DoomPosting
Good. Ethereum security is horrible, the ecosystems' investment in more secure tech is horrible, reliance on legal systems to bandaid the problem is a horrible idea, About time law stops covering for many Ethereum's terrible problems, Time to do whatever…
*highly profitable trading strategooooooors
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Artificial intelligence can't generate hands!
Nature generating hands:
Nature generating hands:
🤔3
No, "decentralization" as a measure of goodness of crypto protocols is peak midwit.
Complete retards know it's BS.
Actual super-smart know it's BS.
Only those in the middle ever ate up this "decentralization" nonsense.
What's worse,
not only is it dead wrong,
"crypto = decentralization"
- is the doorway to digital communism.
No, more people voting for something to be good or true, does not make the thing good or true.
No, we cannot allow ourselves to fall for the lie that consensus makes truth.
No, it's not "the best system we have". It's not even the system that's doing all the good for us now, despite taking credit for doing so.
Sure, we can accept that crypto = decentralization as soon as we have 1 person = 1 vote elections voting on what everyone's bitcoin account balances are.
Try real "decentralization".
Try real democracy.
Try real consensus truth.
See how that works out.
Any system having those flawed elements while working - works in spite of them, not because of them.
🐻🐻🐻
Complete retards know it's BS.
Actual super-smart know it's BS.
Only those in the middle ever ate up this "decentralization" nonsense.
What's worse,
not only is it dead wrong,
"crypto = decentralization"
- is the doorway to digital communism.
No, more people voting for something to be good or true, does not make the thing good or true.
No, we cannot allow ourselves to fall for the lie that consensus makes truth.
No, it's not "the best system we have". It's not even the system that's doing all the good for us now, despite taking credit for doing so.
Sure, we can accept that crypto = decentralization as soon as we have 1 person = 1 vote elections voting on what everyone's bitcoin account balances are.
Try real "decentralization".
Try real democracy.
Try real consensus truth.
See how that works out.
Any system having those flawed elements while working - works in spite of them, not because of them.
🐻🐻🐻
👍1👌1
Forwarded from Chat GPT
@BasedBeffJezos, figurehead of the e/acc, i.e. "AI Acceleration" movement, doxxed by Forbes - Revealed to be founder of of an AI hardware startup.
Makes perfect sense.
AI hardware seller = zero care in the world care who's buying the chips.
Selling just to the people? Great.
Selling just to Communist China central powers? Great.
AI Acceleration doesn't really care either way
- Whoever pays the most.
(And really, solid case to be made that central powers would pay a far higher premium to monopolize that control. The monopolization premium.)
Which these 4 factions does the world need the most?
Here, illustrated it for you in the attached table.
Forbes Article
Makes perfect sense.
AI hardware seller = zero care in the world care who's buying the chips.
Selling just to the people? Great.
Selling just to Communist China central powers? Great.
AI Acceleration doesn't really care either way
- Whoever pays the most.
(And really, solid case to be made that central powers would pay a far higher premium to monopolize that control. The monopolization premium.)
Which these 4 factions does the world need the most?
Here, illustrated it for you in the attached table.
Forbes Article
Forwarded from Chat GPT
Who should get more AI power and control?
Anonymous Poll
16%
AI Pause (No One)
4%
AI Safety (The Authorities)
47%
AI Basedness (The Individual)
15%
AI Acceleration (Either / Don't Care)
17%
Show results
Forwarded from Chat GPT
Is AI nukes, or is AI guns?
Is AI like nukes:
• A weapon so powerful that there’s essentially NO DEFENSE against it, except to keep it out of people’s hands in the first place
• A weapon that the state CANNOT effectively use to inflict tyranny on its own citizens, as a country won’t nuke itself
Or, is AI like guns:
• A weapon where the weapon itself IS GOOD DEFENSE, good guys with the weapon can stop bad guys with the same kind of weapon
• A weapon the state CAN use to inflict tyranny on its own unarmed citizens, as countries will, and frequently do, shoot their own citizens
Is AI nukes or guns?
Is AI like nukes:
• A weapon so powerful that there’s essentially NO DEFENSE against it, except to keep it out of people’s hands in the first place
• A weapon that the state CANNOT effectively use to inflict tyranny on its own citizens, as a country won’t nuke itself
Or, is AI like guns:
• A weapon where the weapon itself IS GOOD DEFENSE, good guys with the weapon can stop bad guys with the same kind of weapon
• A weapon the state CAN use to inflict tyranny on its own unarmed citizens, as countries will, and frequently do, shoot their own citizens
Is AI nukes or guns?