Dying laughing here.
Watching all the fights this video is causing, as people slowly realize the ways of the world.
IT WAS ALL WOMEN.
Selling other women for money.
Women who, like the one in the video, refused to ever be trafficked themselves.
Just like the realities of Chinese foot binding, it’s virtually all women, every single time.
Why don’t they get prosecuted?
Age? Look at the map, no.
There are several reasons, but one that overpowers all others
— Society simply collectively decides that this particular group of criminals, simply can do no wrong.
Reality check time.
Almost 100% of you failed.
BTW, check out her hilarious comments at the end of that video.
Watching all the fights this video is causing, as people slowly realize the ways of the world.
IT WAS ALL WOMEN.
Selling other women for money.
Women who, like the one in the video, refused to ever be trafficked themselves.
Just like the realities of Chinese foot binding, it’s virtually all women, every single time.
Why don’t they get prosecuted?
Age? Look at the map, no.
There are several reasons, but one that overpowers all others
— Society simply collectively decides that this particular group of criminals, simply can do no wrong.
Reality check time.
Almost 100% of you failed.
BTW, check out her hilarious comments at the end of that video.
Forwarded from Chat GPT
Make race-based and sex-based hiring illegal again.
Overturn Griggs v. Duke Power Co.
Eliminate Disparate Impact.
Competence Over Quotas.
Their long march has only just begun.
Join the fight: @chadgptcoin
Tweet Link
Overturn Griggs v. Duke Power Co.
Eliminate Disparate Impact.
Competence Over Quotas.
Their long march has only just begun.
Join the fight: @chadgptcoin
Tweet Link
Forwarded from Chat GPT
The AI company’s social media manager endorsed this guy who says what they’re doing is wrong.
Why?
They agree that it’s wrong.
Why post job ads like this then?
It’s the law.
Boobs over brains, less white or goodnight.
The US law has what are referred to as legal “tensions”, or more appropriately, outright Maoist contradictions.
So then, how is a company to decide which out of two contradictory laws they must follow?
Zeitgeist of the time.
Back in 2009, the slide toward forced-discrimination by race and sex was already well underway, but not yet complete, with the anti-discrimination side still experiencing some wins.
Today?
The zeitgeist has shifted.
Today companies absolutely MUST discriminate by sex and race, or else.
The AI company here is legally right, and anyone with a genuine sense of right and wrong is upset about it.
Boobs over brains, less white or goodnight.
Disparate Impact Legal Tension
Why?
They agree that it’s wrong.
Why post job ads like this then?
It’s the law.
Boobs over brains, less white or goodnight.
The US law has what are referred to as legal “tensions”, or more appropriately, outright Maoist contradictions.
So then, how is a company to decide which out of two contradictory laws they must follow?
Zeitgeist of the time.
Back in 2009, the slide toward forced-discrimination by race and sex was already well underway, but not yet complete, with the anti-discrimination side still experiencing some wins.
Today?
The zeitgeist has shifted.
Today companies absolutely MUST discriminate by sex and race, or else.
The AI company here is legally right, and anyone with a genuine sense of right and wrong is upset about it.
Boobs over brains, less white or goodnight.
Disparate Impact Legal Tension