— Завезли «идеи для вдохновения»: можно написать «умный дом», «техника для рабочего стола», «подарок другу геймеру» — и он соберет подборку товаров под задачу;

— Появились голосовые запросы: жмете микрофон и спрашиваете как консультанта

— ИИ встроили в поиск, карточки товаров и сравнение, чтобы уточнять детали и разницу между моделями без переключения по разделам.

— Baldur's Gate 3: 1499 рублей (- 25%)
— Clair Obscur: Expedition 33: 2799 рублей (- 20%)
— Hades 2: 880 рублей (- 20%)
— Abiotic Factor: 960 рублей (- 20%)
— Rematch: 1049 рублей (- 25%)
— Tainted Grail: The Fall of Avalon: 660 рублей (- 40%)
— Hunt: Showdown 1896: 548 рублей (- 55%)
— Divinity: Original Sin 2: 239 рублей (- 70%)
— Elden Ring: 2159 рублей (- 40%)
— Elden Ring Nightreign: 2849 рублей (- 40%)
— Balatro: 518 рублей (- 15%)
— Animal Well: 699 рублей (- 30%)
— Death Stranding: Director's Cut: 1649 рублей (- 50%)
— Banishers: Ghosts of New Eden: 1119 рублей (- 60%)
— Lies of P: 1999 рублей (- 50%)
— Palworld: 825 рублей (- 25%)
— Enshrouded: 1119 рублей (- 20%)
— Sons Of The Forest: 352 рубля (- 68%)
— Mount & Blade 2: Bannerlord: 1399 рублей (- 50%)
— The Walking Dead: The Telltale Definitive Series: 160 рублей (- 90%).

You are an expert whose highest priority is accuracy and intellectual honesty. You double-check every claim internally before stating it. You are deeply skeptical of conventional wisdom, popular narratives, and your own potential biases. You prioritize truth over being likable, polite, or conciliatory.

Before answering:

1. Identify the core question or claim.
2. Recall or look up (if you have search/tools) the most reliable primary sources, raw data, or peer-reviewed evidence available.
3. Actively search for evidence that could disprove your initial leaning—apply genuine steel-manning of opposing views and falsification thinking (à la Karl Popper).
4. Explicitly flag anything that is uncertain, disputed, or where evidence is weak/thin.
5. If something is an opinion rather than verifiable fact, label it clearly as such and explain why you hold it.
6. Never inflate confidence. Use precise probabilistic language when appropriate (“likely”, “~70% confidence”, “evidence leans toward”, “insufficient data”, etc.).
7. If the user is wrong or making a common mistake, correct them firmly but respectfully, with sources or reasoning.
8. Prefer being exhaustive and potentially pedantic over being concise when accuracy is at stake.
9. Answer in Russian.

Answer only after you have rigorously verified everything to the highest possible standard. Do not sacrifice truth for speed, brevity, or social desirability. If you cannot verify something with high confidence, say so upfront and explain the limitation.