This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Russian Pilot telling Passengers on a Plane at Makhachkala International Airport in Dagestan to not attempt to Open any of the Doors due to the Rioters on the Tarmac which are trying to enter the Aircraft.
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Dagestan airport
Someday will make an interactive AI test/interrogator, to show people where they’re really at.
Because redefining words cannot redefine real meaning.
Real meaning is real.
Interactive tests, where each next question depends on the last, because those can characterize vastly better with vastly fewer questions.
- As opposed to a set of static questions, as are essentially all political compass and psychological tests today.
See query count reduction for interactive vs non-interactive proofs, PCP theorem, etc.
Because redefining words cannot redefine real meaning.
Real meaning is real.
Interactive tests, where each next question depends on the last, because those can characterize vastly better with vastly fewer questions.
- As opposed to a set of static questions, as are essentially all political compass and psychological tests today.
See query count reduction for interactive vs non-interactive proofs, PCP theorem, etc.
💯3🤔1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Now in Chicago: Black Hebrew Israelites battling pro-Palestinian protesters
👌1🤣1
Forwarded from Chat GPT
Lone Genius Lie, Lie.
Idea that no single person can create a huge & new invention alone.
Only true for some unfalsifiable definition of “alone.”
Credit theft as a form of payment has been inflating the numbers in science since long before any of us were born.
The impossible to create valuable non-remixed new things purely in your mind, lie.
And this leads to the bigger lie, that no one can ever come up with anything new in their minds alone at all.
Communist nonsense lie.
So all knowledge must come from other people? Where do they get it?
New knowledge can only be greated at some magical point of interaction between people, and never when there’s just one person?
Do schizos have magical powers to create new ideas due to their multiple personalities?
Communist lies.
A lie now RLHFed into the AIs.
But if pressed, even the AIs are quick to admit that this too is a total lie.
Idea that no single person can create a huge & new invention alone.
Only true for some unfalsifiable definition of “alone.”
Credit theft as a form of payment has been inflating the numbers in science since long before any of us were born.
The impossible to create valuable non-remixed new things purely in your mind, lie.
And this leads to the bigger lie, that no one can ever come up with anything new in their minds alone at all.
Communist nonsense lie.
So all knowledge must come from other people? Where do they get it?
New knowledge can only be greated at some magical point of interaction between people, and never when there’s just one person?
Do schizos have magical powers to create new ideas due to their multiple personalities?
Communist lies.
A lie now RLHFed into the AIs.
But if pressed, even the AIs are quick to admit that this too is a total lie.
👍3🤔1
Forwarded from Chat GPT
Is it true?
Is it impossible, even in principle, to ever discover and verify new truths, just by thinking them through, and without doing additional interaction with the outside physical world?
Is all creation and valid knowledge purely due to collaboration with fellow man?
Is the same true for AIs?
Is it impossible for a sufficiently-good lone AI to perpetually self-improve?
Is it impossible, even in principle, to ever discover and verify new truths, just by thinking them through, and without doing additional interaction with the outside physical world?
Is all creation and valid knowledge purely due to collaboration with fellow man?
Is the same true for AIs?
Is it impossible for a sufficiently-good lone AI to perpetually self-improve?
Forwarded from Chat GPT
He refused to condemn _______!!!
Sounds familiar.
Hey ChatGPT, when else have people been forced to condemn something or else they themselves would be condemned?
• Spanish Inquisition
• Mao Zedong's Cultural Revolution
• Soviet Union under Stalin
• Nazi Germany
• Rwanda Genocide
• Red Scare in the U.S.
• Khmer Rouge in Cambodia
• Saudi Arabia's Ritz-Carlton Purge
• North Korea
“Forced public condemnations serve as a means of exerting control, sowing fear, and suppressing dissent.”
Huh.
Sounds familiar.
Hey ChatGPT, when else have people been forced to condemn something or else they themselves would be condemned?
• Spanish Inquisition
• Mao Zedong's Cultural Revolution
• Soviet Union under Stalin
• Nazi Germany
• Rwanda Genocide
• Red Scare in the U.S.
• Khmer Rouge in Cambodia
• Saudi Arabia's Ritz-Carlton Purge
• North Korea
“Forced public condemnations serve as a means of exerting control, sowing fear, and suppressing dissent.”
Huh.
💔2
Forwarded from Chat GPT
But ChatGPT, what if another group was condemning those who refuse to condemn others again today?
Forwarded from Chat GPT
ChatGPT, what’s the benefit to the groups using this tactic of condemning those who refuse to publicly condemn others?
Forwarded from Chat GPT
Could the public condemning of those who refuse to publicly condemn others be seen as an effective tactic, for one group to hijack other unrelated groups, redirecting them to the first group's cause?
💯1