Zuck thinks he's relevant and that we care what Facebook thinks.
https://en-volve.com/2021/04/09/zuckerberg-announces-plan-for-facebook-to-label-and-shame-users-who-dont-get-covid-vaccine/
https://en-volve.com/2021/04/09/zuckerberg-announces-plan-for-facebook-to-label-and-shame-users-who-dont-get-covid-vaccine/
En-Volve
Zuckerberg Announces Plan For Facebook To Label And Shame Users Who Don't Get COVID Vaccine
In a post on his platform, Facebook CEO, Mark Zuckerberg officially noted his company’s immediate plans to visually segregate the vaccinated from the non-vacc
Forwarded from COVID VACCINE VICTIMS
Midwin Charles
47 Years old, from NY, USA
May ahe Rest In Peace ❤️
Midwin Charles was a Legal Analysts for CNN and MSNBC. She was vocal about the vaccine and had taken it in March 1, 2021. It is said she wasn’t feeling well since taking it and died on April 6, 2021. A cause of death has not been mentioned, but she seemed active and working out prior.
#Death #USA #Pfizer #COVIDVACCINEVICTIMS
HTTPS://T.ME/COVIDVACCINEVICTIMS
47 Years old, from NY, USA
May ahe Rest In Peace ❤️
Midwin Charles was a Legal Analysts for CNN and MSNBC. She was vocal about the vaccine and had taken it in March 1, 2021. It is said she wasn’t feeling well since taking it and died on April 6, 2021. A cause of death has not been mentioned, but she seemed active and working out prior.
#Death #USA #Pfizer #COVIDVACCINEVICTIMS
HTTPS://T.ME/COVIDVACCINEVICTIMS
Forwarded from TheStormHasArrived17 (TheStormHasArrived17)
Did you know that Marjorie Taylor Greene has been forcing Roll Call Votes on the floor of the House?
This requires Congress to show up in person to vote on a bill. This is preventing [them] from shoving through legislation in the middle of night.
MTG is a legend 🇺🇸
This requires Congress to show up in person to vote on a bill. This is preventing [them] from shoving through legislation in the middle of night.
MTG is a legend 🇺🇸
11.3 END OF OCCUPATION AND DURATION OF GC OBLIGATIONS
The status of belligerent occupation ends when the conditions for its application are no
longer met. Certain GC obligations with respect to occupied territory continue for the duration
of the occupation after the general close of military operations.
End of Occupation. Belligerent occupation ceases when 11.3.1 the conditions for its
application are no longer met.81 In particular, as discussed below, the status of belligerent
occupation ceases when the invader no longer factually governs the occupied territory or when a
hostile relationship no longer exists between the State of the occupied territory and the
Occupying Power.82
Belligerent occupation ends when the Occupying Power no longer has effectively placed
the occupied territory under its control.83 For example, an uprising by the local population may
prevent the Occupying Power from actually enforcing its authority over occupied territory.
Similarly, the Occupying Power’s expulsion or complete withdrawal from the territory would
also suffice because the former Occupying Power generally would not be able to control
sufficiently the occupied territory.
Belligerent occupation also may end when a hostile relationship no longer exists between
the Occupying Power and the State of the occupied territory (although, as discussed in the
following subsection, certain GC obligations may continue to apply).84
The status of belligerent occupation ends when the conditions for its application are no
longer met. Certain GC obligations with respect to occupied territory continue for the duration
of the occupation after the general close of military operations.
End of Occupation. Belligerent occupation ceases when 11.3.1 the conditions for its
application are no longer met.81 In particular, as discussed below, the status of belligerent
occupation ceases when the invader no longer factually governs the occupied territory or when a
hostile relationship no longer exists between the State of the occupied territory and the
Occupying Power.82
Belligerent occupation ends when the Occupying Power no longer has effectively placed
the occupied territory under its control.83 For example, an uprising by the local population may
prevent the Occupying Power from actually enforcing its authority over occupied territory.
Similarly, the Occupying Power’s expulsion or complete withdrawal from the territory would
also suffice because the former Occupying Power generally would not be able to control
sufficiently the occupied territory.
Belligerent occupation also may end when a hostile relationship no longer exists between
the Occupying Power and the State of the occupied territory (although, as discussed in the
following subsection, certain GC obligations may continue to apply).84
For example, if a new, independent government of the previously occupied territory assumes control of the territory and
consents to the presence of the previously occupying forces, then such a situation would no
longer be considered a belligerent occupation. Similarly, if a peace treaty legitimately transfers
the territory to the sovereignty of the Occupying Power, then the Occupying Power would no
longer be characterized as such. However, an Occupying Power is not permitted, under the law
of belligerent occupation, to annex occupied territory.85
consents to the presence of the previously occupying forces, then such a situation would no
longer be considered a belligerent occupation. Similarly, if a peace treaty legitimately transfers
the territory to the sovereignty of the Occupying Power, then the Occupying Power would no
longer be characterized as such. However, an Occupying Power is not permitted, under the law
of belligerent occupation, to annex occupied territory.85