The ruling class will say things like “you can’t defeat our F16s with your AR15s” but then spend billions and billions of dollars worth of political effort to try to ban your right to keep and bear arms. Actions speak louder than words — their actions show they absolutely fear an armed White population. If they truly believed they’re safe because they have F16s and nukes, they wouldn’t care about you having a rifle.

https://news.1rj.ru/str/hapaperspective/12233

It should be obvious by now: Do not judge the establishment ruling class by what they say, judge them by what they do.

Here’s a new response I keep hearing to my 2A evangelism within the dissident right.

“The establishment/regime/ruling-class are just attacking your rights as a distraction! They don’t actually care if the populace is armed!”

It’s funny seeing these same people going insane and complain endlessly about the government trying to ban raw milk, gas/wood fired stoves, “offensive speech” or anything else. What if that’s also just a distraction?

You can’t have your cake and eat it too: Either the establishment/regime/ruling-class bans things as a distraction or they don’t, and that applies to raw milk and gas/wood stoves as much as it applies to all firearms and “assault rifles.”

“Well you actually have way more freedom in North Korea because you can say k*ke and n*gger out loud and no one there will care.”

Dissident Right logic in a nutshell. They aren’t all literally saying this, but they might as well.

This is why a lot of smart people have abandoned the dissident right. It’s not that they stopped caring about the White race, it’s that they’re sick of dealing with retards.

https://news.1rj.ru/str/hapaperspective/12238

One thing that the Dissident Right has taught me is the freedom can be highly subjective. What most people in the DR believe freedom is: the ability to do the things one wants to do without any negative consequences. Most people within the DR don’t believe freedom is something you ever have to fight for or defend, because such a notion is seen by the DR as a “boomer cliche.” Within the DR, Freedom is just a nebulous vibe, a feeling, it’s something DR folks can’t define, they just feel something is wrong because in most western countries the police show up if they post “n*gger” or “k*ke” online — and of course they don’t have a girlfriend, so they must not have freedom.

Freedom from Government interference doesn’t factor anywhere into their understanding/definition of freedom, but they feel the boot of the state on their neck and they don’t like it.

When people tell me that having rights protected by law doesn’t matter because, as critics have typically said, “rights and laws are just writing on paper, so it doesn’t matter!” When I hear that, I think of places like Australia where people don’t have anything equivalent to our First Amendment. If Australians express themselves in any way that is deemed “extremist” or “anti-semitic” by the establishment, the government will immediately punish them and fund the Jewish side of any legal battles that target White Australians over “hate speech.”

This is all made possible by the fact that they don’t have a constitution that explicitly protects freedom of speech.

https://news.1rj.ru/str/realblaircottrell/4811

Another common criticism against the necessity of being armed questions its effectiveness in ensuring freedom. Critics often argue, “Just having a gun doesn’t mean you’re free. Despite the Second Amendment, Americans still face tyranny. So, what good does it do?”

Let’s apply this logic to other scenarios:

Consider gym memberships. Simply having access to a gym doesn’t guarantee fitness. Many gym members are not in shape, but does this mean gym memberships are useless? Similarly, owning tools doesn’t automatically make someone a skilled carpenter or mechanic, despite possessing hammers or screwdrivers. And having a kitchen doesn’t turn someone into a chef or ensure a hot dinner every night. Are kitchens, therefore, useless? Most people have them but can’t cook.

These examples may seem obvious, yet they illustrate the flawed reasoning often unnoticed in the debate about being armed to resist tyranny.

Before anyone starts wailing and rending their garments about poor Gonzalo, let’s remember that he’d kill us all if he had the chance.

https://odysee.com/@hapaperspective:f/an-equivocated-civnat-fantasy-if-coach:6

INTJ here

I’m an INTP.

Lol

Don’t expect any “counter elites” to save us. We must become our own “counter elites.” We are on our own.

https://news.1rj.ru/str/joeldavisx/3248

Nothing to see here, cattle. Move along…

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/only-dirt-and-tools-found-in-new-york-tunnel-not-mattresses-or-booster-seats-fact-check/ar-AA1mTrn0

Tonight on The Writer’s Block, we’ll be hosting returning friend of the show Andromeda to continue our discussion of the disintegration of the Russian Empire, this time with a focus on the national liberation movements in the captive nations.

Tune in to our Dlive, Odysee and Telegram channels at 22:00 CET, 4pm EST, 1pm PST. Send your questions, comments and donations through Entropy.

Thumbnail by Atlas AI Art.

Why would a US senator introduce a bill to congress which would effectively outlaw militia or tactical "paramilitary" training? Doesn't he know that militias are just LARPers and stand no chance against the US government's mighty, impressive, undefeated military power? Maybe he didn't read Endeavour's substack about how the government isn't afraid of militias? Surely the US political elite are just trying to distract us with these feel good bills banning harmless LARPing, just like how the bans on "hate speech" are also just a distraction, right?

Okay, that's enough sarcasm for today. It's insanely ironic that this senator is from Massachusetts, given that the war for America's independence (our first civil war) started in Massachusetts, by militias engaged in combat against the military forces of their government at the time. Is history repeating itself here? Here's what the bill is all about, from the senator's page:

"Washington (January 11, 2024) - Following the anniversary of the January 6th attack on the United States Capitol, Senator Edward J. Markey (D-Mass.) and Congressman Jamie Raskin (MD-08) introduced the Preventing Private Paramilitary Activity Act, legislation that would create a federal prohibition on paramilitary groups through civil and criminal enforcement. The prohibition would hold individuals liable who directly engage in certain types of conduct, including intimidating state and local officials, interfering with government proceedings, pretending to be law enforcement, and violating people’s constitutional rights, while armed and acting as part of a private paramilitary organization."

NYC Tunnels:
None of this is new. They have always build underground secret societies to undermine White nations.

Those out of the loop, a network of illegally dug tunnels were found yesterday underneath Chabad Lubavitch World Headquarters, in Crown Heights, Brooklyn.

Footage made it on Twitter of NYC police and Jews brawling in the synagogue when attempting to clear the area to fill parts of the tunnels with concrete. However in the footage you see children's mattresses soaked in dried blood pulled from the tunnels, as well as prams and highchairs.

This clip contains most footage:
https://x.com/CensoredMen/status/1744918081221128341