There’s something deeply ironic about Endeavour living in Russia, a country where genuine pro-White advocacy, criticism of the Kremlin, the “military operation,” Putin and Islam can send you straight to prison or the even the afterlife, yet Endeavour still believes that a population being armed is far less important than dependence on “counter-elites” that will supposedly put themselves at great risk to save us, without us having to actually lift a finger or face any violent threats.

What if the elites actually need us to save them?

Signers of the United States Declaration of Independence, by Ancestry and Religion.

#AA
@FaithAndFolk2

This is something that had bothered me even years before I was red pilled to the degree I am now. The practice of transracial adoption. There was always something a bit off about it and it’s not just Christians who’ve done it, but far too often they’re the main culprits based on a very distorted view of the Bible that only emerged post-WWII. This is an excerpt from the book “Cuckservative”, page 184.

This is one major reason why people like Endeavour are wrong to think that meta-politics will be enough to save us, as if we’re all good because “we’re winning on Twitter boys!”

In most places, you’re not even allowed to discuss the problem.

https://news.1rj.ru/str/DevonStack/2673

ICYMI

https://news.1rj.ru/str/hapaperspective/12146

Something I plan to write more about: What the boogaloo and lolbertarian groups are to the Second Amendment community, groups like Bloodtribe and Atomwaffen are to the White Nationalist movement.

Cringe sub factions exist within every movement, and you’ll always see critics of any movement pointing to one of its cringe sub faction to straw-man and discredit the entire movement and all of its core tenets. In other words, if you hate a village, find the village idiot and declare him its representative.

From within the Dissident Right, we often see our own people laughing at the cringe lolbert boogaloo types that claim to be “against all tyranny” standing with BLM or shouting ACAB alongside antifa, and the dissident right sees this and says “see, that’s what the secondment amendment is about, it’s just liberal boomerism.” But I’ve seen a similar behavior from within the 2A community: they show their community Bloodtribe and Atomwaffen, and they say to their community “see, all these ‘White Nationalists’ are boneheaded Nazis and FEDs!”

And I’m over here with one foot in Nationalism and the other foot in the Second Amendment community, watching both sides straw-man and mischaracterize the shit out of each other.

It’s a brother war.

Happy New Beer 🍺

Endeavour won’t even link to my Substack responding to his Substack, so I can only assume it’s because he doesn’t trust his own audience to read what I wrote and think for themselves.

https://news.1rj.ru/str/Royal_Endeavour/1796

Endeavour’s point about the “well regulated” part in the Second Amendment is easy to debunk: if the founders intended for only a government controlled militia to be armed, then the 2A would have been written this way “the right of the militia to keep and bear arms…” but it says the people in contrast to the militia. Remember, the colonists had just fought a war against their own government— Yes, it was 100% an insurrection. Also, governments don’t need to acknowledge their own right to keep and bear arms, so it would be nonsensical to claim the the 2A is protecting some government/state right to keep an armed militia.

The “well regulated” part of the 2A meant something different in the late 1700s. It referred to functionality, like a well regulated clock. So in context, it meant the militia/people need modern, functional weapons suitable for war to maintain a free state.

And again, it’s in the Bill of Rights, which if Endeavour actually read it, is all about protecting individual rights from the state — like freedom of speech and the right to remain silent. It’s unequivocally for the people.

https://news.1rj.ru/str/Royal_Endeavour/1796

If the Second Amendment did not acknowledge that The People have a right to keep and bear arms, the entire Bill of Rights would fall apart. I think that’s one major reason why the Supreme Court recently defended the true meaning and purpose of the Second Amendment as it was written in 1791 - the Bruen decision.

Finally, thanks for sharing!

https://news.1rj.ru/str/Royal_Endeavour/1798

"This is Michael Rapaport, coming to you live from the Gay Sex Store..."