamental to this philosophy are the claims that
(1) That the high-EQ should be the ruling class. Not doing the work, just ruling.
(2) That it’s basically impossible to have IQ and EQ at the same time = Simply ever showing that you’re non-retarded, competent and doing whatever the real work is — is defacto proof of being low EQ.
(3) Women, and their simp allies, are, of course, much higher EQ, because science supposedly (all lies, closest relevant science seems to point to the complete opposite…)
In the end, a large number of both retarded simping men allies and women of all sorts benefit from this management theory, in these big companies.
Anyone capable of doing the work = automatically disqualified from ruling. Too convenient.
Slow collapse.
🐻🐻🐻
👍4
DoomPosting
“most of them are non-technical tech roles”
The job advice that “none is” telling women.
Somehow none of the 3000+ comments seem to have noticed the prominent mistake either.
Only scratches the surface of the incompetence, laziness that has totally flooded big tech.
No, this won’t make big tech collapse anytime soon.
For now big tech and their grateful hired morons only continue to grow stronger, richer.
🐻
Somehow none of the 3000+ comments seem to have noticed the prominent mistake either.
Only scratches the surface of the incompetence, laziness that has totally flooded big tech.
No, this won’t make big tech collapse anytime soon.
For now big tech and their grateful hired morons only continue to grow stronger, richer.
🐻
That time a Canadian hospital killed a woman for not wearing a mask, got caught purposely hiding evidence, and got away with it all
😢1
Mission find a probability-based argument that isn’t insane: impossible
Probability-based arguments nearly always hide the insanity of the ratio of 2 things that are being measured by the probability number
— the ratio of the amount of lab-grown humans versus the amount of cells that turned out not to be humans…. tf kind of insane choice of a ratio to focus on is that
And they disguise the insanity of the choice of the 2 things they chose to make a ratio of… by focusing on a ~100% or ~0% number,
As if ~100% or 0% are always supposed to be good, and you should never bother questioning what exactly are the 2 things in the ratio.
Probably-based arguments are near always lies.
Lies that fool NPCs extremely well.
Probability-based arguments nearly always hide the insanity of the ratio of 2 things that are being measured by the probability number
— the ratio of the amount of lab-grown humans versus the amount of cells that turned out not to be humans…. tf kind of insane choice of a ratio to focus on is that
And they disguise the insanity of the choice of the 2 things they chose to make a ratio of… by focusing on a ~100% or ~0% number,
As if ~100% or 0% are always supposed to be good, and you should never bother questioning what exactly are the 2 things in the ratio.
Probably-based arguments are near always lies.
Lies that fool NPCs extremely well.
👍6