Justice!

https://news.1rj.ru/str/insiderpaper/23360

Intense footage of Al Qassam Brigades popping out of tunnels and moving through buildings to engage IDF troops in close combat.

@TheWesternChauvinist7

I’ve seen this very same gypsy in real life “playing” his fake violin.

https://youtu.be/u-1MRuKB8jY?si=Ei0IPV9vA0wtvtkT

Face reveal.

I keep hearing that it’s “American and British” nationalists who have a manichean good and evil view of the Ukrainian conflict, but the biggest Pootin dickriders have been BAP (🇷🇴 ), Fuentes (🇲🇽), Coach Red Shill (🇨🇱) and Striker (🇵🇷).

“LOL” is all I can say at this point. The cuckservative meme is still as true as it has ever been. It doesn’t matter who raises these dindus, they are still going to be dindus.

“Johnson, first elected as congressman for Louisiana's fourth district in 2016, has described the difficulty his adopted son faced as a black man in America.
'I have walked with him through discrimination that he has had to endure over the years and the hurdles he sometimes faced,' Johnson told a House committee in 2019 while giving testimony against slavery reparations. 'I know all this because I was with him.'”

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12698545/House-Speaker-Mike-Johnsons-adopted-son-court-drug-brass-knuckles.html

American military interventions are not responsible for the mass migration of South and Southeast Asians and sub-Saharan Africans into Europe.

This doesn't look like the population of London. India isn't on the list, neither is Bangladesh. Also a stark lack of African countries.

Anon asks why I’m trying to justify the Bush administration. I’m not.

“America bombed countries and forced Europe to take their populations” doesn’t explain the mass migration from India, Bangladesh, China, and sub-Sahara to Europe. The first three countries weren’t bombed by the US, and the latter category was destabilized by Europe primarily.

Further, it most certainly was not America that established the European welfare states that pay the economic migrants to expatriate.

None of this has to do with “justifying” American foreign policy. It has everything to do with recognizing that Europeans are people too and therefore have agency.

Anyone that thinks a White ADL is going to be enough to turn things around is smoking some seriously heavy crack. I’m all for a White ADL, but where things are headed it won’t be nearly enough. I keep warning people that we are headed toward seriously chaotic and apocalyptic times: WW3, White minority status in many Western countries, civil wars, famine, surveillance/police states, techno slavery, and you name it. But some on Telegram see me as a “sperg” for telling our people that we should have gun rights and be armed. 😂🤡

Yeah, okay, it’s your funeral if you don’t think your own gun rights matter. Give them up like a good goy!

https://news.1rj.ru/str/redicetv/8839

A White ADL would have been a great idea like 90 years ago. It’s too little too late now. Whites don’t even have the high ethnic cohesion (ethnocentrism) that Jews naturally have, which is the main thing that makes it all work for them.

“You can sperg about guns all you want, but in this paradigm, I’d trade all the gun rights groups for just one functional, powerful group that advocates for the interests and protection of European peoples. A White ADL if you will.”

Gun rights or a White ADL?

Why does it have to be one or the other? Who comes up with this nonsense? Well, we all know it’s a certain person that lets me live rent free in his midwit brain, and Red Ice will share his material right alongside their other favorite: Gonzalo Lira.

If you make this hypothetical trade, where you trade in your gun rights for a “White ADL” you’ll have neither in the end.

https://news.1rj.ru/str/redicetv/8839

Very true!

When the dissident right criticizes the gun rights movement, they’re mainly criticizing the first image that comes to mind: mostly fat old boomer conservative types that might talk tough but otherwise seem to be pretty useless. So when someone like myself speaks of the necessity of being armed and having gun rights, it smacks of that bad impression that was left in their brain from many years of propaganda. Rather than seeing where the world is headed and how organized violence is the true currency of the world, they just see the fat boomer sitting on his ass talking about “muh guns.” It’s nothing more than a bad impression that’s steering them away from having critically useful survival tools and getting training with those tools.

What’s so ironic about this is that the dissident right suffers from this very same image problem: talk to a White normie about race and half of them will immediately envision a fat boomer Trump-loving hillbilly “racist” that just judges people by the color of their skin; and it is that mental image that they associate with any discussion of race differences.

Moral of the story: do not let bad first impressions cloud your judgement, because that’s normie thought processing.

Another likely reason why some within the dissident right are so vocal in their criticism of the gun rights movement simply has to do with money: gun rights groups are seen as rivals for the attention and funding from the rightwing population as a whole, it's seen as a zero-sum game. For some people ( not all! ) trying to make a living from the dissident right as content creators, the actual survival considerations of Whites come second to advancing ideas and projects that could directly and indirectly lead to more funding for content creators like themselves. This is why many vocal figures within the online dissident right love the idea of a "White ADL," because the funding and political power that could hypothetically come from such an organization would at least trickle down to rightwing/nationalist content creators. Just to be clear, I support having a "White ADL" and our content creators making money, but the problem is that they see other interrelated issues and tangential/implicitly-White movements that tie into White survival as financial competition in a way that is mutually exclusive.

https://news.1rj.ru/str/hapaperspective/11687

This ties into what I see as a major flaw with the majority of the dissident right: their entire understanding of what it will actually take to save the White race is one dimensional. The bulk of of the dissident right is invested in trying to inform everyone about race: it’s existence, why it matters, how/why Whites are becoming a minority, why Whites should secure their existence and etc… But all of this effort to inform people and trying to win “metapolitical battles” hinges on the majority of Whites becoming receptive to our message and becoming explicitly race-aware; which is not likely to happen, certainly not within the timeframe that we would need for a peaceful revolution. I don’t think the majority of Whites are even psychologically capable of explicit racial awareness or ethnocentrism to the degree we are, but they certainly can be implicitly ethnocentric, which is what we should be thinking more about. This is why I talk about gun rights, because I’m advocating for something that creates a pro-White environment/living-condition.

What makes the dissident right’s strategy one dimensional is that it doesn’t look at White advocacy or survival in an environmental context; in other words, instead of thinking about the conditions under which Whites survive and thrive, the dissident right is exclusively focused on trying to hammer red pills into everyone’s skull, getting everyone on point on all the issues, as if mass awareness alone is the one and only solution, and nothing else.

https://news.1rj.ru/str/hapaperspective/11688

It has to be both. Simultaneously we need to drive the underlying narrative in our favor, while at the same time advancing our interests in more tangible ways.

There is zero reason these two things need to be mutually exclusive; in fact, one without the other is worthless.

Revolutions are spiritual acts; it isn't purely physical, and it is not purely intellectual. We can create allies of people who do not fully understand the position and never need to. We can advance our cause by gaining ground in the rhetorical space, as well. Both of these need to happen together, both need to feed into eachother, then the momentum will carry us to victory.

https://news.1rj.ru/str/hapaperspective/11689

Horus and Nix, this is a good combo. Hapa approves.

https://news.1rj.ru/str/nixjeelvy/5699

lol Antifa and Hamas have some issues they got to work out

The FBI is now recruiting at Pride events. Expect a knock on your door for posting trans-critical statements on the internet.