DoomPosting
So the guy outright lied, as shown in the chart above, But the real strange thing? — Whole comments section is filled with hundreds of people who just blindly accepted his BS false presupposition, that the chart shows nothing, Nearly all instead just skipping…
Ok, I’ll spell it out
Dude brings charts on ACT scores,
uses those charts to say that the male curve doesn’t look fatter than the female curve enough to show sex differences
— But he refused to actually show that sex difference line
So plug in his own summary statistics and get AI to actually plot that sex differences line, and we see that his claim was BS
— Men hugely overrepresented at the the top and bottom of those curves
Just like the greater male variability hypothesis predicted
I.e. dude’s own numbers showing he was BSing
— And plotting the curves as he did is classic lying with statistics, because it hides away the parts of the data that show the most important parts of the data
There are several better ways to plot this data that are far less misleading, as we’ve shown
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
Dude brings charts on ACT scores,
uses those charts to say that the male curve doesn’t look fatter than the female curve enough to show sex differences
— But he refused to actually show that sex difference line
So plug in his own summary statistics and get AI to actually plot that sex differences line, and we see that his claim was BS
— Men hugely overrepresented at the the top and bottom of those curves
Just like the greater male variability hypothesis predicted
I.e. dude’s own numbers showing he was BSing
— And plotting the curves as he did is classic lying with statistics, because it hides away the parts of the data that show the most important parts of the data
There are several better ways to plot this data that are far less misleading, as we’ve shown
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
💯2
DoomPosting
Ok, I’ll spell it out Dude brings charts on ACT scores, uses those charts to say that the male curve doesn’t look fatter than the female curve enough to show sex differences — But he refused to actually show that sex difference line So plug in his own…
Why just plotting the probability density curves, as he has, misleading lying with statistics?
For one, when plotted this way,
it moves the biggest gap to the MIDDLE (red)
and then it spreads out the rest of the mass in the opposite direction along the sides (blue), to make it less noticeable
— when truthfully the sides are where the hugest differences are, as shown by the U-shaped line on the second chart
Classic lying with statistics
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
For one, when plotted this way,
it moves the biggest gap to the MIDDLE (red)
and then it spreads out the rest of the mass in the opposite direction along the sides (blue), to make it less noticeable
— when truthfully the sides are where the hugest differences are, as shown by the U-shaped line on the second chart
Classic lying with statistics
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
🔥2💯1
More on Strategy $MSTR.
This chart shows how MSTR's price has moved up and down relative to Bitcoin's price. The black line indicates the deviation from the trend. The red line converts that deviation into a percentile.
How to read this chart:
This chart is best read as an indicator of sentiment for MSTR.
If the black line is at -30%, then assuming things revert to the mean, MSTR:Bitcoin would increase 30%.
Because this is a ratio, this could mean that MSTR goes up 30% or BTC goes down 30%, or some combination of the two.
The red line converts to a probability. If the red line is at 10%, there is a 90% chance the ratio will move up.
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
This chart shows how MSTR's price has moved up and down relative to Bitcoin's price. The black line indicates the deviation from the trend. The red line converts that deviation into a percentile.
How to read this chart:
This chart is best read as an indicator of sentiment for MSTR.
If the black line is at -30%, then assuming things revert to the mean, MSTR:Bitcoin would increase 30%.
Because this is a ratio, this could mean that MSTR goes up 30% or BTC goes down 30%, or some combination of the two.
The red line converts to a probability. If the red line is at 10%, there is a 90% chance the ratio will move up.
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
👀1
DoomPosting
Ok, I’ll spell it out Dude brings charts on ACT scores, uses those charts to say that the male curve doesn’t look fatter than the female curve enough to show sex differences — But he refused to actually show that sex difference line So plug in his own…
And would add that using normal distribution summary statistics, as that guy did, further distorts how extremely ~100% male the edges often become
— because, as you can see, the normal distribution approximations cause the Male/Female ratios to attenuate as you near the edges
— but that’s an error of the normal approximations
Really, the real empirical the female rates often go straight off a cliff, and the curves themselves are more pointy triangle things that hardly look like the normal approximation at all
(Except when there’s large
measurement error — which blurs things to look more like normal distributions. But again, that’s a problem with the measurement, not reflecting the underlying reality)
Basically numerous completely separate reasons why the reality is far more extreme even than thus guy’s charts show
— Though even with his numerous methods to hide the truth, he still couldn’t fully hide it
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
— because, as you can see, the normal distribution approximations cause the Male/Female ratios to attenuate as you near the edges
— but that’s an error of the normal approximations
Really, the real empirical the female rates often go straight off a cliff, and the curves themselves are more pointy triangle things that hardly look like the normal approximation at all
(Except when there’s large
measurement error — which blurs things to look more like normal distributions. But again, that’s a problem with the measurement, not reflecting the underlying reality)
Basically numerous completely separate reasons why the reality is far more extreme even than thus guy’s charts show
— Though even with his numerous methods to hide the truth, he still couldn’t fully hide it
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
💯1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
BREAKING: Trump is planning on signing an executive order Thursday CRACKING DOWN on those who burn the American flag
Trump is ordering the DOJ to attempt to bring charges of disorderly conduct, public nuisance, environmental violations, and more to those who burn old glory in the streets, per NewsNation
h/t TimcastNews
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
Trump is ordering the DOJ to attempt to bring charges of disorderly conduct, public nuisance, environmental violations, and more to those who burn old glory in the streets, per NewsNation
h/t TimcastNews
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
👏2😡1
FOMC: The Fed minutes reveal the majority of FOMC officials saw inflation as greater risk than labor market concerns at the July meeting
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
🤬3
No your daughter doesn’t now love physics, she loves stories about fireflies
Creating != Consuming
Creating new physics is HARD
Would you let random music fans play in the band?
