So the guy outright lied,

as shown in the chart above,

But the real strange thing?

— Whole comments section is filled with hundreds of people who just blindly accepted his BS false presupposition, that the chart shows nothing,

Nearly all instead just skipping over to more minor, secondary issues,

instead of confronting the core lie that the chart shows nothing

Humans are INCREDIBLY vulnerable to being manipulated by false presuppositions

🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶

Ok, I’ll spell it out

Dude brings charts on ACT scores,

uses those charts to say that the male curve doesn’t look fatter than the female curve enough to show sex differences

— But he refused to actually show that sex difference line

So plug in his own summary statistics and get AI to actually plot that sex differences line, and we see that his claim was BS

— Men hugely overrepresented at the the top and bottom of those curves

Just like the greater male variability hypothesis predicted

I.e. dude’s own numbers showing he was BSing

— And plotting the curves as he did is classic lying with statistics, because it hides away the parts of the data that show the most important parts of the data

There are several better ways to plot this data that are far less misleading, as we’ve shown

🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