No, that’s absurd
Consuming music is wildly different from creating new music
You don’t invite the groupies to play in the band
But that’s the nonsense being pulled every day, with women-in-tech for extremely male-tilted fields
Creating != Consuming
Creating is all that matters and pure consumers are groupie losers
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
Creating != Consuming
Creating new physics is HARD
Would you let random music fans play in the band?
No, that’s absurd
Consuming music is wildly different from creating new music
You don’t invite the groupies to play in the band
But that’s the nonsense being pulled every day, with women-in-tech for extremely male-tilted fields
Creating != Consuming
Creating is all that matters and pure consumers are groupie losers
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🄾🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
💯4❤🔥3🔥1🙏1
- Military Preparing Attacks on Mexican Cartels
The Trump administration has directed the military to prepare for lethal strikes against cartel targets inside Mexico, three military sources tell us.
The Top Secret planning order, issued in late Spring, directs Northern Command (NORTHCOM) to manage the attacks, which are to be ready by mid-September.
Though U.S.-Mexico military relations are broad and cooperative, any military action south of the border is considered extremely sensitive for both Washington and the Mexican federal government and is rarely discussed in public.
“Not only is Donald Trump uniquely focused on TCOs transnational criminal organizations, the official name for cartels, having designated them terrorists in one of his first Executive Orders, but he has shown himself to be willing to take unilateral action despite potentially negative political ramifications,” says one senior intelligence official. He and the other sources say that military action could be unilateral — that is, without the involvement or approval of the Mexican government.
The unprecedented order was discussed at a July meeting at NORTHCOM headquarters in Colorado Springs that was led by Colby Jenkins, the unconfirmed Assistant Secretary of Defense for Special Operations and Low-Intensity Conflict. Within days, Gen. Gregory M. Guillot, commander of NORTHCOM, hosted the two highest ranking Mexican military officials: Gen. Ricardo Trevilla Trejo, Secretary of National Defense, and Adm. Raymundo Pedro Morales Ángeles, Secretary of the Navy.
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
The Trump administration has directed the military to prepare for lethal strikes against cartel targets inside Mexico, three military sources tell us.
The Top Secret planning order, issued in late Spring, directs Northern Command (NORTHCOM) to manage the attacks, which are to be ready by mid-September.
Though U.S.-Mexico military relations are broad and cooperative, any military action south of the border is considered extremely sensitive for both Washington and the Mexican federal government and is rarely discussed in public.
“Not only is Donald Trump uniquely focused on TCOs transnational criminal organizations, the official name for cartels, having designated them terrorists in one of his first Executive Orders, but he has shown himself to be willing to take unilateral action despite potentially negative political ramifications,” says one senior intelligence official. He and the other sources say that military action could be unilateral — that is, without the involvement or approval of the Mexican government.
The unprecedented order was discussed at a July meeting at NORTHCOM headquarters in Colorado Springs that was led by Colby Jenkins, the unconfirmed Assistant Secretary of Defense for Special Operations and Low-Intensity Conflict. Within days, Gen. Gregory M. Guillot, commander of NORTHCOM, hosted the two highest ranking Mexican military officials: Gen. Ricardo Trevilla Trejo, Secretary of National Defense, and Adm. Raymundo Pedro Morales Ángeles, Secretary of the Navy.
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
🔥2
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Lincoln, California. A student at Lincoln High School caused a major disturbance on campus this week.
The footage shows the student engaged in a heated argument with a school staff member before assaulting the teacher.
The incident escalated quickly, prompting intervention from school police. An Officer was able to restrain the student outside the building without further incident.
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
The footage shows the student engaged in a heated argument with a school staff member before assaulting the teacher.
The incident escalated quickly, prompting intervention from school police. An Officer was able to restrain the student outside the building without further incident.
🄳🄾🄾🄼🄿🤖🅂🅃🄸🄽🄶
⚡4